Abstract
Philosophers seldom ask questions regarding how certain phenomena occur, because such questions tend to be the province of the sciences or of technology. However, the question how pictures have depth requires philosophical reflection because it takes place on the surface of pictorial objects and involves both physical and phenomenal, i.e. aesthetic, features of those surfaces. This essay examines how pictures have depth by first separating the aesthetic question from interpretive considerations, and thereby refining the question how pictures have depth. Next it explicates two sorts of conceptual tools required to understand the question: several complex concepts needed to understand surfaces, and the concept of intensity. These are then used to understand how pictures can have depth by showing how intensities produce both an aesthetic surface and depth within it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Clagett (1968) Nicole Oresme and the Medieval Geometry of Qualities and Motions: A Treatise on the Uniformity and Difformity of Intensities Known as Tractatus de Configurationibus Qualitatum et Motuum The university of Wisconsin Press Madison Wisconsin 167
Claude, L. S.:1973, Tristes Tropiques (trans. John and Doreen Weightman) London, Jonathan Cape, p. 181, 192.
Danto, A.: 1998, ‘Restoration and Meaning:’ Willard O. Eddy Lecture, Colorado State University.
Deleuze, G.: 1994,. Difference and Repetition (trans. Paul Patton) Columbia University Press, p. 232ff.
Kant, I.: 1965, Critique of Pure Reason (trans. Norman Kemp Smith) New York: St. Martins Press, pp. 201–212 [A 166/B207-A181/B224].
S. K. Langer (1953) Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art developed from Philosophy in a New Key Charles Scribner’s Sons New York 83
B. Russell (1903) Principles of Mathematics W.W. Norton & Company Inc New York 253
A. Stroll (1988) Surfaces University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis 14–65