Skip to main content
Log in

Creating Ties That Bind

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of Donaldson and Dunfee (Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, 1999) offers an example of how normative and descriptive approaches to business ethics can be integrated. We suggest that to be truly integrative, however, the theory should explore the processes by which such integration happens. We, therefore, sketch some preliminary thoughts that extend Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) by beginning to consider the process by which microsocial contracts are connected to hypernorms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, D.: 2001, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: [1927]1954, The Public and Its Problems (Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio).

  • Donaldson, T., & T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & L. Preston: 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, The American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen) (MIT Press, Cambridge).

  • Harris, J. D., and R. E. Freeman: 2008, “The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1986, The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Moreland, M.: 2008, Business Ethics as Practice: Ethics as the Everyday Business of Business, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 2002, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1951, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, The Philosophical Review, 60 (1): 20-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1981, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1964, “How to Derive “Ought” From “Is”, The Philosophical Review, 73 (1): 43-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansbury, J.: 2009, “Reasoned Moral Agreement: Applying Discourse Ethics within Organizations”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 19 (1): 33-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: [1952]2001, Philosophical Investigations. (Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe) (Blackwell, Oxford).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Edward Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edward Freeman, R., Harris, J.D. Creating Ties That Bind. J Bus Ethics 88 (Suppl 4), 685–692 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0333-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0333-4

Keywords

Navigation