Skip to main content
Log in

Critique of Hames and Blanchard (2012), Clancy (2012), and Ryniker (2012) on Hebephilia, Anthropological Data, and Maladaptiveness

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Pubescence means “having reached puberty or the age at which the sex glands have become functional but not fully mature” (http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Pubescence). In the West today, for example, a 14-year-old is generally still pubescent, as he or she is usually not fully sexually mature (cf. Blanchard et al., 2009). Thus, an older person’s erotic attraction or behavior with respect to a pubescent person is hebephilic.

  2. Hames and Blanchard’s cite was “Whiting et al. (2009).”

  3. Hames and Blanchard cited Table 33 as being on p. 385, but it actually appeared on pp. 284–285.

  4. In the U.S. and Canada, men are just as likely to end up in a forensic sample (e.g., that of Blanchard et al., 2009) for fondling or oral sex with pubescent girls—or just chatting sexually with them online, looking at erotic pictures of them, or even reading erotic stories about them—as they are for vaginal intercourse. All these behaviors count as “sex,” not just coitus.

  5. Notably, the difference between means of 1.30 and 1.39 for hebephiles and teleiophiles is trivial. Even though they were statistically significantly different in Blanchard’s (2010) study, the effect size of the difference was minute (r = .03), which is the appropriate metric for interpreting these results (Rind & Yuill, 2012).

  6. Schlegel (1995) was also a secondary source, as she was merely citing Whiting et al. (1986).

References

  • Anderson, S. E., Dallal, G. E., & Must, A. (2003). Relative weight and race influence average age at menarche: Results from two nationally representative surveys of US girls studied 25 years apart. Pediatrics, 111, 844–850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R. (2010). The fertility of hebephiles and the adaptationist argument against including hebephilia in DSM-5 [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 817–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., et al. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, K. (2012, Jan 18). Interrogating claims about natural sexual behavior: More on deep thinking hebephile. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/context-and-variation/2012/01/18/interrogating-claims-about-natural-sexual-behavior-more-on-deep-thinkinghebephile/. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Frances, A. (2011, Dec 15). Hebephilia is a crime, not a mental disorder. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/frances/content/article/10168/2006997. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of “hebephilia”: A response to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R., & Blanchard, R. (2012). Anthropological data regarding the adaptiveness of hebephilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 745–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. (2008). Early sexual maturity among Pumé foragers of Venezuela: Fitness implications of teen motherhood. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136, 338–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. L., Greaves, R. D., & Ellison, P. T. (2009). Early reproductive maturity among Pumé foragers: Implications of a pooled energy model to fast life histories. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 430–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology, 16, 2234–2238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., & Yuill, R. (2012). Hebephilia as mental disorder? A historical, cross-cultural, sociological, cross-species, non-clinical empirical, and evolutionary review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 797–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryniker, D. C. (2012). Hebephilia and male fertility [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 741–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, A. (1995). A cross-cultural approach to adolescence. Ethos, 23,15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak, M. (1983). Nisa, the life and words of a !Kung woman. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. S., Gurven, M., Hill, K., Migliana, A., Chagnon, N. A., Hames, R., et al. (2006). Growth rates and life histories in twenty-two small-scale societies. American Journal of Human Biology, 18, 295–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2011). Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS One, 6(4), e19066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, J. W. M., Burbank, V. K., & Ratner, M. S. (1986). The duration of maidenhood across cultures. In J. B. Lancaster & B. A. Hamburg (Eds.), School-age pregnancy and parenthood (pp. 273–302). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Whiting, J. W. M., Burbank, V. K., & Ratner, M. S. (2009). The duration of maidenhood across cultures. In E. H. Chasdi (Ed.), Culture and human development: The selected papers of John Whiting (pp. 282–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Rind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rind, B. Critique of Hames and Blanchard (2012), Clancy (2012), and Ryniker (2012) on Hebephilia, Anthropological Data, and Maladaptiveness. Arch Sex Behav 42, 685–691 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0132-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0132-y

Keywords

Navigation