Abstract
Purpose
The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a key role in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) is involved in the regulation of EMT. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological significance of LCN2 expression in breast cancer.
Methods
The expression of LCN2 protein was immunohistochemically assessed in two well-characterised annotated cohorts of breast cancer (discovery cohort, n = 612; validation cohort, n = 1363). The relationship of LCN2 expression and subcellular location with the clinicopathological factors and outcomes of patients was analysed.
Results
Absent or reduced nuclear LCN2 expression was associated with features of aggressive behaviour, including high histological grade, high Nottingham Prognostic Index, high Ki67 labelling index, hormone receptor negativity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity. The high cytoplasmic expression of LCN2 was correlated with lymph node positivity. The nuclear downregulation of LCN2 was correlated with the overexpression of EMT associated proteins (N-cadherin and Twist-related protein 2) and basal biomarkers (cytokeratin 5/6 and epidermal growth factor receptor). Unlike the cytoplasmic expression of LCN2, the loss of nuclear expression was a significant predictor of poor outcome. The combinatorial expression tumours with high cytoplasmic and low nuclear expression were associated with the worst prognosis.
Conclusions
Tumour cell expression of LCN2 plays a role in breast cancer progression with loss of its nuclear expression which is associated with aggressive features and poor outcome. Further functional analysis is warranted to confirm the relationship between the subcellular localisation LCN2 and behaviour of breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cancer Research UK (2019) Breast cancer statistics/Statistics by cancer type/Cancer Statistics for the UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer. Accessed 04 June 2019
Cheng G, Sun X, Wang J et al (2014) HIC1 silencing in triple-negative breast cancer drives progression through misregulation of LCN2. Cancer Res 74:862–872
Wang HH, Wu MM, Chan MW et al (2014) Long-term low-dose exposure of human urothelial cells to sodium arsenite activates lipocalin-2 via promoter hypomethylation. Arch Toxicol 88:1549–1559
Ören B, Urosevic J, Mertens C et al (2016) Tumour stroma-derived lipocalin-2 promotes breast cancer metastasis. J Pathol 239:274–285
Yang J, McNeish B, Butterfield C et al (2013) Lipocalin 2 is a novel regulator of angiogenesis in human breast cancer. FASEB J 27:45–50
Liao CJ, Li PT, Lee YC et al (2013) Lipocalin 2 induces the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in stressed endometrial epithelial cells: possible correlation with endometriosis development in a mouse model. Reproduction 147:179–187
Kim SL, Lee ST, Min IS et al (2017) Lipocalin 2 negatively regulates cell proliferation and epithelial to mesenchymal transition through changing metabolic gene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci 108:2176–2186
Wang YP, Yu GR, Lee MJ et al (2013) Lipocalin-2 negatively modulates the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma through the epidermal growth factor (TGF-beta1)/Lcn2/Twist1 pathway. Hepatology 58:1349–1361
Fernández CA, Yan L, Louis G et al (2005) The matrix metalloproteinase-9/neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin complex plays a role in breast tumor growth and is present in the urine of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 11:5390–5395
Leung L, Radulovich N, Zhu CQ et al (2012) Lipocalin2 promotes invasion, tumorigenicity and gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 7(10):e46677
Feng M, Feng J, Chen W et al (2016) Lipocalin2 suppresses metastasis of colorectal cancer by attenuating NF-κB-dependent activation of snail and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Mol Cancer 15:77
Tung MC, Hsieh SC, Yang SF et al (2013) Knockdown of lipocalin-2 suppresses the growth and invasion of prostate cancer cells. Prostate 73:1281–1290
Leng X, Ding T, Lin H et al (2009) Inhibition of lipocalin 2 impairs breast tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res 69:8579–8584
Shi H, Gu Y, Yang J et al (2008) Lipocalin 2 promotes lung metastasis of murine breast cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 27:83
Uhlen M, Zhang C, Lee S (2017) A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 357:2507
Aleskandarany MA, Abduljabbar R, Ashankyty I et al (2016) Prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in invasive breast cancer: transcriptomic and protein expression analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 159:215–227
Rakha EA, Agarwal D, Green AR et al (2017) Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer. Histopathology 70:622–631
Rakha EA, Elsheikh SE, Aleskandarany MA et al (2009) Triple-negative breast cancer: distinguishing between basal and nonbasal subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 15:2302–2310
Green AR, Powe DG, Rakha EA et al (2013) Identification of key clinical phenotypes of breast cancer using a reduced panel of protein biomarkers. Br J Cancer 109:1886–1894
Rakha EA, Soria D, Green AR et al (2014) Nottingham Prognostic Index Plus (NPI+): a modern clinical decision making tool in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 110:1688–1697
