Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in Sexual Behaviors in Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Comparison Between the Double-Blind and Open-Label Extension Phases of the ANRS-IPERGAY Trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is changing the landscape of HIV prevention, and may bring changes in sexual behaviors. The double-blind phase (DBP) and open-label extension (OLE) study of the ANRS-IPERGAY trial allowed us to assess changes in sexual behavior of men who have sex with men (MSM) taking sexual activity-based (i.e., on-demand) PrEP. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models found a significant decrease in the number of sexual partners (Coefficient [CI95%], p value; − 0.37[− 0.70 to − 0.04], p = 0.03) between the DBP and OLE as well as in the number of sexual relations (− 0.25 [− 0.49 to 0.00], 0.04). GEE estimates also showed that respondents’ most recent sexual relation was less likely to have been with an unknown casual partner during the OLE than during the DBP (Odds Ratio [CI95%], p value: 0.75[0.62–0.92], 0.005). Furthermore, they showed an increase in the proportion of condomless anal sex in the OLE (1.32[1.04–1.67], 0.02), a decrease in the proportion of ‘suboptimal PrEP adherence’ over time (0.75[0.58–0.97], p = 0.03), a decrease in PrEP only use (0.73[0.55–0.96], 0.03) and in both PrEP and condom use over time (0.70[0.51–0.95], 0.02) and finally, a decrease in alcohol consumption between the DBP and OLE (0.74[0.61–0.90], 0.002). We observed both protective and risky behaviors in terms of HIV and STI risk after on-demand PrEP uptake in the OLE phase. Our findings are consistent with results from previous PrEP trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. The Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Molina J-M, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eaton LA, Kalichman S. Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogben M, Liddon N. Disinhibition and risk compensation: scope, definitions, and perspective. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(12):1009–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collin J, David P-M, editors. Vers une pharmaceuticalisation de la société? le médicament comme objet social. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2016 (Problèmes sociaux et interventions sociales).

  7. Rojas Castro D, Delabre RM, Molina J. Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Golub SA, Gamarel KE, Surace A. Demographic differences in PrEP-related stereotypes: implications for implementation. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1229–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Molina J-M, Charreau I, Spire B, Cotte L, Chas J, Capitant C, et al. Efficacy, safety, and effect on sexual behaviour of on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in men who have sex with men: an observational cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(9):e402–e410410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Girard G. “La pilule qui change tout ?” analyse des débats québécois autour de la prophylaxie préexposition du VIH. In: Vers une pharmaceuticalisation de la société. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2016. p. 193–218.

  11. Kalampalikis N, Apostolidis T. La perspective socio-génétique des représentations sociales. In: Les représentations sociales. De Boeck. Bruxelles: De Boeck; 2016. p. 69–85. (Ouvertures Psychologiques).

  12. Jansen M, Tromp N, Baltussen R. PrEP: why we are waiting. Lancet HIV. 2016;3:e11–e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Otis J, Lévy JJ-, Bernier M, editors. La recherche communautaire VIH/sida: des savoirs engagés. Québec (Québec): Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2015 (Collection Santé et société).

  14. Glasgow RE, Eckstein ET, ElZarrad MK. Implementation science perspectives and opportunities for HIV/AIDS research: integrating science, practice, and policy. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:S26–S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morin M, Apostolidis T. Contexte social et santé. In: Traité de psychologie de la santé. Dunod. Paris: Gustave-Nicolas Fisher; 2002.

  16. Liu AY, Vittinghoff E, Chillag K, Mayer K, Thompson M, Grohskopf L, et al. Sexual risk behavior among HIV-Uninfected men who have sex with men participating in a tenofovir preexposure prophylaxis randomized trial in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;64(1):87–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sagaon-Teyssier L, Suzan-Monti M, Demoulin B, Capitant C, Lorente N, Préau M, et al. Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial. AIDS Care. 2016;28(sup 1):48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcus JL, Glidden DV, Mayer KH, Liu AY, Buchbinder SP, Amico KR, et al. No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral hiv preexposure prophylaxis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e81997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu AY, Cohen SE, Vittinghoff E, Anderson PL, Doblecki-Lewis S, Bacon O, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection integrated with municipal- and community-based sexual health services. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oldenburg CE, Nunn AS, Montgomery M, Almonte A, Mena L, Patel RR, et al. Behavioral changes following uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in a clinical setting. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1075–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, et al. No new HIV infections with increasing use of hiv preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting: figure 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amico KR, Mehrotra M, Avelino-Silva VI, McMahan V, Veloso VG, et al. Self-reported recent PrEP dosing and drug detection in an open label PrEP study. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1535–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42(1):121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spinelli MA, Buchbinder SP. Pre-exposure prophylaxis persistence is a critical issue in PrEP implementation. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz896.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rolle C-P, Onwubiko U, Jo J, Sheth AN, Kelley CF, Holland DP. PrEP implementation and persistence in a county health department setting in Atlanta. GA AIDS Behav. 2019;23(S3):296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D’Angelo AB, Lopez-Rios J, Flynn AWP, Holloway IW, Pantalone DW, Grov C. Insurance- and medical provider-related barriers and facilitators to staying on PrEP: results from a qualitative study. Transl Behav Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan E, Dyar C, Newcomb M, D’Aquila R, Mustanski B. PrEP use and sexually transmitted infections are not associated longitudinally in a cohort study of young men who have sex with men in Chicago. AIDS Behav. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02664-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Streeck H, Janssen K, Crowell TA, Jessen H, Cordes C, Scholten S, et al. Prospective, multicenter study to assess point prevalence, incidence and recurrence of sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men in Germany: BRAHMS study [Internet] 2019. https://programme.ias2019.org/Abstract/Abstract/1906. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

