Skip to main content
Log in

(Math, Science, ?)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In science as in mathematics, it is popular to know little and resent much about category theory. Less well known is how common it is to know little and like much about set theory. The set theory of almost all scientists, and even the average mathematician, is fundamentally different from the formal set theory that is contrasted against category theory. The latter two are often opposed by saying one emphasizes Substance, the other Form. However, in all known systems of mathematics throughout history, mathematicians have moved fluidly between ideas conceived of as thing-like, property-like, and process-like. On the other hand one way to advance science is to better distinguish between thing, property, and process. All this constitutes a distracting background for those interested in, or distressed by, the possible application of category theory to science, and to mathematics as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelli GA (2008) Logicism, quantifiers, and abstraction. http://orion.uci.edu/~aldo/papers/FONA.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Baez J (2008) Categorifying fundamental physics. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/diary/fqxi_narrative.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Baez JC, Dolan J (1998) Categorification. In: E Getzler, M Kapranov (eds) Higher category theory. Contemp. Math. 230, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, pp 1–36. arXiv:math/9802029v1. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Barr M (1999) Functional set theory. ftp://ftp.math.mcgill.ca/pub/barr/pdffiles/varset.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Benacerraf P (1965) What numbers could not be. Philos Rev 74:47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ (2008) The evolutionary and developmental foundations of mathematics. PLoS Biol 6(2):e19. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060019 Cited 1 Sept 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 103:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge MA (1977) The furniture of the world (vol 3 of Treatise on basic philosophy). Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge MA (1997 [2001]) Moderate mathematical fictionism. In: M Mahner (ed) Scientific realism: selected essays of Mario Bunge. Prometheus, Amherst, pp 187–203

  • Cantlon JF, Brannon EM (2007) Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS Biol 5(12):e328. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050328 Cited 1 Sept 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E (1923 [2004]) Substance and function and Einstein’s theory of relativity. Dover, Mineola, New York

  • Chow T (1996) A short proof of the rook reciprocity theorem. Electron J Comb 3(1): R10. http://www.combinatorics.org/Volume_3/PDFFiles/v3i1r10.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Diester I, Nieder A (2007) Semantic associations between signs and numerical categories in the prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biol 5:e294. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050294 Cited 1 Sept 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehresmann A, Vanbremeersch J-P (2007) Memory evolutive systems: hierarchy, emergence, cognition. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg S, Mac Lane S (1945) General theory of natural equivalences. Trans Am Math Soc 58:231–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden BR (1998) Physics from fisher information: a unification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gárcía-Sucre M (1990) On the relationship between mathematics and physics. In: Weingartner P, Dorn GJW (eds) Studies on mario bunge’s treatise. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt R (1984) Topoi, the categorial analysis of logic. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol 98. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Halmos PR (1974) Naive set theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kary M, Mahner M (2002) How would you know if you synthesized a thinking thing? Mind Mach 12:61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry E, Marquis J-P (2005) Categories in context: historical, foundational, and philosophical. Philos Math (III) 13:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawvere FW (1963) Functorial semantics of algebraic theories. PhD thesis, Columbia University. http://tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/5/tr5abs.html. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Lawvere FW (1965 [2005]) An elementary theory of the category of sets (long version) with commentary. Repr Theory Appl Categ 11: 5–35. ftp://ftp.tac.mta.ca/pub/tac/html/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Lawvere FW (1966) The category of categories as a foundation for mathematics. In: Eilenberg S et al (eds) Proceedings of the conference on categorical algebra, La Jolla, 1965. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawvere FW (2003) Foundations and applications: axiomatization and education. Bull Symb Logic 9:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawvere FW, Schanuel SH (1998) Conceptual mathematics: a first introduction to categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Letelier J-C, Soto-Andrade S, Guíñez Abarzúa F, Cornish-Bowden A, Cárdenas ML (2006) Organizational invariance and metabolic closure: analysis in terms of (M, R) systems. J Theor Biol 238(4):949–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui SH (1997) An interview with Vladimir Arnol’d. Notices Am Math Soc 44(4):432–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis J-P (1995) Category theory and the foundations of mathematics: philosophical excavations. Synthese 103:421–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis J-P (2002) Categories, sets and the nature of mathematical entities. PILM 2002, Philosophical insights into logic and mathematics: the history and outcome of alternative semantics and syntax. Nancy, France. http://www.univ-nancy2.fr/poincare/colloques/symp02/abstracts/marquis.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Nieder A, Miller EK (2003) Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quian Quiroga R, Reddy L, Kreiman G, Koch C, Fried I (2005) Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435(23):1102–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1958a) A relational theory of biological systems. Bull Math Biophys 20:245–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1958b) The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories. Bull Math Biophys 20:317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1959) A relational theory of biological systems II. Bull Math Biophys 21:109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalizi C (2000) Laboring to bring forth a mouse. (Review of Frieden 1998, physics from fisher information). Bactra Rev 118. http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/reviews/physics-from-fisher-info/. Cited 1 Sept 2008

  • Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C (2003) Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Animal Cognit 6:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdravkovska S (1987) Conversation with Vladimir Igorevich Arnol’d. Math Intell 9(4):28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kary, M. (Math, Science, ?). Axiomathes 19, 321–339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9064-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9064-5

Keywords

Navigation