Abstract
The turbulence-kinetic-energy dissipation rate is a fundamental property in turbulent flows, but its direct measurement in the atmospheric surface layer is still a challenge. Indirect estimates are often obtained from inertial-subrange laws using turbulence statistics of the longitudinal velocity component. In this study, synthetic turbulence data are used to investigate the impact of path-averaging effects present in sonic anemometer data on the inertial subrange of the second-order structure function. Path averaging reduces the energy levels in the second-order structure function, creating a negative bias in the estimates of the dissipation rate. The effect is dependent on the path-averaging transfer function, mean wind speed and path length. A simple correction for the bias on the basis of existing transfer functions is applied and tested with data obtained from two separate sonic anemometers. Compared to the spectrum, the second-order structure function after the correction becomes the optimum statistical measure for indirect estimation of the dissipation rate, due to its lower random error and insensitivity to aliasing effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertson JD, Parlange MB, Kiely G, Eichinger WE (1997) The average dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy in the neutral and unstable atmospheric surface layer. J Geophys Res Atmos 102(D12):13423–13432. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03346
Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2010) Random data, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Cancelli DM, Dias NL, Chamecki M (2012) Dimensionless criteria for the production–dissipation equilibrium of scalar fluctuations and their implications for scalar similarity. Water Resour Res 48(W10522):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012127
Chamecki M, Dias NL (2004) The local isotropy hypothesis and the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the atmospheric surface layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130(603):2733–2752. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.155
Chamecki M, Dias NL, Salesky ST, Pan Y (2017) Scaling laws for the longitudinal structure function in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 74(4):1127–1147. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0228.1
Chamecki M, Dias NL, Freire LS (2018) A TKE-based framework for studying disturbed atmospheric surface layer flows and application to vertical velocity variance over canopies. Geophys Res Lett 45(13):6734–6740. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077853
Davidson P (2004) Turbulence, an Introduction for scientists and engineerers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Davidson P, Krogstad PÅ (2014) A universal scaling for low-order structure functions in the log-law region of smoothand rough-wall boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 752:140–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.286
Dias NL (2017) Smoothed spectra, ogives, and error estimates for atmospheric turbulence data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 166(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0293-7
Fairall CW, Larsen SE (1986) Inertial-dissipation methods and turbulent fluxes at the air–ocean interface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 34(3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122383
Fuentes JD, Chamecki M, dos Santos RMN, Randow CV, Stoy PC, Katul G, Fitzjarrald D, Manzi A, Gerken T, Trowbridge A, Freire LS, Ruiz-Plancarte J, Maia JMF, Tóta J, Dias N, Fisch G, Schumacher C, Acevedo O, Mercer JR (2016) Linking meteorology, turbulence, and air chemistry in the Amazon rainforest. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97(12):2329–2342. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00152.1
Gobbi MF, Chamecki M, Dias NL (2006) Application of digital filtering for minimizing aliasing effects in atmospheric turbulent surface layer spectra. Water Resour Res 42(3):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004374
Henjes K (1998) Justification of the inertial dissipation technique in anisotropic mean flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88(2):161–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001138218181
Horst TW, Oncley SP (2006) Corrections to inertial-range power spectra measured by Csat3 and solent sonic anemometers, 1. Path-averaging errors. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119(2):375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9015-7
Horst TW, Semmer SR, Maclean G (2015) Correction of a non-orthogonal, three-component sonic anemometer for flow distortion by transducer shadowing. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155(3):371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0010-3
Hsieh CI, Katul GG (1997) Dissipation methods, Taylor’s hypothesis, and stability correction functions in the atmospheric surface layer. J Geophys Res Atmos 102(D14):16391–16405. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00200
Jiménez j (1998) Turbulent velocity fluctuations need not be Gaussian. J Fluid Mech 376:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112098002432
Juneja A, Lathrop DP, Sreenivasan KR, Stolovitzky G (1994) Synthetic turbulence. Phys Rev E 49:5179–5194. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.49.5179
Kaimal JC, Wyngaard JC, Haugen DA (1968) Deriving power spectra from a three-component sonic anemometer. J Appl Meteorol 7(5):827–837. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007%3C0827:DPSFAT%3E2.0.CO;2
Kaimal JC, Wyngaard JC, Izumi Y, Coté OR (1972) Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence. Q J R Meteorol Soc 98(417):563–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707
Lumley JL (1964) The spectrum of nearly inertial turbulence in a stably stratified fluid. J Atmos Sci 21(1):99–102. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021%3C0099:TSONIT%3E2.0.CO;2
Monin A, Yaglom A (1981) Statistical fluid mechanics, volume II: mechanics of turbulence, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pan Y, Chamecki M (2016) A scaling law for the shear-production range of second-order structure functions. J Fluid Mech 801:459–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.427
Poggi D, Katul G, Albertson J (2006) Scalar dispersion within a model canopy: measurements and three-dimensional lagrangian models. Adv Water Resour 29(2):326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.12.017
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Salesky ST, Chamecki M (2012) Random errors in turbulence measurements in the atmospheric surface layer: implications for Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. J Atmos Sci 69(12):3700–3714. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-096.1
Shinozuka M, Deodatis G (1991) Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Appl Mech Rev 44(4):191–204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501
Smalikho IN, Banakh VA, Pichugina YL, Brewer WA, Banta RM, Lundquist JK, Kelley ND (2013) Lidar investigation of atmosphere effect on a wind turbine wake. J Atmos Ocean Technol 30(11):2554–2570. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00108.1
Warhaft Z (2000) Passive scalars in turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):203–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.203
Webb EK (1964) Ratio of spectrum and structure-function constants in the inertial subrange. Q J R Meteorol Soc 90(385):344–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709038520
Wilson JD (2000) Trajectory models for heavy particles in atmospheric turbulence: comparison with observations. J Appl Meteorol 39(11):1894–1912. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039%3C1894:TMFHPI%3E2.0.CO;2
Zahn E, Chor TL, Dias NL (2016) A simple methodology for quality control of micrometeorological datasets. Am J Environ Eng 6(4A):135–142. https://doi.org/10.5923/s.ajee.201601.20
Acknowledgements
LSF was funded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) under research Grant 401019/2017-9; NLD was also funded by CNPq under research Grants 444462/2014-7 and 303581/2013-1. We thank Fernando Armani, Rodrigo Branco Rodakoviski, Lucas Emilio B. Hoeltgebaum, André Luís Diniz dos Santos, Bianca Luhm Crivellaro and Dornelles Vissotto Junior for data collection and post processing of the Rio Verde dam experiment, and André Luiz Grion for insightful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freire, L.S., Dias, N.L. & Chamecki, M. Effects of Path Averaging in a Sonic Anemometer on the Estimation of Turbulence-Kinetic-Energy Dissipation Rates. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 173, 99–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00453-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00453-4