Abstract
Grazing systems emit greenhouse gases, which can, under specific agro-ecological conditions, be partly or entirely offset by soil carbon sequestration. However, any sequestration is time-limited, reversible, and at a global level outweighed by emissions from grazing systems. Thus, grazing systems are globally a net contributor to climate change and the time scale of key processes needs to be factored into any mitigation efforts. Failing to do so leads to unrealistic expectations of soil carbon management in grazing systems as a mitigation strategy. Protecting the large carbon stocks in grazing lands is also essential in order to avoid further climate change from additional CO2 release. Despite the time-limited and reversible nature of soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands, sequestration should be promoted in cases where it delivers environmental and agronomic benefits as well as for its potential, particularly on degraded land, to increase the feasibility of limiting global warming to less than 2 or preferably 1.5 °C. Some peer-reviewed sequestration estimates are of a similar order of magnitude to other food systems mitigation options over a 10–20 years period, such as reducing food loss and waste by 15% or aligning diets with current health related dietary-recommendations. However, caution should be applied to such comparisons since mitigation estimates are associated with large uncertainties and will ultimately depend on the economic cost-benefit relation, feasibility of implementation and time frame considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batjes NH (2019) Technologically achievable soil organic carbon sequestration in world croplands and grasslands. Land Degrad Dev 30:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3209
Boone RB, Conant RT, Sircely J, Thornton PK, Herrero M (2018) Climate change impacts on selected global rangeland ecosystem services. Glob Chang Biol 24:1382–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13995
Carter S, Herold M, Rufino MC, Neumann K, Kooistra L, Verchot L (2015) Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level. Biogeosciences 12:4809–4825. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4809-2015
Conant RT, Cerri CEP, Osborne BB, Paustian K (2017) Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecol Appl 27:662–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1473
FAO 2017a Global livestock environmental assessment model. Model Description. Version 2.0. Rome, Italy
FAO (2017b) Soil organic carbon: the hidden potential. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
FAO 2018 Global livestock environmental assessment model (GLEAM) [WWW Document]. http://www.fao.org/gleam/results/en/. Accessed 4.24.18
FAO, ITPS 2015 Status of the World’s soil resources (SWSR) - main report. Rome, Italy
Fornara DA, Tilman D (2012) Soil carbon sequestration in prairie grasslands increased by chronic nitrogen addition. Ecology 93:2030–2036. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0292.1
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Godde C, Garnett T, Thornton P, Ash A, Herrero M (2018) Grazing systems expansion and intensification: drivers, dynamics, and trade-offs. Glob Food Sec 16:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.11.003
Havlík P, Valin H, Herrero M, Obersteiner M, Schmid E, Rufino MC, Mosnier A, Thornton PK, Böttcher H, Conant RT, Frank S, Fritz S, Fuss S, Kraxner F, Notenbaert A (2014) Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3709–3714. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308044111
Henderson B, Gerber PJ, Hilinski TE, Falcucci A, Ojima DS, Salvatore M, Conant RT (2015) Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ 207:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.029
Herrero, Conant R, Havlik P, Hristov AN, Smith P, Gerber P, Gill M, Butterbach-Bahl K, Henderson B, Valin H, Thornton PK (2016) Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat Clim Chang 6:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2925
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York
Itzkan S 2014 Upside (drawdown) the potential of restorative grazing to mitigate global warming by increasing carbon capture on grasslands. Somerville
Knapp AK, Fay PA, Blair JM, Collins SL, Smith MD, Carlisle JD, Harper CW, Danner BT, Lett MS, McCarron JK (2002) Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Prog Am Assoc Adv Sci 298:2202–2205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076347
Nordborg M (2016) Holistic management – a critical review of Allan Savory’ s grazing method. SLU/EPOK – Centre for Organic Food & Farming & Chalmers, Uppsala
Orr BJ, Cowie AL, Castillo Sanchez VM, Chasek P, Crossman ND, Erlewein A, Louwagie G, Maron M, Metternicht GI, Minelli S, Tengberg AE, Walter S, Welton S 2017 Scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface. Bonn, Germany
Pellegrini AFA, Ahlström A, Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Nieradzik LP, Staver AC, Scharenbroch BC, Jumpponen A, Anderegg WRL, Randerson JT, Jackson RB (2018) Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity. Nature 553:194–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24668
Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 992(80):987–992
Robinson TP, Thornton PK, Franceschini G, Kruska RL, Chiozza F, Notenbaert A, Cecchi G, Herrero M, Epprecht M, Fritz S, You L, Conchedda G, See L 2011 Global livestock production systems. Rome
Rogelj J, Shindell D, Jiang K, Fifita S, Forster P, Ginzburg V, Handa C, Kheshgi H, Kobayashi S, Kriegler E, Mundaca L, Seferian R, Vilarino MV 2018 Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°c in the context of sustainable development. Glob. Warm. 1.5°C. An IPCC Spec. Rep. [...] pp 82
Savory Institute 2013 Restoring the climate through capture and storage of soil carbon through holistic planned grazing
Seré C, Steinfeld H 1996 World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends (no. 127), Animal Production and Health. Rome
Smith P (2014) Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon? Glob Chang Biol 20:2708–2711. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12561
Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O, Howden M, McAllister T, Pan G, Romanenkov V, Schneider U, Towprayoon S, Wattenbach M, Smith J (2008) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363:789–813. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2184
Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Haberl H, Harper R, House J, Jafari M, Masera O, Mbow C, Ravindranath NH, Rice CW, Robledo Abad C, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, Tubiello F (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer OR, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 811–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2011.03.002
Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky BL, Lassaletta L, de Vries W, Vermeulen SJ, Herrero M, Carlson KM, Jonell M, Troell M, DeClerck F, Gordon LJ, Zurayk R, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Loken B, Fanzo J, Godfray HCJ, Tilman D, Rockström J, Willett W (2018) Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
Stanley PL, Rowntree JE, Beede DK, DeLonge MS, Hamm MW (2018) Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems. Agric Syst 162:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003
Stehfest E, van den Berg M, Woltjer G, Msangi S, Westhoek H (2013) Options to reduce the environmental effects of livestock production - comparison of two economic models. Agric Syst 114:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.002
van Groenigen JW, van Kessel C, Hungate BA, Oenema O, Powlson DS, van Groenigen KJ (2017) Sequestering soil organic carbon: a nitrogen dilemma. Environ Sci Technol 51:4738–4739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01427
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon L, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell S, Reddy S, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray C (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 6736:3–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
Wollenberg E, Richards M, Smith P, Havlík P, Obersteiner M, Tubiello FN, Herold M, Gerber P, Carter S, Reisinger A, van Vuuren DP, Dickie A, Neufeldt H, Sander BO, Wassmann R, Sommer R, Amonette JE, Falcucci A, Herrero M, Opio C, Roman-Cuesta RM, Stehfest E, Westhoek H, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Sapkota T, Rufino MC, Thornton PK, Verchot L, West PC, Soussana JF, Baedeker T, Sadler M, Vermeulen S, Campbell BM (2016) Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target. Glob Chang Biol 22:3859–3864. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13340
Funding
The inputs of C.M.G., M.H., and P.S. contribute to the project DEVIL [NE/M021327/1]. The input of P.S. also contributes to the following projects: U-GRASS [NE/M016900/1] and Soils-R-GRREAT [NE/P019455/1]. We thank the Centre of Organic Production and Consumption (EPOK) at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences for funding E.R.’s part of the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.G. and C.M.G. conceived and led the project, reviewed the literature, analyzed the data, wrote the paper. I.J.M.B., E.Z.E., M.H., C.E.M., A.M., E.R., C.S., P.S., and H.H.E.Z. conceived the project, reviewed the literature, analyzed the data, and edited the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 2541 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godde, C.M., de Boer, I.J.M., Ermgassen, E.z. et al. Soil carbon sequestration in grazing systems: managing expectations. Climatic Change 161, 385–391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02673-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02673-x