Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internationalization of latecomer firms from emerging economies—The role of resultant and autonomous learning

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tests the prescience of John Mathews’ linkage-leverage-learning (LLL) model to explain internationalization by latecomer firms (LFs)—set in an evolutionary backdrop. The hypothesis harbored in this study is that while LLL explains how LFs initially compete in international markets, it is autonomous learning, independent of LLL that is crucial to internationalization. We used panel data from 1994 to 2012 with 821 observations from 69 firms and performed multiple econometric analyses to test our hypotheses. Our results suggest that autonomous learning rather than resource leverage and learning through linkages with MNCs explain the success of Indian pharmaceutical LFs. LFs progress from being a recipient of knowledge in a global production network to a phase where they can become important contributors in the global innovation network. This study therefore demonstrates that LFs that invest in autonomous learning in addition to reaping advantages through their linkages with global innovators are the ones that are successful in their internationalization process and are able to become dominant players in the global market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, A. (2007). Pharmaceutical industry. In N. Kumar, & K. J. Joseph (Eds.). International competitiveness and knowledge-based industries in India: 143–184. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, B., & Harrison, A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3): 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (1989). Diffusion of development: The late-industrializing model and greater East Asia. American Economic Review, 81(2): 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (1995). Like the rest: South East Asia’s ‘late’ industrialisation. Journal of International Development, 7(5): 791–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S. (2005). The Indian software industry and its evolving service capability. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3): 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S., & Godley, A. (2009). Internationalization and technological leapfrogging in the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2): 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S., Kale, D., & Ramani, S. V. (2009). Experimentation with strategy and the evolution of dynamic capability in the Indian pharmaceutical sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4): 729–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). EMNE Catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade-off between output and innovation capabilities. Global Strategy Journal, 2: 205–223.

  • Barney, J. B., & Mackey, T. B. (2005). Testing resource-based theory. In. D. J. Ketchen, & D. D. Bergh (Eds.). Research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 2: 1–13. Bingley: Emerald Group.

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151–166.

  • Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Mathews, J. A. (2007). Accelerated internationalization by emerging market’s multinationals: The case of the white goods sector. Journal of World Business, 42: 369–383.

  • Branstetter, L.G. (2000). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. NBER working paper no. 8015, Deptartment of Economics, University of California, Davis.

  • Bromfield, T., & Barnard, H. (2010). The evolution of the intellectual property management strategy of an emerging multinational: Learning the purpose of patenting and scientific publications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1): 118–131.

  • Buckley, P. J., Munjal, S., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. (2016). Cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals: Asset exploitation or asset augmentation?. International Business Review, 25: 986–996.

  • Chataway, J., Tait, J., & Wield, D. (2007). Frameworks for pharmaceutical innovation in developing countries—The case of Indian pharma. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(5): 697–708.

  • Chen, L. C. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan’s machine tools industry. Research Policy, 38: 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., & Ray, S. (2007). Internationalization paths of Indian pharmaceutical firms—A strategic group analysis. Journal of International Management, 13(3): 338–355.

  • Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2009). Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1): 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D. S., Kim, D. J., & Rhee, D. K. (1998). Latecomer strategies: Evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Organization Science, 9(4): 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.

  • Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Dhanaraj, C. (2015). Leveraging India: Global interconnectedness and locational competitive advantage. Management International Review, 55(2): 159–179.

  • Contractor, F.J, Kumar, V., & Kundu S.K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 401–417.

  • Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., Kundu, S. K., & Pedersen, T. (2010). Reconceptualising the firm in a world of outsourcing and offshoring: The organizational and geographic relocation of high value company functions. Journal and Management Studies, 47(8): 1417–1433.

  • Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. (2014). What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501. 

  • De, S., & Dutta, D. (2007). Impact of intangible capital on productivity and growth: Lessons from the Indian information technology software industry. Economic Record, 83: S73–S86.

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., & Park, D. (2008). Old wine in new bottels: A comparison of emerging-markets TNCs today and developed country TNCs thirty years ago. In K. P. Sauvant (Ed.). The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity?: 158–180. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Duysters, G., Jacob, J., Lemmens, C., & Jintian, Y. (2009). Internationalization and technological catching up of emerging multinationals: A comparative case study of China’s Haier group. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2): 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31: 1417–1429.

