Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An automated approach to estimate human interest

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can we model and estimate interest? In general, when an individual engages with an object, say Facebook, Instagram, a Mobile game, or anything else, we know that there is some interest that the person has in the object. However, we do not have a procedure that can tell us by “how much” of a factor is the person interested. Simply put, can we find a “number” for someone’s interest? In this article, we propose the design of a framework that can handle this issue. We formulate the interest estimation problem as a state estimation problem and deduce interest indirectly from the activity. Activity, stimulated by interest, is measured via a subjective-objective weighted approach. Further, we present a novel continuous-time model for interest by drawing inspiration from Physics and Economics simultaneously. We model interest along the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in Physics and improve the performance by borrowing ideas from Stochastic Volatility Models in Economics. Subsequently, we employ particle filter to solve the interest estimation problem. To validate the feasibility of the proposed theory in practice, we investigate the model by conducting numerical simulations on real-world datasets. The results demonstrate good performance of the framework, and thus match the theoretical expectations from the method. Lastly, we implement the framework in practice and deploy it as a RESTful service, thereby providing a uniform interface for accessing the procedure via any remote or local application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hidi S, Renninger KA (2006) The four-phase model of interest development. Educ Psychol 41(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hidi S, Baird W (1988) Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Read Res Q: 465–483

  3. Schiefele U (1991) Interest, learning, and motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3-4):299–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewey J (1913) Interest and effort in education. Houghton Mifflin

  5. Schiefele U, Krapp A, Winteler A (1992) Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research

  6. Liu NH, Chiang CY, Chu HC (2013) Recognizing the degree of human attention using eeg signals from mobile sensors. Sensors 13(8):10273–10286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuller B, Müeller R, Höernler B, Höethker A, Konosu H, Rigoll G (2007) Audiovisual recognition of spontaneous interest within conversations. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, pp 30–37

  8. White RW, Bailey P, Chen L (2009) Predicting user interests from contextual information. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, pp 363–370

  9. Qvarfordt P, Beymer D, Zhai S (2005) Realtourist–a study of augmenting human-human and human-computer dialogue with eye-gaze overlay. In: Human-computer interaction-INTERACT 2005. Springer, pp 767–780

  10. Hirayama T, Dodane JB, Kawashima H, Matsuyama T (2010) Estimates of user interest using timing structures between proactive content-display updates and eye movements. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 93(6):1470–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson RJ (2000) The neuroscience of affective style. The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2:1149–1159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao ZD, Yang Z, Zhang Z, Zhou T, Huang ZG, Lai YC (2013) Emergence of scaling in human-interest dynamics. Scientific reports. Nature: 3

  13. Hidi S (1990) Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Rev Educ Res 60(4):549–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson RC (1984) Interestingness of children’s reading material. Center for the study of reading technical report; no 323

  15. Vasicek O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J Financ Econ 5(2):177–188

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Heston SL (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud 6(2):327–343

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Uhlenbeck GE, Ornstein LS (1930) On the theory of the Brownian motion. Phys Rev 36(5):823

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapoor A, Picard RW, Ivanov Y (2004) Probabilistic combination of multiple modalities to detect interest. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on pattern recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004, vol 3. IEEE, pp 969–972

  19. Kapoor A, Picard RW (2005) Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on multimedia. ACM, pp 677–682

  20. Mota S, Picard RW (2003) Automated posture analysis for detecting learners interest level. In: Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshop, 2003. CVPRW03, vol 5. IEEE, pp 49–49

  21. Yeasin M, Bullot B, Sharma R (2006) Recognition of facial expressions and measurement of levels of interest from video. IEEE Trans Multimedia 8(3):500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuller B, Müller R, Eyben F, Gast J, Hörnler B, Wöllmer M et al (2009) Being bored? Recognising natural interest by extensive audiovisual integration for real-life application. Image Vis Comput 27 (12):1760–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Batliner A, Steidl S, Schuller B, Seppi D, Laskowski K, Vogt T, et al (2006) Combining efforts for improving automatic classification of emotional user states. Proc IS-LTC: 240–245

  24. Ashraf AB, Lucey S, Cohn JF, Chen T, Ambadar Z, Prkachin KM et al (2009) The painful face–pain expression recognition using active appearance models. Image Vis Comput 27(12):1788–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lam W, Mukhopadhyay S, Mostafa J, Palakal M (1996) Detection of shifts in user interests for personalized information filtering. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, pp 317-325

  26. Lam W, Mostafa J (2001) Modeling user interest shift using a bayesian approach. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 52(5):416–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma Z, Dai Q, Liu N (2015) Several novel evaluation measures for rank-based ensemble pruning with applications to time series prediction. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma Z, Dai Q (2016) Selected an stacking ELMs for time series prediction. Neural Process Lett: 1–26

  29. Kasabov NK, Song Q (2002) DENFIS: dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aue A, Norinho DD, Hörmann S (2015) On the prediction of stationary functional time series. J Am Stat Assoc 110(509):378–392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Widyantoro DH, Ioerger TR, Yen J (2001) Learning user interest dynamics with a three-descriptor representation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 52(3):212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zha Y, Zhou T, Zhou C (2015) Unfolding large-scale online collaborative human dynamics. arXiv:150705248

