Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Aortic valve calcification scoring with computed tomography: impact of iterative reconstruction techniques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate whether image reconstruction with iterative reconstruction (IR) affects aortic valve calcification (AVC) scoring and likelihood categorization of severe aortic stenosis (AS). In this IRB-approved retrospective study, we included 100 consecutive patients with AS (40 females; mean age 77 ± 10 years; age range: 36–99 years) undergoing CT prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Non-enhanced, electrocardiography-gated CT of the heart was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and with advanced modeled IR at strength levels 1–5. AVC Agatston scores were calculated and gender-specific cut-off values for AS likelihood categorization were applied according to current European Society of Cardiology recommendations (from unlikely to very likely). Friedman test with post-hoc Bonferroni correction was applied to analyze interval- and ordinal-scaled data. Compared to FBP, each IR strength level produced significantly different AVC Agatston scores (p < 0.001–0.002). Median AVC Agatston score for image reconstruction with FBP was 2527 (IQR: 1711–3663) and decreased with increasing IR strength levels up to 2281 (IQR: 1471–3357) at strength level 5. Likelihood categorization of severe AS was significantly different among image reconstruction algorithms (p < 0.001). Image reconstruction with IR strength level 5 led to a downward shift of likelihood categorization in 28 patients (28%) compared to images reconstructed with FBP. IR significantly impacts AVC scoring with significantly decreasing AVC scores with increasing IR strength levels. This leads to relevant changes in likelihood categorization of patients with severe AS., leading to underestimation of severe AS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Munoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38(36):2739–2791. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kebed K, Sun D, Addetia K, Mor-Avi V, Markuzon N, Lang RM (2019) Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01745-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chew NWS, Ngiam JN, Tan BY, Sia CH, Sim HW, Kuntjoro I, Kong WKF, Tay ELW, Yeo TC, Poh KK (2020) Echocardiographic discrepancies in severity grading of aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cut-off values in an Asian population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01755-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu D, Hu K, Liebner E, Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Ertl G, Frantz S, Nordbeck P (2018) Value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography on defining true severe low gradient aortic stenosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34(12):1877–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1416-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Flachskampf FA (2018) Aortic stenosis in cancer survivors after chest radiation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(8):1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, Laissy JP, Himbert D, Tubach F, Duval X, Iung B, Enriquez-Sarano M, Vahanian A, Messika-Zeitoun D (2011) Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 97(9):721–726. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.198853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, Capoulade R, Malouf J, Aggarval S, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Cueff C, Larose E, Miller JD, Vahanian A, Enriquez-Sarano M (2014) Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(12):1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumgartner HC, Hung JC-C, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F Jr, Otto CM (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(3):254–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordic S, Desbiolles L, Sedlmair M, Manka R, Plass A, Schmidt B, Husarik DB, Maisano F, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H, Leschka S (2016) Optimizing radiation dose by using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction in high-pitch coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 26(2):459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3862-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McQuiston AD, Muscogiuri G, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Canstein C, Varga-Szemes A, Cannao PM, Wichmann JL, Allmendinger T, Vliegenthart RJE (2016) Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol 85(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Willemink MJ, den Harder AM, Foppen W, Schilham AM, Rienks R, Laufer EM, Nieman K, de Jong PA, Budde RP, Nathoe HM, Leiner T (2016) Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Messerli M, Rengier F, Desbiolles L, Ehl NF, Bauer RW, Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Nahle CP (2016) Impact of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification. Acad Radiol 23(12):1506–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Werf NR, Willemink MJ, Willems TP, Greuter MJW, Leiner T (2017) Influence of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on CT calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer dynamic phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(6):899–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1061-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Werf NR, Willemink MJ, Willems TP, Greuter MJW, Leiner T (2018) Influence of iterative reconstruction on coronary calcium scores at multiple heart rates: a multivendor phantom study on state-of-the-art CT systems. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34(6):947–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1292-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pawade T, Sheth T, Guzzetti E, Dweck MR, Clavel MA (2019) Why and how to measure aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(9):1835–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pawade T, Clavel MA, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L, Renard C, Gun M, Jenkins WSA, Macron L, Sechrist JW, Lacomis JM, Nguyen V, Galian Gay L, Cuellar Calabria H, Ntalas I, Cartlidge TRG, Prendergast B, Rajani R, Evangelista A, Cavalcante JL, Newby DE, Pibarot P, Messika Zeitoun D, Dweck MR (2018) Computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11(3):e007146. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, Aggarwal SR, Malouf J, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Cueff C, Larose E, Capoulade R, Vahanian A, Enriquez-Sarano M (2013) The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(24):2329–2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eberhard M, Mastalerz M, Frauenfelder T, Tanner FC, Maisano F, Nietlispach F, Seifert B, Alkadhi H, Nguyen-Kim TDL (2017) Quantification of aortic valve calcification on contrast-enhanced CT of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 13(8):921–927. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vonder M, van der Werf NR, Leiner T, Greuter MJW, Fleischmann D, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Willemink MJ (2018) The impact of dose reduction on the quantification of coronary artery calcifications and risk categorization: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(5):352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eberhard M, Hinzpeter R, Polacin M, Morsbach F, Maisano F, Nietlispach F, Nguyen-Kim TDL, Tanner FC, Alkadhi H (2019) Reproducibility of aortic valve calcification scoring with computed tomography—an interplatform analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 13(2):92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.01.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Willemink MJ, Noel PB (2019) The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol 29(5):2185–2195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistr. 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Ricarda Hinzpeter, Lucas Weber, Andre Euler, Hatem Alkadhi & Matthias Eberhard

  2. Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Albert M. Kasel & Felix C. Tanner

Authors
  1. Ricarda Hinzpeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andre Euler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert M. Kasel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Felix C. Tanner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hatem Alkadhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthias Eberhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Eberhard.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors of the manuscript has declared any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinzpeter, R., Weber, L., Euler, A. et al. Aortic valve calcification scoring with computed tomography: impact of iterative reconstruction techniques. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 1575–1581 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01862-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01862-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation