Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular Evidence for an Extreme Genetic Bottleneck During Introduction of an Invading Grass to California

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although exotic species cause tremendous economic and ecological loss, we know relatively little about the post-introduction evolutionary dynamics of the invasive species themselves. Barbed goatgrass, Aegilops triuncialis L., is a cleistogamous annual grass with a native range throughout the Mediterranean Basin and Asia and introduced to California during the last century. It is considered a serious noxious range weed and is one of the few exotic plant species that is invading serpentine soil habitats. We examined whether patterns of molecular variation are consistent with a single or multiple introduction events into California and further, if individual populations show evidence for a genetic bottleneck during introduction. Fingerprinting patterns, using microsatellite loci derived from Triticum aestivum, were investigated for 57 Eurasian accessions, broadly spanning the native range and for 108 individuals from 11 localities in California. There is strong evidence for an extreme bottleneck in this species as it colonizes its new range because we detected only three multilocus genotypes occurring in California and 36 genotypes in Eurasia. In California one of the genotypes differs from one other by only one fragment and only occurs in one individual. This suggests two separate introductions. Each population is composed of highly uniform individuals and the two main genotypes are geographically separated. A. triuncialis is still expanding its range in California despite genomic uniformity after a strong bottleneck and its recently increased rate of spread is not correlated to a high within-population variability created by multiple introductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker HG (1965) In: Baker HG and Stebbins GL (eds) The Genetics of Colonizing Species, pp 147–172. Academic Press, New York.

  • Bandopadhyay R, Sharma S, Rustgi S, Singh R, Kumar A, Balyan HS and Gupta PK (2004). DNA polymorphism among 18 species of Triticum–Aegilops complex using wheat EST–SSRs. Plant Science 166: 349–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bataillon TM (2000). Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations. Heredity 84: 497–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM and Vitousek PM (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubcovsky J and Dvorak J (1994). Genome origins of Triticum cylindricum, Triticum triunciale and Triticum ventricosum (Poaceae) inferred from variation in restriction patterns of repeated nucleotide-sequences – a methodological study. American Journal of Botany 81(10): 1327–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC and Schierenbeck KA (2000). Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 7043–7050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enserink M (1999). Predicting invasions: Biological invaders sweep in. Science 285: 1834–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS and Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group Limited, Essex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin JF and Schaal BA (2002). Hybrid Tamarix widespread in US invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 11256–11259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegde SG, Valkoun J and Waines JG (2000). Genetic diversity in wild wheats and goat grass. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101(1–2): 309–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen WC (1929). Goatgrass – a weed pest of the range. The Monthly Bulletin, Dept. of Agriculture, State of California 18: 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy PB (1928). Goatgrass or wild wheat (Aegilops triuncialis). Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 20: 1292–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Rodríguez Schettino L, Chamizo Lara A, Larson A and Losos JB (2004). Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1984). California serpentines: Flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE (2002). Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993). Biological invasions – lessons for ecology. Trends In Ecology and Evolution 8(4): 133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Kendall D, Connor J and Simberloff D (1998). Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277: 1088–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN and Erneberg M (2002). The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89(2): 176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vila M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S and Beardsley B (2004). Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecological Monographs 74(2): 261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson LA and Reaser JK (2003). Bioinvasions, bioterrorism and biosecurity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(6): 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Murai K and Tsunewaki K (1986). Molecular basis of genetic diversity among cytoplasms of Triticum and Aegilops species. IV. CtDNA variation in A. triuncialis. Heredity 57: 335–339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M and Li W-H (1979). Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76(10): 5269–5273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak SJ and Mack RN (1995). Allozyme diversity in the apomictic vine Bryonia alba (Cucurbitaceae) – potential consequences of multiple introductions. American Journal of Botany 82: 1153–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pester TA, Ward SM, Fenwick AL, Westra P and Nissen SJ (2003). Genetic diversity of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) determined with RAPD and AFLP markers. Weed Science 51: 287–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters A, Johnson DE and George MR (1996). Barb goatgrass: a threat to California rangelands. Rangelands 18: 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R and Morrison D (2000). Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50: 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P and Ganal MW (1998). A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149: 2007–2023

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2000). NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.1. Exeter Publications, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW and Holt JS (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton JP, McKay JK and Sala A (2002). Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow Saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecological Applications 12: 1652–1660

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D and Schmitz DC (1997). As invasive species threat intensifies, US steps up fight. Issues In Science And Technology 15(3): 25–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE and Soltis PS (2000). The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 7015–7057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot MW and Smith LS (1930). The goatgrass situation in California. The Monthly Bulletin, Dept. of Agriculture, State of California 19: 40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuillet AC, Bru D, David J, Roumet P, Santoni S, Sourdille P and Bataillon T (2002). Direct estimation of mutation rate for ten microsatellite loci in durum wheat, Triticum turgidum (L.) Thell. ssp durum desf. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(1): 122–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • (1994). Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Ambylopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 94: 37–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanichanon A, Blake NK, Sherman JD and Talbert LE (2003). Multiple origins of allopolyploid Aegilops triuncialis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106(5): 804–810

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1986). Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference?. In: Mooney, HA and Drake, J (eds) Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii, pp 163–167. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1990). Biological invasions and ecosystem processes – towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57(1): 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker NF, Hulme PE and Hoelzel AR (2003). Population genetics of an invasive species, Heracleum mantegazzianum: implications for the role of life history, demographics and independent introductions. Molecular Ecology 12: 1747–1756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Miyashita NT and Tsunewaki K (1997). Plasmon analyses of Triticum (wheat) and Aegilops: PCR-single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analyses of organellar DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94: 570–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Meimberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meimberg, H., Hammond, J.I., Jorgensen, C.M. et al. Molecular Evidence for an Extreme Genetic Bottleneck During Introduction of an Invading Grass to California. Biol Invasions 8, 1355–1366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-2463-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-2463-7

Keywords

Navigation