  31. Nguyen V-K, Greenwald ZR, Trottier H, Cadieux M, Goyette A, Beauchemin M, et al. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections before and after Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV: a cohort study. AIDS. 2017;32:523.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Koester K, Amico RK, Gilmore H, Liu A, McMahan V, Mayer K, et al. Risk, safety and sex among male PrEP users: time for a new understanding. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(12):1301–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Auerbach JD, Hoppe TA. Beyond “getting drugs into bodies”: social science perspectives on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:19983. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.4.19983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mabire X, Puppo C, Morel S, Mora M, Rojas Castro D, Chas J, et al. Pleasure and PrEP: pleasure-seeking plays a role in prevention and in sexual quality of life, and could Lead to PrEP initiation. Am J Men’s Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988319827396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. World Health Organization. Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men and transgender people recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. p. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Richens J, Imrie J, Copas A. Condoms and seat belts: the parallels and the lessons. The Lancet. 2000;355(9201):400–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Roux P, Fressard L, Suzan-Monti M, Chas J, Sagaon-Teyssier L, Capitant C, et al. Is on-demand HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis a suitable tool for men who have sex with men who practice chemsex? Results from a sub-study of the ANRS-IPERGAY trial: JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the study’s participants who dedicated their time to this research for the benefit of their community. We also thank the AIDES community advocacy group and their community peer counsellors who made the study possible, through their availability and continuous interaction with the participants and study staff at study sites and, most importantly, outside the hours of scheduled visits. Our thanks also to Jude Sweeney for the English revision and editing, and to Bakridine Mmadi Mrenda for his contribution to the statistical analyses. This work was sponsored by the ANRS (France Recherche Nord & Sud Sida-HIV Hépatites) and funded by the ANRS, the Canadian HIV Trials Network, the Fonds de dotation Pierre Bergé pour la Prévention – SIDACTION, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. MDC is the recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the ANRS.

The ANRS IPERGAY study group: J.-M. Molina (coordinator), C. Capitant, B. Spire, G. Pialoux, L. Cotte, I. Charreau, C. Tremblay, J.-M. Le Gall, E. Cua, A. Pasquet, F. Raffi, C. Pintado, C. Chidiac, J. Chas, P. Charbonneau, C. Delaugerre, M. Suzan-Monti, B. Loze, J. Fonsart, G. Peytavin, A. Cheret, J. Timsit, G. Girard, N. Lorente, M. Préau, J.F. Rooney, M.A. Wainberg, D. Thompson, W. Rozenbaum, V. Doré, L. Marchand, M.-C. Simon, N. Etien, J.-P. Aboulker, L. Meyer, and J.-F. Delfraissy.

Participating hospitals and investigators: Paris St-Louis: C. Pintado, B. Loze, C. Delaugerre, P. Charbonneau, C. Gatey, D. Ponscarme, P. Penot, L. Niedbalski, R. Veron, J. Delgado, E. Dalle, S. Parlier, I. Madelaine, J. Fonsart, M. Danet, N. Mahjoub, N. Mezreb, K. Moudachirou, S. Morel, G. Conort, F. Lorho, M. Meunier, W. Rozenbaum, J.M. Molina; Paris Tenon: J. Chas, C. Monfort, J. Foucoin, B. Boissavy, S. Cousseau, S. Huon, M. Danet, A. Djessima, V. Berrebi, A. Adda, S. le Nagat, L. Zarka, J. Berdougo, G. Pialoux; Lyon: C. Chidiac, N. Mzoughi, F. Clement, A. Decouty, C. Chapolard, M. Godinot, C. Adouard-groslafeige, J. Koffi, A. Pansu, A. Becker, S. Pailhes, F. Bonnet, F. Jeanblanc, C. Brochier, X. Teruin, S. Rouby, L. Gilly, L. Cotte; Montréal: C. Beauvais, P. Arlotto, C. Fortin, A. Talbot, A. Chamberland, A. McKenzie, M. Blanchette, R; Rousseau, K. Montheuth, D. Thompson, M. Morin, M. Wainberg, C. Tremblay; Nice: C. Etienne, F. Tolonin, S. Breaud, V. Péchenot, S. Bagge, T. Cepitelli, PM. Roger, E. Rosenthal, E. Cua; Tourcoing: A. Cheret, P. Cornavin, S. Vandamme, J. Lambec, N. Dumon, O. Leclanche, T. Huleux, R. Biekre, O. Robineau, H. Melliez, H. Bazus, A. Pasquet; Nantes: C. Bernaud, M. Besnier, B. Bonnet, N. Hall, M. Cavellec, H. Hue, L. Larmet, M. Colas, R. Choquet, F. Raffi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MDC implemented this work under the supervision of LST and BS. MDC, MM and LST led the analysis. The manuscript was written collaboratively between MDC, LST, MSM, CP and BS, with input from DRC, LM, MP and JMM. CT, CCh and CC provided ongoing support to design and perform data collection throughout the cohort study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Di Ciaccio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JMM reports receiving support as an adviser for Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, Bristol–Myers Squib (BMS), and ViiV Healthcare, as well as research grants from Gilead Sciences and Merck. BS reports receiving support as an adviser for Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, and BMS, as well as research grants from Gilead Sciences and Merck. CCh reports receiving support as an adviser for Gilead, Pfizer, Janssen, and Astellas. CT reports receiving support from Gilead Sciences and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the ANRS IPERGAY Study Group were listed in acknowledgements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Ciaccio, M., Sagaon-Teyssier, L., Mimi, M. et al. Changes in Sexual Behaviors in Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Comparison Between the Double-Blind and Open-Label Extension Phases of the ANRS-IPERGAY Trial. AIDS Behav 24, 3093–3106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02864-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02864-8

Keywords

Navigation