Erratum to: J Bus Ethics DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3156-0
During conversion of the manuscript a typo has been introduced in below mentioned tables:
Table 1 panel A should read: “DOLLARS_OF_FINE”, “CHARGED_COSTS” and “THREAT_OF_SUSPENSION”
Table 1 panel B should read: “REINVESTIGATION”, “FUTURE_ACTION”, “PUBLISHED_EXTERNALLY” and “INVESTIGATION COSTS”
Table 2 should read: “PUBLIC_PERCENTAGE” and “GUILTY_PLEA”
Table 4 should read: “GUILTY_PLEA”
Tables 5 should read “GUILTY_PLEA”
Table 7 should read “GUILTY_PLEA” and misses the negative predicted sign on the interaction
The original article has been updated as to correct these tables, which are now accurately shown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3156-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mescall, D., Phillips, F. & Schmidt, R.N. Erratum to: Does the Accounting Profession Discipline Its Members Differently After Public Scrutiny?. J Bus Ethics 142, 407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3358-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3358-5