Aleskandarany MA, Green AR, Ashankyty I et al (2016) Impact of intratumoural heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158:287–295
Muftah AA, Aleskandarany MA, Al-Kaabi MM et al (2017) Ki67 expression in invasive breast cancer: the use of tissue microarrays compared with whole tissue sections. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:341–348
Kurozumi S, Joseph C, Sonbul S et al (2018) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of Ras association and pleckstrin homology domains 1 (RAPH1) in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 172(1):61–68
Kurozumi S, Joseph C, Sonbul S et al (2018) Clinical and biological roles of Kelch-like family member 7 in breast cancer: a marker of poor prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:525–533
Kurozumi S, Joseph C, Raafat S et al (2019) Utility of ankyrin 3 as a prognostic marker in androgen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176:63–73
McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS et al (1985) Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109:716–721
Detre S, Saclani Jotti G, Dowsett MA (1995) “Quickscore” method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 48:876–878
Wu Y, Sarkissyan M, Vadgama JV (2016) Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer. J Clin Med 5:E13
Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X et al (2011) Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 121:2750–2767
Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y et al (2013) Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 19:5533–5540
Nagi C, Guttman M, Jaffer S et al (2005) N-cadherin expression in breast cancer: correlation with an aggressive histologic variant–invasive micropapillary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94:225–235
Aleskandarany MA, Sonbul S, Surridge R et al (2017) Rho-GTPase activating-protein 18: a biomarker associated with good prognosis in invasive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 117:1176–1184
Fang X, Cai Y, Liu J et al (2011) Twist2 contributes to breast cancer progression by promoting an epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like cell self-renewal. Oncogene 30:4707–4720
Hanai J, Mammoto T, Seth P et al (2005) Lipocalin 2 diminishes invasiveness and metastasis of Ras-transformed cells. J Biol Chem 280:13641–13647
Yang J, Bielenberg DR, Rodig SJ et al (2009) Lipocalin 2 promotes breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3913–3918
Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874
Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752
Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10:5367–5374
Kurozumi S, Yamaguchi Y, Matsumoto H et al (2018) Comparing protein and mRNA expressions of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Med Mol Morphol 52:90–98
Green AR, Soria D, Stephen J et al (2016) Nottingham Prognostic Index Plus: validation of a clinical decision making tool in breast cancer in an independent series. J Pathol Clin Res 2:32–40
Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B et al (2017) ExteNET Study Group (2017) Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1688–1700
Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB et al (2012) CLEOPATRA Study Group (2012) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366:109–119
Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D et al (2006) Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2733–2743
Lee EK, Kim HJ, Lee KJ et al (2011) Inhibition of the proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by lipocalin 2 through blockade of JNK and PI3 K/Akt signaling. Int J Oncol 38:325–333
Leng X, Lin H, Ding T et al (2008) Lipocalin 2 is required for BCR-ABL-induced tumorigenesis. Oncogene 27:6110–6119
Bauer M, Eickhoff JC, Gould MN et al (2008) (NGAL) is a predictor of poor prognosis in human primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:389–397
Wenners AS, Mehta K, Loibl S et al (2012) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clinical outcome in primary human breast cancer. PLoS ONE 7:e45826
Rodvold JJ, Mahadevan NR, Zanetti M (2012) Lipocalin 2 in cancer: when good immunity goes bad. Cancer Lett 316:132–138
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Breast Cancer Now Tissue Bank and the University of Nottingham and Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Funding
This research was funded by the Pathological Society Trainees Small Grant Application (No: 2201) and the University of Nottingham (Nottingham Life Cycle 6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
KS has received research grants from CHUGAI Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants
This study was approved by the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 2 (Reference title: Development of a molecular genetic classification of breast cancer). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurozumi, S., Alsaeed, S., Orah, N. et al. Clinicopathological significance of lipocalin 2 nuclear expression in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 179, 557–564 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05488-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05488-2