Abstract
My intention is not to get into specific, detailed historical observation about the ways that led the term ‘democracy’ to take on its current meaning, in science as much as in politics, but rather to establish a comparison between the models that political science proposes and interprets as important for the existence of democracy and those that science illustrates as indicators of scientific knowledge constructed in a democratic form. The debate about the contemporary meaning of democracy has generated an extraordinary diversification of models of democracy: from technocratic conceptions of government to conceptions of social life that include widespread political participation. And it is exactly for this reason that the assumption of a specific point of view on the question we are dealing with inevitably brings with it the choice of a model suitable to describe democratic form as a form of politics without further explanation, that is, as a political system with which science measures itself as a cultural category. In this sense, we can consider the passage from the concept of democracy to that of politics and generally of science to be a peaceful one, since politics has been appointed with that set of behaviours and democratic practices (including science) that political culture demands for the social benefit. This demand can be met only on condition that structural obstacles are removed and new cultural and epistemological mediators are introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamsen R (2004) The power of partnerships in global governance. Third World Quarterly 25:1453–1467
Aucoin P (1996) Political science and democratic governance. Can J Polit Sci 29:643–660
Ben David J (1984) The scientist’s role in society: a comparative study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bobbio N (1985) Che cos’è la democrazia? Fondazione Einaudi, Torino
Bodei R (2001) Passioni politiche. In: AA.VV La politica, perché? Riflessioni sull’agire politico. Donzelli, Milano
Boncinelli E (2006) Le forme della vita. Einaudi, Torino
Bonito Oliva R, Cantillo G (eds) (2000) Natura e cultura. Guida, Napoli
Brandi MC et al. (2005) Giovani e scienza in Italia tra attrazione e distacco. J Sci Commun 4 (2). http://jcom.sissa.it/
Brown RH (1998) Toward a democratic science. Yale University Press, New Haven
Castelfranchi Y, Pitrelli N (2007) Come si comunica la scienza? Laterza, Roma-Bari
Cavalli Sforza LL (2004) L’evoluzione della cultura. Codice, Torino
Coniglione F (2008) Popper addio. Dalla crisi dell’epistemologia alla fine del logos occidentale. Bonanno, Acireale-Roma
Etzkowitz H (2088) The triple helix: universities-industry-government. Routledge, London
Finocchiaro MA (2005) Retrying Galileo, 1633–1992. University of California Press, Berkeley
Forge J (1998) Responsibility and the Scientist. In: Bridgstock M, Burch D, Forge J, Laurent J, Lowe I (eds) Science, tecnology and society. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fuller S (2004) In search of vehicles for knowledge governance: on the need for institutions that creatively destroy social capital. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Gallino L (2002) Globalizzazione e diseguaglianze. Laterza, Roma-Bari
Gallino L (2007) Tecnologia e democrazia. Einaudi, Torino
Gauchet M (2001) I diritti umani come politica. Micromega 5:135–152
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, Boston
Held D (2007) Modelli di democrazia. Il Mulino, Bologna
Jasanoff S (2005) Fabbriche della natura: Milano: Il Saggiatore, 2008
Kaufmann M (2007) Anarchia illuminata. Una introduzione alla filosofia politica, Liguori
Lorenz K (1974) Civilized man’s eight deadly sins. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
Morpurgo Tagliabue G (1963) I processi di Galileo e l’epistemologia. Edizioni di Comunità, Milano
Nickles T (2009) Vantaggio competitivo e futuro del capitalismo: uno sguardo al contesto. In: Coniglione F (ed) Nello specchio della scienza. Mondadori, Milano
Nicolais L (2007) Ricerca, innovazione e rete di competenze. In: Maccacaro T (ed) La ricerca tradita. Garzanti, Milano
Plotkin H (1994) Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sartori G (1993) Democrazia. Cosa è? Milano: RCS, 2007
Schroeder R (2007) Rethinking science, technology and social change. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Tabellini G (2007) Ricerca e sviluppo economico. In: Maccacaro T (ed) La ricerca tradita. Garzanti, Milano
Tanese A, Negro G, Gramigna A (eds) (2003) La customer satifaction nele amministrazioni pubbliche: valutare la qualità percepita dai cittadini. Rubettino, Soveria Mannelli
Turner S (2004) Quasi-science and the state: “governing science” in comparative perspective. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Valente A (2004) Comunicare la scienza per partecipare la scienza. In: Valente A, Luzi D (eds) Partecipare la scienza. Biblink, Roma
Valente A (2006) Science: from specialists to students and back again. Biblink, Roma
Van den Daele W (2004) Traditional knowledge in modern society. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Zagrelbesky G (1995) Il “crucifige” e la democrazia. Einaudi, Torino
Ziman J (2002) La vera scienza. Dedalo, Bari
Acknowledgments
I say thanks to Francesco Coniglione, Thomas Nickles and Enrico Viola for their open-mindedness, extraordinary patience, and friendly support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vasta, S. A New “Essential Tension” for Rationality and Culture. What Happens if Politics Tries to Encounter Science Again. Axiomathes 20, 129–143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9082-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9082-3