Abstract
Purpose
Although current guidelines recommend ticagrelor in addition to aspirin as the antiplatelet strategy for medically managed acute coronary syndrome (MMACS) patients, clinical evidence specific to this special population is lacking. Whether potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors should be used in MMACS patients is still under debate.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies exploring the efficacy or safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel versus clopidogrel or placebo in MMACS patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined by each study, and the safety endpoint was TIMI non-CABG major bleeding.
Results
A total of 6102 records were screened, and 4 studies including 46,346 patients were finally included. The use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly lowers the risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98; P = .018; I2 = 0%). A significant reduction in risks of all-cause death and myocardial infarction was also observed with the use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel. No significant difference in risks of stroke or TIMI non-CABG major bleeding (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.90–1.73; P = .191; I2 = 0%) was observed between potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors and clopidogrel.
Conclusion
Potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors, especially ticagrelor, decrease the risk of ischemic events in MMACS patients as compared with clopidogrel, without significantly increasing major bleeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213–60.
Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736–47.
Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57.
Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.
Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2016;134(10):e123–55.
De Luca L, Leonardi S, Cavallini C, Lucci D, Musumeci G, Caporale R, et al. Contemporary antithrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to cardiac care units in Italy: the EYESHOT Study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014;4(5):441–52.
Amsterdam EA, Peterson ED, Ou F-S, Newby LK, Pollack CV, Gibler WB, et al. Comparative trends in guidelines adherence among patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with invasive versus conservative management strategies: results from the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J. 2009;158(5):748–54.e1.
Chin CT, Ong TK, Krittayaphong R, Lee SWL, Sawhney JPS, Kim H-S, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of medically managed patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the multinational EPICOR Asia study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;243:15–20.
Chan MY, Mahaffey KW, Sun LJ, Pieper KS, White HD, Aylward PE, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and impact of conservative medical management for patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who have angiographically documented significant coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1(4):369–78.
Boden WE, Lansky A, Angiolillo DJ. Refining the role of antiplatelet therapy in medically managed patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(3):439–44.
Roe MT, Armstrong PW, Fox KAA, White HD, Prabhakaran D, Goodman SG, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1297–309.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.
Lindholm D, Varenhorst C, Cannon CP, Harrington RA, Himmelmann A, Maya J, et al. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with or without revascularization: results from the PLATO trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(31):2083–93.
Berwanger O, Lopes RD, Moia DDF, Fonseca FA, Jiang L, Goodman SG, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolysis: TREAT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(22):2819–28.
Sahlen A, Varenhorst C, Lagerqvist B, Renlund H, Omerovic E, Erlinge D, et al. Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(44):3335–42.
Lopes RD, Leonardi S, Neely B, Neely ML, Ohman EM, Ardissino D, et al. Spontaneous MI after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome managed without revascularization: the TRILOGY ACS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(11):1289–97.
Budaj A, Brieger D, Steg PG, Goodman SG, Dabbous OH, Fox KAA, et al. Global patterns of use of antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am Heart J. 2003;146(6):999–1006.
Cimminiello C, Dondi L, Pedrini A, Ronconi G, Calabria S, Piccinni C, et al. Patterns of treatment with antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: data from a large database in a community setting. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(8):836–46.
Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494–502.
Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1607–21.
James SK, Roe MT, Cannon CP, Cornel JH, Horrow J, Husted S, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive management: substudy from prospective randomised PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d3527.
Cerrato E, Bianco M, Bagai A, De Luca L, Biscaglia S, Luciano A, et al. Short term outcome following acute phase switch among P2Y12 inhibitors in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome treated with PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 22,500 patients from 14 studies. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019;22:39–45.
Liu Z, Xiang Q, Mu G, Xie Q, Zhou S, Wang Z, et al. Effectiveness and safety of platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors influenced by smoking status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(7):e010889.
Tarantini G, Ueshima D, D'Amico G, Masiero G, Musumeci G, Stone GW, et al. Efficacy and safety of potent platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in elderly versus nonelderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2018;195:78–85.
Bavishi C, Panwar S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S. Meta-analysis of comparison of the newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(5):809–17.
Lau ES, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Bonaca MP, Husted S, et al. Potent P2Y12 inhibitors in men versus women: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(12):1549–59.
Yun JE, Kim YJ, Park JJ, Kim S, Park K, Cho MS, et al. Safety and effectiveness of contemporary P2Y12 inhibitors in an East Asian population with acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(14):e012078.
Menozzi A, De Servi S, Rossini R, Ferlini M, Lina D, Abrignani MG, et al. Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed without coronary revascularization: a population needing treatment improvement. Int J Cardiol. 2017;245:35–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 3928 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, S., Li, Z., Yu, P. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Potent Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Medically Managed ACS Patients: a Meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 34, 199–208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-06940-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-06940-y