  33. Kwon O, Son WS, Jung WS (2016) The double power law in human collaboration behavior: the case of wikipedia. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 461:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao ZD, Gao YC, Cai SM, Zhou T (2016) Dynamic patterns of academic forum activities. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 461:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kan A, Chan J, Hayes C, Hogan B, Bailey J, Leckie C (2013) A time decoupling approach for studying forum dynamics. World Wide Web 16(5–6):595–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chan J, Hayes C, Daly EM (2010) Decomposing discussion forums and boards using user roles. ICWSM 10:215–218

    Google Scholar 

  37. Viégas FB, Smith M (2004) Newsgroup crowds and authorlines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2004. IEEE, p 10

  38. Xiong R, Donath J (1999) Peoplegarden: creating data portraits for users. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, pp 37–44

  39. Wu Y, Zhou C, Xiao J, Kurths J, Schellnhuber HJ (2010) Evidence for a bimodal distribution in human communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(44):18803–18808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou T, Kiet HAT, Kim BJ, Wang BH, Holme P (2008) Role of activity in human dynamics. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82(2):28002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Renninger K, Wozniak RH (1985) Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Dev Psychol 21(4):624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vespignani A (2009) Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science 325(5939):425–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang TC, Lee HD (2009) Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Syst Appl 36(5):8980–8985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang YM, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Fouque JP, Papanicolaou G, Sircar KR (2000) Mean-reverting stochastic volatility. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 3(01):101–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu Q, Miao C (2013) Curiosity: from psychology to computation. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 46(2):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) Tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gordon NJ, Salmond DJ, Smith AF (1993) Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation. In: IEE proceedings f-radar and signal processing, vol 140. IET, pp 107–113

  49. Hastie R, Dawes RM (2010) Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage

  50. Wang TC, Lee HD (2009) Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Syst Appl 36(5):8980–8985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fan Z (1996) Complicated multiple attribute decision making: theory and applications

  52. Chu A, Kalaba R, Spingarn K (1979) A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J Optim Theory Appl 27(4):531–538

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Siegel DJ (2015) The developing mind: how relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Publications

  54. Yamaguchi M, Proctor RW (2012) Multidimensional vector model of stimulus–response compatibility. Psychol Rev 119(2):272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Doob JL (1942) The Brownian movement and stochastic equations. Ann Math: 351–369

  56. Karaoguz C, Drix E, Potapova D, Huelse M (2011) Curiosity driven exploration of sensory-motor mappings Deliverable for the IM-CLeVer spring school at the Capo Caccia cognitive neuromorphic engineering workshop, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  57. Curtain RF, Falb PL (1970) Ito’s lemma in infinite dimensions. J Math Anal Appl 31(2):434–448

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Phillips PC (1972) The structural estimation of a stochastic differential equation system. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:1021–1041

  59. Phillips PC, Yu J (2009) Maximum likelihood and gaussian estimation of continuous time models in finance. In: Handbook of financial time series. Springer, pp 497–530

  60. Hull J, White A (1987) The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. J Financ 42(2):281–300

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Valdivieso L, Schoutens W, Tuerlinckx F (2009) Maximum likelihood estimation in processes of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type. Stat Infer Stoch Process 12(1):1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu Q, Miao C, Shen Z (2012) A curious learning companion in virtual learning environment. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2012. IEEE, pp 1-8

  63. Bosu A, Corley CS, Heaton D, Chatterji D, Carver JC, Kraft NA (2013) Building reputation in stackoverflow: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories. IEEE Press, pp 89–92

  64. Movshovitz-Attias D, Movshovitz-Attias Y, Steenkiste P, Faloutsos C (2013) Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow. In: IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks and mining (ASONAM), 2013. IEEE, pp 886–893

  65. Kaplan AD, OrSullivan JA, Sirevaag EJ, Lai PH, Rohrbaugh JW (2012) Hidden state models for noncontact measurements of the carotid pulse using a laser doppler vibrometer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59 (3):744–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hu X, Nenov V, Bergsneider M, Glenn TC, Vespa P, Martin N (2007) Estimation of hidden state variables of the intracranial system using constrained nonlinear Kalman filters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54 (4):597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fan W, Bifet A (2013) Mining big data: current status, and forecast to the future. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 14(2):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Laurila JK, Gatica-Perez D, Aad I, Bornet O, Do TMT, Dousse O et al (2012) The mobile data challenge: Big data for mobile computing research Pervasive computing. EPFL-CONF-19 2489

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hidi S (2000) Harackiewicz JM. Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Rev Educ Res 70(2):151–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hidi S, Baird W (1986) Interestingness—a neglected variable in discourse processing. Cogn Sci 10(2):179–194

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Alexander PA, Murphy PK (1998) Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. J Educ Psychol 90(3):435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Alexander PA, Jetton TL, Kulikowich JM (1995) Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: assessing a model of domain learning. J Educ Psychol 87(4):559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Cordova DI, Lepper MR (1996) Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J Educ Psychol 88(4):715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mitchell M (1993) Situational interest: its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. J Educ Psychol 85(3):424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Renninger K, Wozniak RH (1985) Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Dev Psychol 21(4):624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Krapp A, Lewalter D (2001) Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations: a longitudinal study in vocational school and work settings. Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications: 209–232

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the editors of this paper. Their suggestions helped improved the manuscript and gave us new insights into the ideas presented in the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India

    Tanveer Ahmed & Abhishek Srivastava

Authors
  1. Tanveer Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abhishek Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanveer Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, T., Srivastava, A. An automated approach to estimate human interest. Appl Intell 47, 1186–1207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0947-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0947-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation