Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the pCR rate and toxicity of the addition of weekly carboplatin (Cp) to paclitaxel (wP) and dose-dense (dd) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in an open-label phase II study in TNBC patients.
Methods
Patients were included if they had stage II and III TNBC and received wP (80 mg/m2/week) concurrent with weekly Cp (AUC = 2) for 12 weeks, followed by bi-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for four cycles, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pCR [(ypT0/isypN0)]. Secondary endpoints included safety and drug delivery.
Results
Sixty-three eligible patients were included. Median age was 51 years (range 29–74); 88.9% had stage II disease, 46% were clinically node positive, and 77.8% had grade 3 tumors. Fifty-four percent achieved a pCR. Twelve percent missed two or more doses of wP, whereas at least two cycles of EC were missed in 9.5%. The rate of tolerance without delays or dose reductions is very low (16%). Sixty-two percent had G3/4 neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 patients of which more than eighty percent occurred during EC despite primary prophylaxis with G-CSF. Thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was noticed in 11 pts. Three patients developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion
The addition of weekly carboplatin to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and dd EC leads to a pCR rate comparable to prior studies (54%). However, hematological toxicity and febrile neutropenia rate was unexpectedly high. Future investigations could focus on reversing the sequence, which may lead to better hematological tolerability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 406:747–752
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874
Castrellon AB, Pidhorecky I, Valero V, Reaz LE (2017) The role of carboplatin in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Oncol Rev 11:324
Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R et al (2010) Metastatic behaviour of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277
Szekely B, Silber AL, Pusztai L et al (2017) New therapeutic strategies for triple negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston park) 31:130–137
Denkert C, Liedtke C, Tutt A, von Minckwitz G (2017) Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer: the road to new treatment strategies. Lancet 389:2430–2442
Stockmans G, Deraedt K, Wildiers H, Moerman P, Paridaens R (2008) Triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 20:614–620
Collignon J, Lousberg L, Schroeder H, Jerusalem G (2016) Triple-negative breast cancer and solutions. Breast Cancer 8:93–107
Yang F, Kemp CJ, Henikoff S (2015) Anthracyclines induce double-strand DNA breaks at active gene promotors. Mutat Res 773:9–15
Oualla K, El-zawahry HM, Arun B et al (2017) Novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 9:493–511
Bonilla L, Ben-Aharon I, Vidal L et al (2010) Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1845–1854
Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M et al (2018) Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann of Oncol 7:1497–1508
Petrelli F, CoinuA Borgonovo K et al (2014) The value of platinum agents as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:223–232
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172
Tchrakian N, Flanagan L, Harford J (2016) New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for Her2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of her2 positive breast cancers. Virchows Arch 468:207–211
Decoster L, Kenis C, Van Puyvelde K et al (2013) The influence of clinical assessment (including age) and geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 4:235–241
Pinder SE, Provenzano E, Earl H et al (2007) Laboratory handling and histology reporting of breast specimensfrom patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 50:409–417
Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T et al (2010) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA-1 positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379
D’Andrea AD (2010) Susceptibility pathways in Fanconi’s anemia and breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1909–1919
Loibl S, o’Shaughnessy J, Untch M et al (2018) Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:497–509
Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM et al (2015) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple negative breast cancer. CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:13–21
von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple negative and Her2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomized phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:747–756
Alba E, Chacon JI, Anton A et al (2012) A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting: results from the GEICAM/2006-03 multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136:487–493
Sharam P, Lopez-Tarruella S et al (2017) Efficacy of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer: combined analysis of two cohorts. Clin Cancer Res 23(3):649–657
Tutt A, Tovey H, Cheang MCU et al (2018) Carboplatin in BRCA 1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT trial. Nat Med 24:628–637
Acknowledgements
We want to acknowledge all the co-investigators of the BSMO, the pathology departments, data nurses of the participant sites, and the patients.
Funding
The study was financially supported by Amgen and Teva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fontaine, C., Renard, V., Van den Bulk, H. et al. Weekly carboplatin plus neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based regimen in early triple-negative breast cancer: a prospective phase II trial by the Breast Cancer Task Force of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 176, 607–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05259-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05259-z