Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between General Ethical Judgments and Copying Behavior at Work

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic technologies, in general, and computer-oriented technologies specifically have had a tremendous impact on all aspects of business. One area of increased concern is the protection of intellectual properties -- notably copyrights -- within the boundaries of the broadly defined technology industry. While the ability to share copyrighted information has always existed at the most basic levels, the advent of the information age has allowed the sharing of this information to take place in potentially greater quantities and without a loss of quality. As such, copying creates a major threat to industries dealing in the production and distribution of copyrightable creations. The focus of this paper is to better understand how the ethical judgments of employees regarding the opportunities to recreate copyrighted works via traditional and newer technologies impact assessments of copying behavior in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Geophysical Union et al. v. Texaco Inc.: 1992, 60 F. 3d 913–941.

  • D. Banerjee T. P. Cronan T. W. Jones (1998) ArticleTitle‘Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics’ MIS Quarterly 22 IssueID2 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Software Alliance: 2003, U.S. Software: State Piracy Study, Washington, DC (August).

  • T. Claburn (2001) ArticleTitlePursuing Pirates Ziff Davis Smart Business 14 IssueID9 38

    Google Scholar 

  • Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C., Secs. 101 et seq.

  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act: 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860.

  • Digital Theft Deterrence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999, amending Copyright Act section 504(c), H. R. 3456, P. L. 106–160 (106th Cong. 1st Sess. 1999)[ELR 21:8:9].

  • Evangelista, B.: 2002, ‘Deleting Downloads: Companies Concerned over Employees’ File-sharing at Work’, San Francisco Chronicle (June 3), E1.

  • D. R. Forsyth (1980) ArticleTitle‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 IssueID1 175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • GVU’s WWW User Survey: 1998, http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/user_surveys/Survey-1998–04/ Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • W.A. Jones SuffixJr. (1990) ArticleTitle‘Student Views of ‘Ethical’ Issues: A Situational Analysis’ Journal of Business Ethics 9 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Jordan (2000) ArticleTitleDownload Clampdown Federal Computer Week 14 IssueID31 29

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Y. Kuo M. H. Hsu (2001) ArticleTitle‘Development and Validation of Ethical Computer Self-efficacy Measure: The Case of Softlifting’ Journal of Business Ethics 32 IssueID2 299–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.: 2001, ‘U.S. Arrests Russian Cryptographer as Copyright Violator’, New York Times (New York, NY) (July 18), C8.

  • Lowry’s Reports v. Legg Mason: 2004, 302 F. Supp. 2d 455–464.

  • Lubell, S.: 2003, ‘Campuses Move to Block Music Sharing’, New York Times (New York, NY) (October 2), G7.

  • D. Mroz (2002) ArticleTitleTrends: Employers Facing Liability for Their Employees’ Copyright Infringement E-Commerce Law & Strategy 19 IssueID3 1

    Google Scholar 

  • P. E. Mudrack (1993) ArticleTitle‘An Investigation into the Acceptability of Workplace Behaviors of a Dubious Ethical Nature’ Journal of Business Ethics 12 IssueID7 517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Muncy S. J. Vitell (1992) ArticleTitle‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’ Journal of Business Research 24 IssueID4 297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc: 2001, United Kingdom House of Lords 38 (July 12).

  • No Electronic Theft (NET) Act: 1997, P.S. 105–147.

  • J. C. Nunnally (1978) Psychometric Theory EditionNumber2 McGraw-Hill New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasha Publications v. Enmark Gas Corp.: 1992, 19 Media Law Reporter 2062 (March 10).

  • M. A. Pierce J. W. Henry (2000) ArticleTitle‘Judgements about Computer Ethics: Do Individual, Co-Worker and Company Judgements Differ? Do Company Codes Make a Difference?’ Journal of Business Ethics 28 IssueID4 307–323

    Google Scholar 

  • W. G. Porter M. C. Griffaton (2003) ArticleTitle‘Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Monitoring the Electronic Workplace’ Defense Counsel Journal 70 IssueID1 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Y. A. Rawwas G. L. Patzer M. L. Klassen (1995) ArticleTitle‘Consumer Ethics in Cross-Cultural Settings: Entrepreneurial Implications’ European Journal of Marketing 29 IssueID7 62–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Recording Industry Association of America: 1999, ‘Frequently Asked Questions’, http://www.riaa.com/ piracy/pirans.htm (November 1).

  • Rural Telephone Service Company v. Feist Publications, Inc.: 1991, 499 U.S. 340.

  • Society of Financial Service Professionals: 2001, Survey on Technology & Ethics, Bryn Mawr, PA (March).

  • J.C. Sterling (2004) ArticleTitleSad Songs: Employer Liability for Employees Downloading Music at Work Connecticut Employment Law Letter 12 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Towle v. Ross et al.: 1940, 32 F. Supp. 125.

  • Universal City Studios et al. v. Reimerdes et al.: 2001, 111 F. Supp. 2d 346 (SDNY).

  • S. J. Vitell J. A. Muncy (1991) ArticleTitle‘Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer’ Journal of Business Ethics 11(August) 585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Vitell J. A. Lumpkin M. Y. A. Rawwas (1991) ArticleTitle‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumer’ Journal of Business Ethics 10(May) 365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal: 1998, ‘‘Titanic’ Gets Added Distinction: Most-Pirated Film’ (May 1).

  • Wall v. Brunell: 1997, 75 C. P. R. (3d) 429; 1997 C.P.R. LEXIS 1218 Federal Court, Trial Division May 13.

  • R. E. Wilkes (1978) ArticleTitle‘Fraudulent Behavior by Consumers’ Journal of Marketing 42(October) 67–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy A. Suter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suter, T.A., Kopp, S.W. & Hardesty, D.M. The Relationship Between General Ethical Judgments and Copying Behavior at Work. J Bus Ethics 55, 61–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1779-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1779-z

Keywords

Navigation