Abstract
This research examines the effect of an individual difference variable that reflects the extent to which one desires positive evaluations from others—that is, face consciousness on consumer energy-saving behavior—as well as the mechanism through which the effect occurs and conditions under which it varies. Drawing upon the means-end theory of lifestyles, we propose that face consciousness increases a status-seeking lifestyle and thus decreases energy-saving behavior. Moreover, the negative relationship between status-seeking lifestyle and energy-saving behavior is contingent upon a perceived seriousness of environmental problems and perceived environmental responsibility, such that the indirect and negative effect of such face consciousness is stronger for consumers who perceive less serious environmental problems and less environmental responsibility. Results from an experimental study and a field study using samples of Chinese consumers provide consistent evidence for the hypothesized model. Theoretical and practical implications for energy-saving behavior are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.
Adler, A. (1929). Problems of neurosis: A book of case histories. New York: Harper and Row.
Banerjee, R., & Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children’s materialism: The role of peer relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 17–31.
Bao, Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Su, C. (2003). Face consciousness and risk aversion: Do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychology & Marketing, 20(8), 733–755.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brunsø, K., Scholderer, J., & Grunert, K. G. (2004). Closing the gap between values and behavior—A means–End theory of lifestyle. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 665–670.
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767.
China Comprehensive Social Survey. (2010). Chinese National Survey Data Archive. Retrieved from http://cnsda.ruc.edu.cn/index.php?r=projects/view&id=15553986.
Choo, S., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2004). What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(3), 201–222.
Coreil, J., Levin, J. S., & Jaco, E. G. (1985). Life style-an emergent concept in the sociomedical sciences. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 9(4), 423–437.
Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2018). Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland. Journal of Business Research, 86(5), 333–343.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.
Endler, N. S. (1983). Interactionism: A personality model, but not yet a theory. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.
Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.
Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354.
He, A. Z., Cai, T., Deng, T. X., & Li, X. (2016). Factors affecting non-green consumer behaviour: An exploratory study among Chinese consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(3), 345–356.
Hirsh, J. B., & Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1583–1593.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hori, S., Kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52(1), 354–362.
Howard, J. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393.
Hwang, A., Francesco, A. M., & Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism-collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(1), 72–91.
Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358–370.
Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation: Exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 423–452.
Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407.
Kikuchi-Uehara, E., Nakatani, J., & Hirao, M. (2016). Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part I: Effect of environmental awareness and trust in environmental information on product choice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 10–18.
Kindra, G., Laroche, M., & Muller, T. (1994). The Canadian perspective consumer behaviour. Ontario: International Thomson Publishing.
Kulviwat, S., Bruner, I. I., G. C., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2009). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 706–712.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.
Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 87–96.
Lee, K., & Mano, H. (2014). Beyond simple innovativeness: A hierarchical continuum and thinking and feeling processing modes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(4), 597–613.
Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 237–256.
Li, J., Zhang, X. A., & Sun, G. (2015). Effects of “face” consciousness on status consumption among Chinese consumers: Perceived social value as a mediator. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 280–291.
Liao, J., & Wang, L. (2009). Face as a mediator of the relationship between material value and brand consciousness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(11), 987–1001.
Liu, L., Chen, R., & He, F. (2015). How to promote purchase of carbon offset products: Labeling vs. calculation? Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 942–948.
Marcoux, J. S., Filiatrault, P., & Cheron, E. (1997). The attitudes underlying preferences of young urban educated Polish consumers towards products made in western countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 5–29.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
Moschis, G. P., & Churchill, G. A. (1978). Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(4), 599–609.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
O’cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39.
Oyserman, D. (2001). Self-concept and identity. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 499–517) Malden: Blackwell Press.
Poortinga, W., LSteg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.
Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. ACR North American Advances.
Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Samuelson, C. D. (1990). Energy conservation: A social dilemma approach. Social Behaviour, 5(4), 207–230.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Schwepker, C. H. Jr., & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 77–101.
Sheldon, K. M., & McGregor, H. A. (2000). Extrinsic value orientation and “the tragedy of the commons”. Journal of Personality, 68(2), 383–411.
Shi, Z., Wen, L., & Zheng, W. (2014). Can ecological product win consumers in China? A study on the effect of product attributes and consumers’ face consciousness on ecological product preference. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 8(2), 182–205.
Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.
Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist, 36(4), 329–342.
Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137–8152.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. T. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–238). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tsai, S. P. (2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: An international investigation. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 429–454.
Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R., & Van Lange, P. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 258–278.
Veblen, T. (1988). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Mentor Books.
Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 44–50.
Wan, W. W. N., Luk, C.-L., Yau, O. H. M., Tse, A. C. B., Sin, L. Y. M., Kwong, K. K., et al. (2009). Do traditional Chinese cultural values nourish a market for pirated CDs? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(S1), 185–196.
Weiss, Y., & Fershtman, C. (1998). Social status and economic performance: A survey. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 801–820.
Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 323–331.
Wong, N. Y., & Ahuvia, A. C. (1998). Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 423–451.
Yin, J., Qian, L., & Singhapakdi, A. (2018). Sharing sustainability: How values and ethics matter in consumers’ adoption of public bicycle-sharing scheme. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 313–322.
Yue, T., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2013). Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 62, 665–675.
Zhang, X. A., Cao, Q., & Grigoriou, N. (2011). Consciousness of social face: The development and validation of a scale measuring desire to gain face versus fear of losing face. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 129–149.
Funding
This study was supported by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71572130), and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 15PJC094).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Wei, F. & Zhang, Xa. Why Does Energy-Saving Behavior Rise and Fall? A Study on Consumer Face Consciousness in the Chinese Context. J Bus Ethics 160, 499–513 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9