Abstract
Men and women living in a rural community in Bakossiland, Cameroon were asked to rate the attractiveness of images of male or female figures manipulated to vary in somatotype, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), secondary sexual traits, and other features. In Study 1, women rated mesomorphic (muscular) and average male somatotypes as most attractive, followed by ectomorphic (slim) and endomorphic (heavily built) figures. In Study 2, amount and distribution of masculine trunk (chest and abdominal) hair was altered progressively in a series of front-posed male figures. A significant preference for one of these images was found, but the most hirsute figure was not judged as most attractive. Study 3 assessed attractiveness of front-posed male figures which varied only in length of the non-erect penis. Extremes of penile size (smallest and largest of five images) were rated as significantly less attractive than three intermediate sizes. In Study 4, Bakossi men rated the attractiveness of back-posed female images varying in WHR (from 0.5–1.0). The 0.8 WHR figure was rated markedly more attractive than others. Study 5 rated the attractiveness of female skin color. Men expressed no consistent preference for either lighter or darker female figures. These results are the first of their kind reported for a Central African community and provide a useful cross-cultural perspective to published accounts on sexual selection, human morphology and attractiveness in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ecology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.
Bolonchuk, W. W., Siders, W. A., Lykken, G. I., & Lukaski, H. C. (2000). Association of dominant somatotype of men with body structure, function during exercise, and nutritional assessment. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 167–180.
Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432, 345–352.
Buss, D. M., & Schmidt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Cheek, M., Pollard, B. J., Darbyshire, I., Onana, J. M., & Wild, C. (Eds.) (2004). The plants of Kupe, Mwanenguba and the Bakossi Mountains, Cameroon: A conservation checklist. Richmond, Surrey, England: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Diamond, J. (1997). Why is sex fun: The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39.
Ejepedang-Koge S. N. (1986). Tradition of a people-Bakossi. Yaounde, Cameroon: ARC Publications.
Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. H. Barlow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267–288). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Fessler, D. M. T., Nettle, D., Afshar, Y., de Andrade Pinheiro, I., Bolyanatz, A., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., et al. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of the role of foot size in physical attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 267–276.
Frost, P. (1988). Human skin color: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 32, 38–58.
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.
Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth. American Journal of Human Biology, 10, 341–350.
Law-Smith, M. J. L., Perret, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwall, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 273, 135–140.
Lynch, S. M., & Zellner, D. A. (1999). Figure preference in two generations of men: The use of figure drawings illustrating differences in muscle mass. Sex Roles, 40, 833–843.
Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L. E., Cornellisenm, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet, 353, 1500.
Marlowe, F. W., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.
Mealey, L. (1997). Bulking up: The roles of sex and sexual orientation as attempts to manipulate sexual attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 223–228.
Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence for unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.
Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., & Burt, D. M. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 268, 617–623.
Perret, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., & Burt, D. M. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.
Potts, M. & Short, R. V. (1999). Ever since Adam and Eve: The evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schultze, S., Knussmann, R., & Christiansen, K. (1991). Male sex role identification and body build. Homo, 42, 203–215.
Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of men. New York: Harpers.
Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals & human sexuality (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singh, D. (1993). Body shape and women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 297–321.
Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Sodhi, V. K., & Sausker, W. F. (1988). Dermatoses of pregnancy. American Family Physician, 37, 131–138.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptions of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual conflict (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornellisen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 266, 211–218.
Van Der Berghe, P. L., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87–113.
Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1998). How universal are preferences for female waist to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza from Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 228–229.
Wong, R., & Ellis, C. N. (1984). Physiologic skin changes in pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 10, 929–943.
Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Morgan, B. et al. Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness: Sexual Preferences of Men and Women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Arch Sex Behav 36, 369–375 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8