  • Franco, E., Ray, S., & Ray, P. K. (2011). Patterns of innovation practices of multinational-affiliates in emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil and India. World Development, 39(7): 1249–1260.

  • Gaffney, N., Kedia, B., & Clampit, J. (2013). A resource dependence perspective of EMNE FDI strategy. International Business Review, 22: 1092–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2010). A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviours: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 377–396.

  • Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management, 20: 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl-Sampath, P. (2006). Indian pharma within global reach?. UNU-MERIT working paper no. 2006–031, United Nations University, Maastricht.

  • Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge:The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2015). International search behavior of business group affiliated firms: Scope of institutional changes and intragroup heterogeneity. Organization Science, Forthcoming.

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317.

  • Ham, R. M., & Mowery, D. C. (1998). Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: Case studies at a US weapons laboratory. Research Policy, 26: 661–675.

  • Helpman, E. (1992). Endogenous macroeconomic growth theory. European Economic Review, 36: 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23(7): 1171–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H., & Zhang, L. (2015). Catch-up of Chinese pharmaceutical firms facing technological complexity. International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 12(4): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, N. K., Pangarkar, N., Yuan, L., & Kumar, V. (2015). Internationalization of Indian software firms through establishment of global development centers: A contingency perspective. Multinational Business Review, 23(2): 90–110.

  • Johansson, J, & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 22–31.

  • Kale, D., & Little, S. (2007). From imitation to innovation: The evolution of R&D capabilities and learning processes in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(5): 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2): 867–891.

  • Kim, L. (2000). Responding to crisis in Korea, Part 2: An assessment of reforms to the national innovation system. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 3(1–2):10–16.

  • Kim, L. (2003). The dynamics of technology development: Lessons from the Korean experience. In S. Lall, & S. Urata (Eds.). Competitiveness, FDI and technological activity in East Asia: 143–167. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Technology, learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characterstics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43: 279–293.

  • Kumar, N., & Joseph, K. J. (2007). International competitiveness and knowledge-based industries in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • Kumar, V., Mudambi, R., & Gray, S. (2013). Internationalization, innovation and institutions: The 3 I’s underpinning the competitiveness of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 19(3): 203–206.

  • Kumar, V., & Singh, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of Indian pharmaceutical firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(5): 321–330.

  • Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 368–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2): 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1993). Promoting technology development: The role of technology transfer and indigenous effort. Third World Quarterly, 14(1): 95–108.

  • Lall, S. (1994). The east Asian miracle: Does the bell toll for industrial strategy?. World Development, 22(4): 645–654.

  • Lall, S. (1995). Developing industrial technology: Lessons for policy and practice, World Bank operations evaluation study. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Lall, S. (1996). Paradigms of development: The East Asian debate on industrial policy. In S. Lall (ed.). Learning from the Asian tigers studies in technology and industrial policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Lall, S. (2000). Selective industrial and trade policies in developing countries: Theoretical and empirical issues. QEH working paper series no. QEHWPS 48, Queen Elizabeth House, Oxford University.

  • Lall, S. (2003). Competitiveness FDI and technological activity in East Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Lall, S. (2005). Understanding FDI-assisted economic development. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Lall, S., & Narula, R. (2004) Foreign direct investment and its role in economic development: Do we need a new agenda?. European Journal of Development Research, 16(3): 447–464.

  • Lall, S., & Urata, S. (2003). Competitiveness FDI and technological activity in East Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Lall, S., Weiss, J., & Zhang, J. (2006). The “sophistication” of exports: A new trade measure. World Development, 34(2): 222–237.

  • Lamin, A., & Ramos, M. A. (2016). R&D investment dyanmics in agglomerations under weak appropriability regimes: Evidence from Indian R&D labs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3): 604–621.

  • Li, J., & Kozhikode, R. K. (2009). Developing new innovation models: Shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management. Journal of International Management, 15(3): 328–339.

  • Liu, J. W., & Ray, P. K. (2012). The ‘triple-alliance’ perspective for new industry creation: Lessons from the flat panel industry in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Economics, 23: 585–599.

  • Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13: 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. and Wang, S.L. 2012. Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2: 244–261.

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

  • Mathews, J. A. (2001). National systems of economic learning: The case of technology diffusion management in East Asia. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5/6): 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2002a). Competitive advantage of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2002b). Dragon multinational: Towards a new model of global growth. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

  • Mathews, J. A. (2003). Competitive dynamics and economic learning: An extended resource-based view. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1): 115–145.

