Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cumulative evidence points to the effectiveness of moral dilemma discussion as a pedagogical strategy. However, much of the extant empirical research has been limited to investigating its effect on moral judgment. In addition, the potentially distinct effects of the two major components of the intervention, the intrapersonal contemplation and the interpersonal discussion that follows, have been barely examined. Using the Trolley Problem, this quasi-experimental study (N = 115) examined the effectiveness of moral dilemma discussion and of intrapersonal moral dilemma contemplation in promoting prosocial intentions among individuals in the context of a product-harm situation. The results confirm that moral dilemma discussion positively influences some forms of prosocial intentions. The results also suggest that moral dilemma discussion is not necessarily more effective than intrapersonal moral dilemma contemplation in promoting prosocial intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. F. (2014). When moral awareness isn’t enough: Teaching our students to recognize social influence. Journal of Management Education, 38, 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about Trolley Problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 536–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1999). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher, 28, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. E., & Liu, L. (2015). Social justice reasoning of education undergraduates: Effect of instruction in Moral Development Theory and Dilemma Discussion in the asynchronous online classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 11, 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (2011). What works in values education. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A report for policy makers and opinion leaders. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.

  • Binfet, T. (2004). It’s all in their heads: Reflective abstraction as an alternative to the moral discussion group. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, H., & Phillips, S. (1982). An intervention program for the development of empathy in student teachers. Journal of Psychology, 112, 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, M. M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effects of classroom moral discussion upon children’s level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4, 129–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J., & Smith, D. (2009). Increasing moral reasoning skills through online discussions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1249–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugh, D., Bazerman, M., & Banaji, M. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. Moore, D. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflict of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cikara, M., Farnsworth, R. A., Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). On the wrong side of the trolley track: Neural correlates of relative social valuation. Scan, 5, 404–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2014). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (1998). An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is Coefficient Alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R., Maddux, C. D., Cladianos, A., & Richmond, A. (2010). Moral reasoning of education students: The effects of direct instruction in moral development theory and participation in moral dilemma discussion. Teachers College Record, 112, 621–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. J. (2015). Dilemma-based approach to teaching ethics: Life lessons for family and consumer sciences college seniors. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 32(1), 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. R. (2016). I’m sorry I’m scared of litigation: Evaluating the effectiveness of apology laws. The Forum: A Tennessee Student Legal Journal, 3(1), Article 4.

  • De Matos, C. A., Henrique, J. L., & Vargas Rossi, C. A. (2007). Service recovery paradox: A meta-analysis. Journal of Service Research, 10, 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, P. D., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Butcher, S. B., & Dykstra, A. (2015). Please accept my sincere and humble apologies: The HEXACO model of personality and the proclivity to apologize. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrant, B. M., Devine, T. A., Maybery, M. T., & Fletcher, J. (2012). Empathy, perspective taking, and prosocial behaviour: The importance of parenting practices. Infant and Child Development, 21, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D. P., Wallace, J. D., & Chandler, R. C. (2012). Rehabilitating your organization’s image: Public relations professionals’ perceptions of the effectiveness and ethicality of image repair strategies in crisis situations. Public Relations Journal, 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K. R., & Rubin, M. S. (1995). Public relations vs. legal strategies in organizational crisis decisions. Public Relations Review, 21, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Salvador, R. (2008). Is management theory too ‘self-ish?’. Journal of Management, 34, 1127–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, R. E., & Jones, T. M. (1976). Moral reasoning: A teaching handbook for adapting Kohlberg to the classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Greenhaven Press.

  • Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36, 663–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearit, K. M. (2006). Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewko, S. J., Cooper, S. L., & Cummings, G. G. (2015). Strengthening moral reasoning through dedicated ethics training in dietetic preparatory programs. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47, 156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 103–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoger, E. A., & Swem, L. L. (2000). Public relations and the law in crisis mode: Texaco’s initial reaction to incriminating tapes. Public Relations Review, 26, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1985). Classroom conflict: controversy versus debate in learning groups. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (2008). Moral judgment and moral neuroscience: Intersections, definitions, and issues. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (2013). Why saying “I’m sorry” isn’t good enough: The ethics of corporate apologies. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 239–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1978). Relationship between cognitive perspective taking and teachers’ ratings of children’s behavior in grades one through four. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 132, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, D. A. (2000). The relationship between ethical dilemma discussion and moral development. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64, 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (2006). Effective moral education: The Konstanz method of dilemma discussion. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 3, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, A. L., Achen, R. M., & Dodd, R. K. (2015). Student perceptions of active learning. College Student Journal, 49, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, E., & O’Neill, P. (1992). What creates the dilemma in ethical dilemmas? Examples from psychological practice. Ethics and Behavior, 2, 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manika, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Bourlakis, M. (2017). Understanding the effects of a social media service failure apology: A comparative study of customers vs. potential customers. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manika, D., Wells, V. K., Gregory-Smith, D., & Gentry, M. (2015). The impact of individual attitudinal and organizational variables on workplace environmentally friendly behaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molewijk, B., Verkerk, M., Milius, H., & Widdershoven, G. (2008). Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: Process and outcome. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 11, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles, W. J. (1986). Effects of a moral development discussion group on delinquent and predelinquent boys. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylom, S., & Smids, J. (2016). The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied Trolley Problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19, 1275–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (2012). The trolley method of moral philosophy. Essays in Philosophy, 13, 242–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, J., & McGarr, O. (2014). The use of case-based learning in the development of student teachers’ levels of moral reasoning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliner, P. M. (1985). Legitimating and implementing prosocial education. Humbolt Journal of Social Relations, 13, 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, P. A. (1996). The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, A., & Reinsch, L. (2003). Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability. Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski, J. (2009). The role of learning theory in building effective college ethics curricula. Journal of College and Character, 10(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, F. C., & Power, A. M. (2012). Moral education. In P. M. Brown, M. W. Corrigan, & A. Higgins-D’Allesandro (Eds.), Handbook of prosocial education (pp. 179–196). Lantham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thomas, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. H., & Adler, G. S. (2014). The effects of unstructured group discussion on ethical judgment. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbennold, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review, 102, 460–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. W., & Howe, C. J. (1990). Effects of cognitive conflict and imitation on children’s socio-legal thinking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, R. O., Folger, R., & Priesemuth, M. (2012). Organizational apology and defense: Effects of guilt and managerial status. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24, 124–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, A., & de Ruyter, D. J. (2016). Individual moral development and moral progress. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9741-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaefli, A., Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1985). Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test. Review of Educational Research, 55, 319–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seriodio, A., Kopelman, B. I., & Bataglia, P. U. (2016). The promotion of medical students’ moral development: A comparison between a traditional course on bioethics and a course complemented with the Konstanz method of dilemma discussion. International Journal of Ethics Education, 1, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siomkos, G. J. (1989). Managing product-harm crises. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siomkos, G., & Shrivastava, P. (1993). Responding to product liability crises. Long Range Planning, 26(5), 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoe, E. E., Eisenberg, N., & Cumberland, A. (2002). The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 962–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: Volume 1 social and personal influences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Johnson, D. W. (1977). Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 679–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., & Fabrey, L. J. (1980). Effects of controversy and defensiveness on cognitive perspective-taking. Psychological Reports, 47, 1043–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W., & Kwan, K. (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 759–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. (1997). Liability means never being able to say you’re sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraints, and defensiveness in corporate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2007). The impact of a product harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science, 26, 230–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. D. (2012). Comments on John Martin Fischer’s Our Stories. Philosophical Studies, 158, 515–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1983). Sources of cognitive conflict for stage transition in moral development. Developmental Psychology, 19, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. P., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are overall measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (2015). Investigating and assessing the quality of employee ethics training programs among US-based global organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willhelm, W. J. (2008). Integrating instruction in ethical reasoning into undergraduate business courses. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 5, 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, L., & Ki, E. J. (2017). Organizational crisis communication on Facebook: A study of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Corporate Communications: An International Journal., 22, 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, California State University, Fullerton, 800 N. State College Blvd. SGMH 5313, Fullerton, CA, 92831, USA

    Rommel O. Salvador

Authors
  1. Rommel O. Salvador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rommel O. Salvador.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Principal component analysis matrix of scale items
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salvador, R.O. Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion. J Bus Ethics 156, 241–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3626-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation