Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personal Health Records and Patient-Oriented Infrastructures: Building Technology, Shaping (New) Patients, and Healthcare Practitioners

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. This phrase, as well as similar ones like `electronic medical record’, usually denote the patient-specific (electronic) record that represents and documents a single stay at a hospital of any patient. On the other hand, electronic health records and personal health record denote both lifelong collections of data and facts that pertain to the health of a single citizen. The difference between the latter two applications seems subtle, if not vague, to many commentators and it is often (NAHIT 2008) related to the degree of autonomy, access and ownership held by the patient (which is stronger in the PHR case)

References

  • Berg, Marc (1999). Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Patricia Flatley; Stephen Downs; and Gail Casper (2010). Project HealthDesign: rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. vol. 43, no. 5, pp. S3-S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabitza, Federico; Carla Simone; and Marcello Sarini (2009). Leveraging coordinative conventions to promote collaboration awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 301–330. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabitza, Federico; Carla Simone; and Giorgio De Michelis (2015). User-driven prioritization of features for a prospective InterPersonal Health Record: perceptions from the Italian context. Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, James J.; Vimla L. Patel; and Andre W. Kushniruk (2002). The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): Technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbrack, Lynne A. (2011). Vendor assessment: when will PHR platforms gain consumer acceptance. Tech Report HI227550. IDC Health Insights.

  • Emani, Srinivas; Cyrus K. Yamin; Ellen Peters; Andrew S. Karson; Stuart L. Lipsitz; Jonathan S. Wald; Deborah H. Williams; and David W. Bates (2012). Patient perceptions of a personal health record: a test of the diffusion of innovation model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 6, p. e150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, Gunther; John Powell; Marina Englesakis; Carlos Rizo; and Anita Stern (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ, vol. 328, no. 7449, p. 1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Geraldine (2004). Integrated care and the working record. Health Informatics Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Trisha; Susan Hinder; Katja Stramer; Tanja Bratan; and Tanja Russell (2010). Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ, vol. 341, no. 1, p. c5814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halamka, John D.; Kenneth D. Mandl; and Paul C. Tang (2008). Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Rachel; Gary S. Fischer; Sarah M. Sullivan; XinXin Dong; Melissa Weimer; Caroline Zeith; Sunday Clark; and Mark S. Roberts (2014). Patterns of Response to Patient-Centered Decision Support Through a Personal Health Record. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 984–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerbst, Alexander; Christian Dominik Kohl; Petra Knaup; and Elske Ammenwerth (2010). Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Househ, Mowafa, S.; Elizabeth M. Borycki; Wesley M. Rohrer; and Andre W. Kushniruk (2014). Developing a framework for meaningful use of personal health records (PHRs). Health Policy and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huba, Nicholas; and Yan Zhang (2012). Designing patient-centered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals’ perspective on patient-generated data. Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 3893–3905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, James S; Veenu Aulakh; and Adam Bosworth (2009). What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health affairs. vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 369-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krist, Alex H.; and Steven H. Woolf (2011). A vision for patient-centered health information systems. Journal of American Medical Association, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 300–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuziemsky, Craig E.; and Lara Varpio (2011). A model of awareness to enhance our understanding of interprofessional collaborative care delivery and health information system design to support it. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. e150–e160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, Kenneth D.; William W. Simons, William CR Crawford, and Jonathan M. Abbett (2007). Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. pp. 1–25.

  • Moen, Anne; and Patricia F. Brennan (2005). Health@Home: The work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. Journal of American Medical informatics Association, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 648–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAHIT (2008) Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on defining key health information technology terms. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. Chicago. Permanently archived at http://archive.is/SnDg0. Accessed 15 March 2019.

  • Piras, Enrico Maria; and Alberto Zanutto (2010). Prescriptions, x-rays and grocery lists. Designing a Personal Health Record to support (the invisible work of) health information management in the household. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 585–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piras, Enrico Maria; and Alberto Zanutto (2014). “One day it will be you who tells us doctors what to do!”. Exploring the “Personal” of PHR in paediatric diabetes management. Information Technology & People, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, James D.; Katie Coleman; Robert J. Reid; Matthew R. Handley; and Eric B. Larson (2010). Patient Experience Should Be Part Of Meaningful-Use Criteria. Health Affairs, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, Lygeia; Farzad Mostashari; Judy Murphy; Jodi G. Daniel; and Erin P. Siminerio (2013). A National Action Plan to Support Consumer Engagement Via E-Health. Health Affairs, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld; and Liam Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 1, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storni, Cristiano (2010). Multiple forms of appropriation in self-monitoring technology: Reflections on the role of evaluation in future self-care. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 537–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Melanie (2012). Crowdsourced Health Research Studies: An Important Emerging Complement to Clinical Trials in the Public Health Research Ecosystem. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 2, p. e46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Paul C.; Joan S. Ash; David W. Bates: J. Marc Overhage; and Daniel Z. Sands (2006). Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 13. no 2, pp. 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Elissa R.; Skyler Kelemen; Liljana Kaci; and Kenneth D. Mandl (2012). Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zieth, Caroline R.; Lichun Rebecca Chia; Mark S. Roberts; Gary S. Fischer; Sunday Clark; Melissa Weimer; and Rachel Hess (2014). The Evolution, Use, and Effects of Personal Health Records: A Narrative Review. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Maria Piras.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piras, E.M., Cabitza, F., Lewkowicz, M. et al. Personal Health Records and Patient-Oriented Infrastructures: Building Technology, Shaping (New) Patients, and Healthcare Practitioners. Comput Supported Coop Work 28, 1001–1009 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09364-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09364-x

Keywords

Navigation