Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Weekly carboplatin plus neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based regimen in early triple-negative breast cancer: a prospective phase II trial by the Breast Cancer Task Force of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO)

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the pCR rate and toxicity of the addition of weekly carboplatin (Cp) to paclitaxel (wP) and dose-dense (dd) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in an open-label phase II study in TNBC patients.

Methods

Patients were included if they had stage II and III TNBC and received wP (80 mg/m2/week) concurrent with weekly Cp (AUC = 2) for 12 weeks, followed by bi-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for four cycles, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pCR [(ypT0/isypN0)]. Secondary endpoints included safety and drug delivery.

Results

Sixty-three eligible patients were included. Median age was 51 years (range 29–74); 88.9% had stage II disease, 46% were clinically node positive, and 77.8% had grade 3 tumors. Fifty-four percent achieved a pCR. Twelve percent missed two or more doses of wP, whereas at least two cycles of EC were missed in 9.5%. The rate of tolerance without delays or dose reductions is very low (16%). Sixty-two percent had G3/4 neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 patients of which more than eighty percent occurred during EC despite primary prophylaxis with G-CSF. Thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was noticed in 11 pts. Three patients developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.

Conclusion

The addition of weekly carboplatin to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and dd EC leads to a pCR rate comparable to prior studies (54%). However, hematological toxicity and febrile neutropenia rate was unexpectedly high. Future investigations could focus on reversing the sequence, which may lead to better hematological tolerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 406:747–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castrellon AB, Pidhorecky I, Valero V, Reaz LE (2017) The role of carboplatin in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Oncol Rev 11:324

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R et al (2010) Metastatic behaviour of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Szekely B, Silber AL, Pusztai L et al (2017) New therapeutic strategies for triple negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston park) 31:130–137

    Google Scholar 

  6. Denkert C, Liedtke C, Tutt A, von Minckwitz G (2017) Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer: the road to new treatment strategies. Lancet 389:2430–2442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stockmans G, Deraedt K, Wildiers H, Moerman P, Paridaens R (2008) Triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 20:614–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collignon J, Lousberg L, Schroeder H, Jerusalem G (2016) Triple-negative breast cancer and solutions. Breast Cancer 8:93–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang F, Kemp CJ, Henikoff S (2015) Anthracyclines induce double-strand DNA breaks at active gene promotors. Mutat Res 773:9–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Oualla K, El-zawahry HM, Arun B et al (2017) Novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 9:493–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonilla L, Ben-Aharon I, Vidal L et al (2010) Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1845–1854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M et al (2018) Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann of Oncol 7:1497–1508

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petrelli F, CoinuA Borgonovo K et al (2014) The value of platinum agents as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:223–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tchrakian N, Flanagan L, Harford J (2016) New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for Her2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of her2 positive breast cancers. Virchows Arch 468:207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Decoster L, Kenis C, Van Puyvelde K et al (2013) The influence of clinical assessment (including age) and geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 4:235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinder SE, Provenzano E, Earl H et al (2007) Laboratory handling and histology reporting of breast specimensfrom patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 50:409–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T et al (2010) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA-1 positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Andrea AD (2010) Susceptibility pathways in Fanconi’s anemia and breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1909–1919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Loibl S, o’Shaughnessy J, Untch M et al (2018) Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:497–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM et al (2015) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple negative breast cancer. CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple negative and Her2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomized phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alba E, Chacon JI, Anton A et al (2012) A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting: results from the GEICAM/2006-03 multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136:487–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharam P, Lopez-Tarruella S et al (2017) Efficacy of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer: combined analysis of two cohorts. Clin Cancer Res 23(3):649–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tutt A, Tovey H, Cheang MCU et al (2018) Carboplatin in BRCA 1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT trial. Nat Med 24:628–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge all the co-investigators of the BSMO, the pathology departments, data nurses of the participant sites, and the patients.

Funding

The study was financially supported by Amgen and Teva.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christel Fontaine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fontaine, C., Renard, V., Van den Bulk, H. et al. Weekly carboplatin plus neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based regimen in early triple-negative breast cancer: a prospective phase II trial by the Breast Cancer Task Force of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 176, 607–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05259-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05259-z

Keywords

Navigation