Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visual and Verbal Depressive Cognition: Implications for the Rumination–Depression Relationship

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present studies evaluated whether experiencing depressive cognition as visual (i.e., in the form of visual mental imagery) or verbal (i.e., in the form of verbal thought) was differentially associated with the strength of the rumination–depression relationship. Visual mental imagery is consistently found to be more emotionally arousing than verbal thought. This may especially be the case when individuals dwell on their visual or verbal depressive cognition in the form of depressive rumination. In Study 1, 41.2% of participants reported a visual depressive cognitive style and 57.1% reported a verbal depressive cognitive style. For both males and females, rumination was associated with similarly severe depressive symptoms when individuals reported experiencing visual depressive cognitions compared with verbal depressive cognitions. Study 2 replicated and extended Study 1, taking into account that some individuals may experience depressive cognition both visually and verbally. 23.8% of participants reported a visual depressive cognitive style, 38.9% a verbal depressive cognitive style, and 37.3% a both visual and verbal depressive cognitive style. Rumination was significantly associated with depressive symptom severity for all depressive cognitive styles (visual, verbal, both), though depressive cognitive style significantly moderated the relationship between rumination and depressive symptom severity such that there was a stronger relationship for individuals who had a visual depressive cognitive style than a verbal depressive cognitive style, especially for females. Findings suggest that dwelling on depressed affect (i.e., rumination) may be more strongly related to depressive symptom severity when individuals tend to experience depressive cognitions as visual. Examination of depressive cognition as both visual and verbal is necessary to fully understand how individuals think about their depressed affect and may eventually inform tailoring of interventions based on visual/verbal styles of depressive cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Given evidence that there may be brooding and reflection subtypes of rumination (e.g., Burwell and Shirk 2007), all analyses were re-run using only the brooding or reflection subscales of the RRS. As patterns of findings using the rumination total score, brooding subscale score, and/or reflection subscale score were identical, only the results for the rumination total score are presented.

  2. Given that Little’s test was marginally significant, follow-up analyses were conducted to compare participants who were missing at least one item with participants with complete data. On the RRS, participants who had missing data did not differ from participants who did not have missing data, t(124) = 0.46, p = 0.96; d = 0.26. On the CES-D, participants who had missing data also did not differ from participants who did not have missing data, t(125) = 0.33, p = 0.74; d = 0.13.

  3. As in Study 1, all analyses were repeated with the brooding and reflection subscales of the RRS. All patterns of findings were analogous using the rumination total score, brooding subscale score, and reflection subscale score; thus, results using the rumination total score are presented.

References

Download references

Funding

During the preparation of this manuscript, the first author was supported by the University of Maine Janet Waldron Doctoral Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah R. Lawrence.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Hannah R. Lawrence, Emily A. P. Haigh, Greg J. Siegle, and Rebecca A. Schwartz-Mette declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawrence, H.R., Haigh, E.A.P., Siegle, G.J. et al. Visual and Verbal Depressive Cognition: Implications for the Rumination–Depression Relationship. Cogn Ther Res 42, 421–435 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9890-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9890-0

Keywords

Navigation