Abstract
The present study assessed the factor structure and etiology of traditional perseverative and nonperseverative errors, and six narrowly defined errors that occur during the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST). A computer-administered version of the WCST, designed to maximize the variance in a nonclinical sample, was used. Phenotypic factor analysis and twin models were used to examine the structure and genetic and environmental etiology in 191 monozygotic and 165 dizygotic adolescent twin pairs. Factor analysis did not support the traditional division of errors into perseverative and nonperseverative errors. Heritability of individual indices was small to moderate (a2 = 0.10 – 0.42), with varying significance. Estimates of shared environment (c2 = 0.00 – 0.14) were not significant. The best fitting multivariate genetic model had one genetic factor, with specific variance and covariance due to nonshared environmental influences. These results suggest that there are common underlying genetic influences on WCST indices, along with index-specific environmental variance that does not correspond to the traditional division between perseverative and nonperseverative errors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andres P (2003) Frontal cortex as the central executive of working memory: time to revise our view. Cortex 39:871–895
Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Ralano A (2003) Genetic influences on frontal brain function: WCST performance in twins. Neuroreport 14:1975–1978
Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant JD, Heath AC (2010) Developmental and genetic influences on prefrontal function in adolescents: A longitudinal twin study of WCST performance. Neurosci Lett 472:119–122
Barcelo F (1999) Electrophysiological evidence of two different types of error in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuroreport 10:1299–1303
Barcelo F, Knight RT (2002) Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Neuropsychologia 40:349–356
Berg EA (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol 39:15–22
Bowden SC, Fowler KS, Bell RC, Whelan G, Clifford CC, Ritter AJ, Long CM (1998) The reliability and internal validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychol Rehabil 8:243–254
Buchsbaum BR, Greer S, Chang WL, Berman KF (2005) Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Task and component processes. Hum Brain Mapp 25:35–45
Campana A, Macciardi F, Gambini O, Scarone S (1996) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) performance in normal subjects: a twin study. Neuropsychobiology 34:14–17
Chou LN, Kuo PH, Lin CC, Chen WJ (2010) Genetic and environmental influences on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in healthy adolescents: a twin/sibling study. Behav Genet 40:22–30
Demakis GJ (2003) A meta-analytic review of the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Neuropsychology 17:255–264
Friedman NP, Miyake A, Young SE, DeFries JC, Corley RP, Hewitt JK (2008) Indiviudal differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. J Exp Psychol Gen 137:201–225
Giancola PR, Mezzich AC (2003) Executive functioning, temperament, and drug use involvement in adolescent females with a substance use disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(6):857–866
Grant DA, Berg EA (1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J Exp Psychol 38:404–411
Greve KW, Stickle TR, Love JM, Bianchini KJ, Stanford MS (2005) Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: a confirmatory factor analytic study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20:355–364
Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtis G (1993) Wisconsin card sorting test manual: revised and expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3:424–453
Kimberg DY, D’esposito M, Farah MJ (1997) Effects of bromocriptine on human subjects depend on working memory capacity. Neuroreport 6:3581–3585
Kremen WS, Eisen SA, Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ (2007) Is the Wisconsin card sorting test a useful neurocognitive endophenotype? Am J Med Genet B: Neuropsychiatr Genet 144:403–406
Li CS (2004) Do schizophrenia patients make more perseverative than non-perseverative errors on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test? A meta-analytic study. Psychiatr Res 129(2):179–190
Milner B (1963) Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Arch Neurol 9:101–110
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49–100
Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO (2000) A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev 20(1):113–136
Moritz S, Birkner C, Kloss M, Jahn H, Hand I, Haasen C et al (2002) Executive functioning in obsessive-compulsive disorder, unipolar depression, and schizophrenia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 17(5):477–483
Mountain MA, Snow WG (1993) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a measure of frontal pathology: a review. Clin Neuropsychol 7:108–118
Neale MC, Maes HH (1999) Methodology for genetic studies of twin and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers B.V, Dordrecht, Netherlands
Neale M, Boker S, Xie G, Maes H (1999) Mx: Statistical Modeling. Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Richmand, VA
Nichols RC, Bilbro WC Jr (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Stat Med 16:265–275
Nieuwenstein MR, Aleman A, de Haan EH (2001) Relationship between symptom dimensions and neurocognitive functioning in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of WCST and CPT studies. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Continuous Performance Test. J Psychiatr Res 35(2):119–125
Nyhus E, Barcelo F (2009) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: a critical update. Brain Cogn 71:437–451
Pennington BF, Ozonoff S (1996) Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 37(1):51–87
Rabin LA, Barr WB, Burton LA (2005) Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: a survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20:33–65
Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1994) A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes. Neuropsychol Rev 4:161–198
Rhea SA, Gross AA, Haberstick BC, Corley RP (2006) Colorado twin registry. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6):941–949
Roberts ME, Tchanturia K, Stahl D, Southgate L, Treasure J (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of set-shifting ability in eating disorders. Psychol Med 37(8):1075–1084
Szoke A, Schurhoff F, Mathieu F, Meary A, Ionescu S, Leboyer M (2005) Tests of executive functions in first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 35(6):771–782
Taylor J (2007) Heritability of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Stroop Color-Word Test performance in normal individuals: Implications for the search for endophenotypes. Twin Res Hum Genet 10:829–834
Willcutt EG, Doyle AE, Nigg JT, Faraone SV, Pennington BF (2005) Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biol Psychiatry 57(11):1336–1346
Acknowledgments
We thank Marie Banich for support and assistance with the manuscript and Sally Ann Rhea for coordination of data collection. This research was supported by National Institute of Health grants MH063207, DA0111015, MH079485, T32HD002789, and T32MH15442.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by Yoon-Mi Hur.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godinez, D.A., Friedman, N.P., Rhee, S.H. et al. Phenotypic and Genetic Analyses of the Wisconsin Card Sort. Behav Genet 42, 209–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9502-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9502-1