Skip to main content
Log in

MNEs’ Ambidexterity Strategies and Moral Conflicts: The Case of Google in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) must often address moral conflicts given their responsibilities to meet conflicting demands from diverse stakeholders in transnational operations. Thus, this study constructs a comprehensive theoretical framework to understand the co-evolution between MNEs’ ambidexterity strategies and moral conflicts by incorporating studies on institutional theory and strategic management. Through a longitudinal case study, we find that the balance of three dimensions of ambidexterity strategies influences the content and intensity of MNEs’ moral conflicts by shaping the dual structure of stakeholders from home and host countries. Further, moral conflicts reshape the balance of ambidexterity strategies by the pressure of legitimacy and performance. Hence, to achieve better performance in transnational operations, MNEs must not only pay attention to the contingent ambidexterity strategies in dynamic environments, but also leverage the fitness among different dimensions of ambidexterity strategies. The findings provide implications for MNEs’ transnational operations in the increasingly complex global business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No additional relevant data or code was collected or developed for this study.

References

  • Alphabet. (2015). Code of conduct. Retrieved July 18, 2017 From https://abc.xyz/investor/other/code-of-conduct.html

  • Alphabet. (2018). Google code of conduct. Retrieved Oct 22, 2018 From https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct.html

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly, D., Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2016). Managing institutional complexity: A longitudinal study of legitimacy strategies at a sportswear brand company. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berleant, A. (1982). Multinationals, local practice, and the problem of ethical consistency. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(3), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D. O. (1994). Moral conflict and its structure. The Philosophical Review, 103(2), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, J., & Ims, K. J. (2004). A conflict case approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, P. F., Kohls, J. J., & Anderson, K. S. (1997). A model for addressing cross-cultural ethical conflicts. Business & Society, 36(2), 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgers, J. H., & Covin, J. G. (2015). The contingent effects of differentiation and integration on corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2014). Organizational susceptibility to institutional complexity: Critical events driving the adoption and implementation of the ethics and compliance officer position. Organization Science, 25(6), 1722–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabuschi, F., Holm, U., & Martín, O. M. (2014). Dual embeddedness, influence and performance of innovating subsidiaries in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 23(5), 897–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciasullo, M. V., Montera, R., Cucari, N., & Polese, F. (2020). How an international ambidexterity strategy can address the paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese emerging market multinationals. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 2110–2129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 636–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, G. E., & Haddow, N. (2008). Just doing business or doing just business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the business of censoring China’s Internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, & Thomas. (1989). The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, J. L. (2014). State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 1044–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L., & Molot, M. A. (2002). Insiders, outsiders and host country bargains. Journal of International Management, 8(4), 359–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organization learning. Organization Science, 2(3), 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulconbridge, J., & Muzio, D. (2016). Global professional service firms and the challenge of institutional complexity: ‘Field relocation’ as a response strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 89–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (Ed.). (1999). Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W., & Allbright, D. (1998). Resolving a moral conflict through discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Pont, C., Canales, J. I., & Noboa, F. (2009). Subsidiary strategy: The embeddedness component. Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 182–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genin, A. L., Tan, J., & Song, J. (2020). State governance and technological innovation in emerging economies: State-owned enterprise restructuration and institutional logic dissonance in China’s high-speed train sector. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00342-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google. (2012). Google code of conduct. Retrieved July 18, 2017 From https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct.html

  • Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, R. (2005). The bargaining view of business-government relations. In R. Grosse (Ed.), International Business-Government Relations in the 21st Century (pp. 273–290). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. B., & Knouse, S. B. (2001). Multinational enterprise decision principles for dealing with cross cultural ethical conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. B., Knouse, S. B., & Hill, V. (2009). Google in China: A manager-friendly heuristic model for resolving cross-cultural ethical conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G. R. (2001). International exchanges as the basis for conceptualizing ethics in international business. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2010). Business-conflict linkages: Revisiting MNCs, CSR, and conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Balogun, J. (2019). The social practice of co-evolving strategy and structure to realize mandated radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 850–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Tan, J., & Thursby, M. (2011). Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2006). Bring history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozhikode, R. K. (2015). Dormancy as a strategic response to detrimental public policy. Organization Science, 27(1), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M.S., & Block, E.S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R.

  • Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. F. (2019). AI· Future. Zhejiang People's Publishing House.

  • MacLean, T. L., & Behnam, M. (2010). The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1499–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1987). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, R. (2015). Institutionally driven moral conflicts and managerial action: Dirty hands or permissible complicity? Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (2004). Defining a moral problem in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(4), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R. G., & Gwozdz, W. (2014). From resistance to opportunity-seeking: Strategic responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility in the Nordic fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prange, C., & Verdier, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 1–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2001). The obsolescing “bargaining model”? MNC-host developing country relations revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, P., & Edman, J. (2014). MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3), 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A. (2015). Inverting Donaldson’s framework: A managerial approach to international conflicts of cultural and economic norms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4), 535–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. E., Xie, E., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Toward a legitimacy-based view of political risk: The case of Google and Yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 945–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (2013). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D. (2015). Making the news: Heterogeneous media coverage and corporate litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1341–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D., & Tan, J. (2017). Far from the tree? Do private entrepreneurs agglomerate around public sector incumbents during economic transition? Organization Science, 28(1), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2009a). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in china. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2009b). Multinational corporations and social responsibility in emerging markets: Opportunities and challenges for research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(S2), 151–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Chow, I. H. (2009). Isolating cultural and national influence on value and ethics: A test of competing hypotheses. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Tan, A. E. (2012). Business under threat, technology under attack, ethics under fire: The experience of Google in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S., David, R. J., & Sine, W. D. (2011). Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22(5), 1332–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(36), 686–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waeger, D., & Weber, K. (2019). Institutional complexity and organizational change: An open polity perspective. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 336–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2016). Fit by adaptation or fit by founding? A comparative study of existing and new entrepreneurial cohorts in China. StrategIc Management Journal, 37(5), 911–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was in part supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China research grants (71732005, 72072124, and 71472131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, S., Zhao, X. & Song, J. MNEs’ Ambidexterity Strategies and Moral Conflicts: The Case of Google in China. J Bus Ethics 186, 781–796 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05437-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05437-6

Keywords

Navigation