Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcome and functional characteristics of patients with asymptomatic low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction are closer to high-gradient severe than to moderate aortic stenosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asymptomatic “paradoxic” severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction (PAS) constitutes a challenging condition where the optimal management and follow-up remain elusive. We evaluated the clinical outcome in patients with PAS as compared to asymptomatic patients with moderate (MAS) or classical severe aortic stenosis (CAS). Consecutive asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis patients without concomitant other heart or lung disease (n = 121) were invited. Participants (n = 74) were assigned to three subgroups with regard to degree of aortic stenosis: MAS (n = 25), CAS (n = 22) and PAS (n = 27). Echocardiographic parameters at baseline and clinical outcome data after > 3 years of follow-up time were obtained. Patients with PAS had the smallest stroke volumes and the highest relative wall thickness (p < 0.05). Left ventricular mass index was highest in subjects with CAS, followed closely by PAS and eventually MAS subjects. Whereas ejection fraction was similar amongst the subgroups, a stepwise decrease in global longitudinal left ventricular strain with increasing degree of aortic stenosis was observed, with CAS patients displaying the lowest mean global longitudinal strain, followed by PAS and MAS. A trend towards increasing mortality rate by increasing degree of stenosis was observed. Patients with CAS underwent aortic valve replacement surgery more frequently than both PAS and MAS (p < 0.001). These data suggest that echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcome in patients with PAS bear closer resemblance to CAS than to MAS, but management of PAS is more conservative than in CAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BSA:

Body surface area

LV:

Left ventricle

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

PAS:

Asymptomatic “paradoxic” severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction

MAS:

Moderate aortic stenosis

CAS:

Classical (high-gradient, normal-flow) severe aortic stenosis

References

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368(9540):1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iung B, Vahanian A (2006)Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol 8(3):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross J Jr, Braunwald E (1968) Aortic stenosis. Circulation 38(1 Suppl):61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115(22):2856–2864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jander N, Minners J, Holme I, Gerdts E, Boman K, Brudi P et al (2011) Outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 123(8):887–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jander N, Hochholzer W, Kaufmann BA, Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Boman K et al (2014) Velocity ratio predicts outcomes in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF. Heart 100(24):1946–1953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, Davin L, O’Connor K, Rosca M et al (2012) Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(3):235–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Marechaux S, Castel AL, Debry N, Maizel J et al (2015) Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(1):55–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adda J, Mielot C, Giorgi R, Cransac F, Zirphile X, Donal E et al (2012) Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(1):27–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrmann S, Stork S, Niemann M, Lange V, Strotmann JM, Frantz S et al (2011) Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(4):402–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, Tan TC, Elmariah S, Picard MH et al (2013) Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 34(25):1906–1914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N (2008) Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 29(8):1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA (2013) Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation 15(16):1781–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JGBogaty P, Pibarot P (2007) Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115:2856–2864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1845–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ et al. (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Kavianipour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kavianipour, M., Farkhooy, A. & Flachskampf, F.A. Clinical outcome and functional characteristics of patients with asymptomatic low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction are closer to high-gradient severe than to moderate aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34, 545–552 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1264-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1264-2

Keywords

Navigation