Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Reliability of an Education-related Self-efficacy Scale for People with Psychiatric Disabilities

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the reliability of the Education-related Self Efficacy Scale (ESS-40), a measure of self-efficacy at a core task level designed for people with psychiatric disabilities. Sixty community residents with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated. The ESS-40 was administered twice via telephone interview. Short cycle test–retest reliability was very good for the total score and most items. The measure demonstrated signs of a coherent internal structure, adequate face validity, good client acceptability, and promising utility. The reliability evidence supports its use in community mental health services and in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. Sensitivity and predictive validity require further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Best, L. J., Still, M., & Cameron, G. (2008). Supported education; enabling course completion for people experiencing mental illness. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55, 65–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2008). An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 280–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Tucker, W. M. (2005). Overstating the case for recovery? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1022–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A. (2006). Oxford dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris M, Gladman B, Hennesey N, Lloyd C, Mowry B, and Waghorn G. (in press). Reliability of a scale of work-related self-efficacy for people with psychiatric disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.

  • Killackey, E., & Waghorn, G. (2008). The challenge of integrating employment services with public mental health services in Australia: Progress at the first demonstration site. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32(1), 63–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leckman, J. F., Sholomskas, D., Thompson, W. D., Belanger, A., & Weissman, M. M. (1982). Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: a methodological study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 879–883.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopresi, P., & Maag, E. (2007). The relationship between early disability onset and education and employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach-Kleinfeld, I., Sasson, R., Shvarts, S., & Grinshpoon, A. (2007). What education means to people with psychiatric disabilities: A content analysis. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megivern, D., Pellerito, S., & Mowbray, C. (2003). Barriers to higher education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(3), 217–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurnberger, J. I., Jr, Blehar, M. C., Kaufmann, C. A., York-Cooler, C., Simpson, S. G., Harkavy-Friedman, J., et al. (1994). Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training: NIMH genetics initiative. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 849–859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirkis, J., Burgess, P., Kirk, P., Dodson, S., & Coombs, T. (2005). Review of standardised measures used in the National Outcomes and Casemix Collection (NOCC), Version 1.2. Melbourne/Sydney/Brisbane: Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteous, N., & Waghorn, G. (2007). Implementing evidence-based employment services in New Zealand for young adults with psychosis: Progress during the first five years. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(12), 521–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics, 32, 153–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, J. M., Plapp, J. M., Stewart, G., Richards, I., & Bashir, M. (1987). Reliability of the psychosocial axes of DSM-III in an adolescent population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 228–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. R., Duan, J., Levinson, D. F., Shi, J., He, D., Hou, C., et al. (2008). No significant association of 14 candidate genes with schizophrenia in a large European ancestry sample: implications for psychiatric genetics. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 497–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. M. (2001). Reliability. In B. F. Bolton (Ed.), Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 29–48). USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & King, R. (2005). Work-related self-efficacy among community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 29, 105–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & King, R. (2007). Work-related subjective experiences, work-related self-efficacy, and career learning among people with psychiatric disabilities. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10(4), 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & Whiteford, H. (2003). The strength of self-reported course of illness in predicting vocational recovery for persons with schizophrenia. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 18, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghorn, G., Still, M., Chant, D., & Whiteford, H. (2004). Specialised supported education for Australians with psychotic disorders. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39, 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. We thank Joanne Sherring and Emma Robson of Hunter and New England Mental Health Service, New South Wales, Australia, for helping draft and revise items for the ESS-40. We also thank the participants and the Brisbane research team from the NIMH funded MGS2 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Waghorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, M., Gladman, B., Hennessy, N. et al. The Reliability of an Education-related Self-efficacy Scale for People with Psychiatric Disabilities. Community Ment Health J 47, 136–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9294-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9294-4

Keywords

Navigation