  • Mathews, J. A. (2006). Catch-up strategies and the latecomer effect in industrial development. New Political Economy, 11(3): 413–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A., & Cho, D. S. (2000). Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mathews, J. A., & Snow, C. C. (1998). A conversation with the Acer Group’s Stan Shih on global strategy and management. Summer: Organizational Dynamics.

  • Mathews, J. A., & Zander, I. (2007). The international entrepreneurial dynamics of accelerated internationalisation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 387–403.

  • Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.

  • Narula, R., & Lall, S. (2006). Understanding FDI-assisted economic development. London: Routledge.

  • Nelson, R. R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorising about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33: 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (2008). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1): 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2): 23–46.

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.

  • Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global value chains meet innovation systems: Are there learning opportunities for developing countries?. World Development, 39(7): 1261–1269.

  • Popli, M., & Kumar, V. (2016). Jumping from springboard? The role of marginal cultural distance in cross-border M&A deal completion. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(6): 527–536.

  • Popli, M., Akbar, M., Kumar, V., & Gaur, A. S. (2017). Performance impact of temporal strategic fit: Entrainment of internationalization with pro-market reforms. Global Strategy Journal. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1160.

  • Pradhan, J. P., & Alakshendra, A. (2006). Overseas acquisition versus greenfield foreign investment: Which internationalization strategy is better for Indian pharmaceutical enterprises. ISID Working Paper, 2006(07): 5–70.

  • Prahlad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May–June: 79–90.

  • Purkayastha, S., Kumar, V., & Lu, J. (2017). Business group heterogeneity and the internationalization-performance relationship: Evidence from Indian business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2): 247–279.

  • Ramachandran, J., Mukherji, S., & Sud, M. (2006). Strategic entrepreneurship in a globalizing economy: Evidence from emerging economies. IIMB Management Review: 291–302.

  • Ramamurti, R. (2001). Developing countries and MNEs: Extending and enriching the research agenda. Journal of international Business Studies, 35: 277–283.

  • Ray, P., & Ray, S. (2010). Resource constrained innovation for emerging economies: The case of the Indian telecommunications industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1): 144–156.

  • Ray, P. K., & Rahman, S. (2006). Transnational corporations, innovation, and inter-firm linkages in developing countries. Transnational Corporations, 15(2): 71–98.

  • Ray, P. K., & Venaik, S. (2001). Foreign firms and local linkages: A study of comparative behaviour of multinational-affiliates and local enterprises in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(46/47): 4385–4391.

  • Ray, S. (2013). Innovation strategy in emerging market firms in response to institutional transition under TRIPs: The case of the Indian pharmaceuticals industry. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.

  • Reddy, M., & Zhao, L. (1990). International technology transfer: A review. Research Policy, 19: 285–307.

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simon, D., Hitt, M., & Ireland, D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32: 273–292.

  • Stucchi, T., Pedersen, T., & Kumar, V. (2015). The effect of institutional evolution on Indian firms’ internationalization: Disentangling inward- and outward-oriented effects. Long Range Planning, 48(5): 346–359.

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 450–463.

  • Teece, D. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45: 8–37.

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533.

  • Thite, M., Wilkinson, A., Budhwar, P., & Mathews, J. A. (2016). Internationalization of emerging Indian multinationals: Linkage, leverage and learning (LLL) perspective. International Business Review, 25: 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, V., Rissing, B. A., Gereffi, G., Trumpbour, J., & Engardio, P. (2008). The globalization of innovation: Pharmaceuticals: Can India and China cure the global pharmaceutical market. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1143472. Accessed 1/11/2012.

  • Yiu, D. (2011). Multinational advantage of Chinese business groups: A theoretical exploration. Management & Organization Review, 7(2): 249–277.

  • Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3): 189–219.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Mike Peng, Ravi Ramamurthy and John Mathews whose feedback helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, UNSW School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

    Pradeep Kanta Ray

  2. Discipline of International Business, University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Sangeeta Ray & Vikas Kumar

Authors
  1. Pradeep Kanta Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sangeeta Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vikas Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, P.K., Ray, S. & Kumar, V. Internationalization of latecomer firms from emerging economies—The role of resultant and autonomous learning. Asia Pac J Manag 34, 851–873 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9527-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9527-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation