Abstract
We investigated the reliability of the Education-related Self Efficacy Scale (ESS-40), a measure of self-efficacy at a core task level designed for people with psychiatric disabilities. Sixty community residents with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated. The ESS-40 was administered twice via telephone interview. Short cycle test–retest reliability was very good for the total score and most items. The measure demonstrated signs of a coherent internal structure, adequate face validity, good client acceptability, and promising utility. The reliability evidence supports its use in community mental health services and in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. Sensitivity and predictive validity require further investigation.
References
Best, L. J., Still, M., & Cameron, G. (2008). Supported education; enabling course completion for people experiencing mental illness. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55, 65–68.
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2008). An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 280–290.
Brown, P., & Tucker, W. M. (2005). Overstating the case for recovery? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1022–1023.
Colman, A. (2006). Oxford dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Harris M, Gladman B, Hennesey N, Lloyd C, Mowry B, and Waghorn G. (in press). Reliability of a scale of work-related self-efficacy for people with psychiatric disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.
Killackey, E., & Waghorn, G. (2008). The challenge of integrating employment services with public mental health services in Australia: Progress at the first demonstration site. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32(1), 63–66.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Leckman, J. F., Sholomskas, D., Thompson, W. D., Belanger, A., & Weissman, M. M. (1982). Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: a methodological study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 879–883.
Lopresi, P., & Maag, E. (2007). The relationship between early disability onset and education and employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 49–62.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
Mansbach-Kleinfeld, I., Sasson, R., Shvarts, S., & Grinshpoon, A. (2007). What education means to people with psychiatric disabilities: A content analysis. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10, 301–316.
Megivern, D., Pellerito, S., & Mowbray, C. (2003). Barriers to higher education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(3), 217–231.
Nurnberger, J. I., Jr, Blehar, M. C., Kaufmann, C. A., York-Cooler, C., Simpson, S. G., Harkavy-Friedman, J., et al. (1994). Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training: NIMH genetics initiative. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 849–859.
Pirkis, J., Burgess, P., Kirk, P., Dodson, S., & Coombs, T. (2005). Review of standardised measures used in the National Outcomes and Casemix Collection (NOCC), Version 1.2. Melbourne/Sydney/Brisbane: Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network.
Porteous, N., & Waghorn, G. (2007). Implementing evidence-based employment services in New Zealand for young adults with psychosis: Progress during the first five years. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(12), 521–526.
Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics, 32, 153–161.
Rey, J. M., Plapp, J. M., Stewart, G., Richards, I., & Bashir, M. (1987). Reliability of the psychosocial axes of DSM-III in an adolescent population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 228–234.
Sanders, A. R., Duan, J., Levinson, D. F., Shi, J., He, D., Hou, C., et al. (2008). No significant association of 14 candidate genes with schizophrenia in a large European ancestry sample: implications for psychiatric genetics. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 497–506.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–427.
Thorndike, R. M. (2001). Reliability. In B. F. Bolton (Ed.), Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation (3rd ed., pp. 29–48). USA: Springer.
Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & King, R. (2005). Work-related self-efficacy among community residents with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 29, 105–113.
Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & King, R. (2007). Work-related subjective experiences, work-related self-efficacy, and career learning among people with psychiatric disabilities. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10(4), 275–301.
Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & Whiteford, H. (2003). The strength of self-reported course of illness in predicting vocational recovery for persons with schizophrenia. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 18, 33–41.
Waghorn, G., Still, M., Chant, D., & Whiteford, H. (2004). Specialised supported education for Australians with psychotic disorders. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39, 443–458.
Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. We thank Joanne Sherring and Emma Robson of Hunter and New England Mental Health Service, New South Wales, Australia, for helping draft and revise items for the ESS-40. We also thank the participants and the Brisbane research team from the NIMH funded MGS2 project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, M., Gladman, B., Hennessy, N. et al. The Reliability of an Education-related Self-efficacy Scale for People with Psychiatric Disabilities. Community Ment Health J 47, 136–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9294-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9294-4