Abstract
Whistle-blowing is generally considered from the viewpoint of professional morality. Morality rejects the idea of choice and the interests of the professional as immoral. Yet the dreadful retaliations against the messengers of the truth make it necessary for morality to leave a way out of whistle-blowing. This is why it forges rights (sometimes called duties) to trump the duty to the public prescribed by professional codes. This serves to hide the obvious fact that whether to blow the whistle is indeed a choice, not a matter of objective duty. One should also notice that if it fails to achieve anything then blowing the whistle was the wrong decision (or maybe the right decision that nobody would want to make). There is nevertheless a tendency to judge it based on the motivation of the whistle blower. In a way, whistle blowers should strive to act like saints. Yet, it is logically impossible to hold both whistle-blowing as mandatory and whistle-blowers as heroes or saints. Moreover, this tends to value the great deeds of a few over the lives of the many, which is incompatible with the basic assumptions of morality. But consistency is not a main feature of professional morality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alford C. F. (2007) Whistle-Blower Narratives: The Experience of Choiceless Choice 74: 223–248
Bowie N. E., Duska R. F. (1990) Business Ethics second edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Carson, T. L., M. E. Verdu and R. E. Wokutch: (in press), ‘Whistle-Blowing for Profit: An Ethical Analysis of the Federal False Claims Act’, Journal of Business Ethics. In press, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9355-y.
Chappell, T.: 2006, ‘Bernard Williams’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/williams-bernard/
DeGeorge R.T. (2005) Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs sixth edition. NJ, Prentice Hall
Fleddermann, C.: 1999, Engineering Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Grant C. (2002) Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture. Journal of Business Ethics 39:391–399
Gunsalus C. K. (1998) How to Blow the Whistle and Still have a Career Afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics 4:51–64
Harris C.E., Pritchard M.S., Rabins M.J. (2005) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases third edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Kant, I.: 1785, The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
Mandeville, B.: 1714/1997, The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits (Hackett, Cambridge, MA)
Martin M. W. (2002) Personal Meaning and Ethics in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 8:545–560
Martin M. W. and Schinzinger R. (2005) Ethics in Engineering fourth edition. New York, McGraw-Hill
Nagel, T.: 1979, Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Near J. P. (1989) Whistle-Blowing: Encourage it!. Business Horizons 32:2–6
Near J.P. and Miceli M.P. (1996) Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality. Journal of Management 22:507–526
Nietzsche, F.: 1888, The Antichrist.
Oliver D. (2003) Whistle-Blowing Engineer. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 129: 246–256
Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap
Roddis W. M. K. (1993) Structural Failures and Engineering Ethics. Journal of Structural Engineering 119:1539–1555
Rothschild J. and Miethe T. D. (1999) Whistle-Blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation. Work and Occupations 26:107–128
Sartre, J.-P.: 1943, Being and Nothingness.
Williams B. (1981) Moral Luck. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Williams B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London, Routledge
Williams R. (2003) Education for the profession formerly known as engineering. The Chronicle of Higher Education 49(20):B12–B13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouville, M. Whistle-Blowing and Morality. J Bus Ethics 81, 579–585 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9529-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9529-7