Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Power and Diffusion of Sustainability in Supply Networks: Findings from Four In-Depth Case Studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates how coercive and non-coercive power impacts on the successful diffusion of sustainability within supply networks. The paper reports on four in-depth case studies of the development of sustainability initiatives, each case based on data collection from focal companies and suppliers. The four case studies are based on 38 semi-structured interviews in total and supported by secondary data. The case studies indicate that both coercive and non-coercive power impact suppliers’ engagement in sustainability initiatives and its wider diffusion in supply networks. However, where the use of coercive power facilitates diffusion to immediate suppliers, the use of non-coercive (reward and expert) power leads to sustainability diffusion beyond the dyadic level into wider supply networks. The study provides rich insights into understanding sustainability diffusion in supply networks and the perceptions of multiple supply network actors on the role of different types of power on the diffusion process. We elaborate existing theory and formulate propositions to guide future research into the role and coexistence of different types of power in diffusing sustainability in supply networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, W. C., & Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., Baumann, H., & Hall, J. (2012). Conceptualizing sustainable development and global chains. Ecological Economics, 83, 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., Rogers, D. S., & Choi, T. Y. (2015). Toward the theory of the supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(2), 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2001). Understanding buyer and supplier power: A framework for procurement and supply competence. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2004). The art of the possible: Relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R. (1980). Channel-member satisfaction: Laboratory insights. Journal of Retailing, 56, 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etgar, M. (1978). Selection of an effective channel control mix. Journal of Marketing, 42, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadeeva, Z. (2004). Promise of sustainability collaboration—Potential fulfilled? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, G. L., & Rody, R. C. (1991). The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing, 55, 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, G. L., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Perceptions of interfirm power and its use within a franchise channel of distribution. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management—A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (2001). Supply network strategies. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (1998). Green purchasing and supply policies: Do they improve companies’ Environmental performance? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, J. H., Hofstetter, J. S., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55, 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: International Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, A., Salmi, A., & Havila, V. (1999). From dyadic change to changing business networks: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 779–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2000). Environmental supply chain dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M. (1996). Supply chain management: Relationships, chains and networks. British Journal of Management, 7, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Easton, G. (2002). Patterns of actor response to environmental change. Journal of Business Research, 55, 545–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, A., & Johnston, W. J. (2010). The impact of coercive and non-coercive forms of influence on trust, commitment and compliance in supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havila, V., & Salmi, A. (2000). Diffusion of change in business networks: An empirical study of mergers and acquisitions in the graphic industry. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, S. (1998). Domino effects in international networks. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 5(3), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose, S. U., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2014). The effect of institutional pressure on cooperative and coercive ‘green’ supply chain practices. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 20, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, G. C., & Blois, K. (2014). Power-base research in marketing channels: A narrative review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Nevin, J. R. (1974). Power in a channel of distribution: Sources and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, XI, 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 482–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, M., Khalil, S., Johnston, W. J., & Cheng, J. M.-S. (2014). The performance implications of power–trust relationship: The moderating role of commitment in the supplier–retailer relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvensivu, T., & Törnroos, J.-A. (2010). Case study research with moderate constructionism: Conceptualization and practical illustration. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, T. E., Miemczyk, J., & Howard, M. (2016). A systematic literature review of sustainable purchasing and supply research: Theoretical perspectives and opportunities for IMP-based research. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain Management: Introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, S., & Blois, K. (2015). Suppliers’ power relationships with industrial key customers. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(5), 562–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leek, S. (2012). Comments on applying a network level in environmental impact assessments. Journal of Business Research, 65, 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, J., & Wright, G. H. (2012). The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meqdadi, O., Johnsen, T. E., & Johnsen, R. E. (2017). The role of power and trust in spreading sustainability initiatives across supply networks: A case study in the bio-chemical industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 62, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels of analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 478–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D. (1997). Risk and power use: Constraints on the use of coercion in exchange. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013). Power asymmetry, adaptation and collaboration in dyadic relationships involving a powerful partner. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(3), 42–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28, 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öberg, C., Huge-Brodin, M., & Björklund, M. (2012). Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. E. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payan, J. M., & Nevin, J. R. (2006). Influence strategy efficacy in supplier–distributor relationships. Journal of Business Research, 59, 457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: The Role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L., & Bourlakis, M. (2009). The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: The case of Waitrose. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Gölgeci, I. (2013). Diffusion of environmental business practices: A network approach. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. L. (2014). Managing imbalanced triadic buyer–supplier–supplier relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. L. (2015). Love me, love me not: A nuanced view on collaboration in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 21, 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaaland, T. I., & Håkansson, H. (2003). Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain—The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. L., & Preuss, L. (2008). Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: Public sector perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1600–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, I. F. (1979). Power and satisfaction in channels of distribution. Journal of Retailing, 55, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wycherley, I. (1999). Greening supply chains: The case of the body shop international. Business Strategy and the Ethics, 8, 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B., & Yeung, J. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESC-Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France

    Osama A. Meqdadi

  2. Gianluca Spina Chair of Supply Chain Management, School of Management, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4/b, Building 26/B, Office 1.52, 20156, Milan, Italy

    Thomas E. Johnsen

  3. Business and Society, Audencia Nantes School of Management, Nantes, France

    Rhona E. Johnsen

Authors
  1. Osama A. Meqdadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas E. Johnsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rhona E. Johnsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osama A. Meqdadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meqdadi, O.A., Johnsen, T.E. & Johnsen, R.E. Power and Diffusion of Sustainability in Supply Networks: Findings from Four In-Depth Case Studies. J Bus Ethics 159, 1089–1110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3835-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3835-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation