Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationships of regeneration in Great Plains commodity agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years regenerative agriculture has attracted growing attention as a means to improve soil health and farmer livelihoods while slowing climate change. With this attention has come increased policy support as well as the launch of private sector programs that promote regenerative agriculture as a form of carbon farming. In the United States many of these programs recruit primarily in regions where large-scale commodity production prevails, such as the Great Plains. There, a decades-old regenerative agriculture movement is growing rapidly, but not due to the incentives offered by companies’ carbon programs. On the contrary, farmers are adopting regenerative practices to cut their dependence on corporate agrochemical inputs and expertise, and to thereby achieve technology sovereignty. These practice changes often strain farmers’ existing social relationships while drawing them into new and previously neglected ones, including the more-than-human relations necessary for building soil health. These new relationships and the knowledge they generate may in turn lead farmers to think differently about their own autonomy. These findings provide insight into farmers’ skepticism of private sector carbon farming programs, and highlight the value of attention to the multiple types of relationship change that accompany and facilitate regenerative transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Food manufacturers running such programs (such as General Mills and PepsiCo) typically pay farmers for the practices they adopt and then count the sequestered carbon towards their corporate emission reduction targets (known as “insetting”). The agribusinesses and startups running carbon markets (such as Bayer, Indigo, and Corteva) pay for the carbon sequestered (and sometimes also for practices). In this paper we refer to all of them as “carbon programs.”

  2. The Indigenous origins of these principles received little attention at the movement events we attended. But a handful of the farmers we interviewed were active in RegeNErate Nebraska, a group that started from the premise that “Regeneration is a Native concept” (RegeNErate Nebraska, n.d.)

  3. In November 2023, the USDA revised its Good Farming Practices handbook to allow farmers using “USDA approved conservation practices” to remain eligible for insurance (German, 2023).

  4. The best known is the Haney test, which evaluates soil respiration and nutrient cycling (Haney et al. 2018). Some farmers also mentioned using the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) test, which measures soil microbial biomass (Sundermeier, 2019). A growing number of startups, such as Trace Genomics and Biome Makers, use DNA sequencing to identify microbial populations. But these tests are much more expensive; only one farmer mentioned using BiomeMakers’ “BeCrop” test.

References

  • Altieri, M. A., and V. M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(3): 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. R., C. Maughan, and M. P. Pimbert. 2019. Transformative agroecology learning in Europe: building consciousness, skills and collective capacity for food sovereignty. Agriculture and Human Values 36(3): 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argüelles, L., and H. March. 2023. A relational approach to pesticide use: Farmers, herbicides, nutsedge, and the weedy path to pesticide use reduction objectives. Journal of Rural Studies 101: 103046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwood, L., A. Pilny, J. Canfield, M. Jamila, and R. Thomson. 2022. From Big Ag to Big Finance: a market network approach to power in agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 39(4): 1421–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer. 2024, January 15. U.S. Carbon Program. https://www.bayer.com/en/agriculture/carbon-program-united-states.

  • Beacham, J. D., P. Jackson, C. C. Jaworski, A. Krzywoszynska, and L. V. Dicks. 2023. Contextualising farmer perspectives on regenerative agriculture: a post-productivist future? Journal of Rural Studies 102: 103100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, G. M., and C. C. Geisler. 2019. The social consequences and challenges of new agricultural technologies. Routledge.

  • Berlin, I. 1959. Two concepts of liberty. Clarendon.

  • Blake, H. 2023, October 16. The Great Cash-for-Carbon Hustle. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/10/23/the-great-cash-for-carbon-hustle.

  • Blesh, J., and S. A. Wolf. 2014. Transitions to agroecological farming systems in the Mississippi River Basin: toward an integrated socioecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 31(4): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, A., F. Davila, and R. Plant. 2023. A genealogy of sustainable agriculture narratives: implications for the transformative potential of regenerative agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10444-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. Avoiding the local trap: Scale and Food systems in Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(2): 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 2018. Dirt to soil: one family’s journey into regenerative agriculture. Chelsea Green Publishing.

  • Buck, H. J., and A. Palumbo-Compton. 2022. Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think? Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2.

  • Burton, R. J. F., J. Forney, P. Stock, and L.-A. Sutherland. 2020. The good farmer: culture and identity in food and agriculture. Routledge.

  • Cabral, L., and J. Sumberg. 2022. The use of epic narratives in promoting natural agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture 51(1): 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadloff, E. B. 2021, July 26. Agri-Business Corporations Are Trying to Save The Environment, Or Are They? Modern Farmer. https://modernfarmer.com/2021/07/what-is-greenwashing/.

  • Calvário, R. 2017. Food sovereignty and new peasantries: on re-peasantization and counter-hegemonic contestations in the Basque territory. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44(2): 402–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill. (n.d.). Cargill Regenconnect. Retrieved January 15. 2024. from https://regenconnect.cargill.com/.

  • Carlisle, L. 2022. Healing grounds: climate, justice, and the deep roots of regenerative farming. Island.

  • Carlos, A. M., D. L. Feir, and A. Redish. 2022. Indigenous nations and the development of the U.S. economy: land, resources, and dispossession. The Journal of Economic History 82(2): 516–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. 2018. Smart farming techniques as political ontology: Access, sovereignty and the performance of neoliberal and not-so‐neoliberal worlds. Sociologia Ruralis 58(4): 745–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, C. 2023, April 21. Why General Mills is embarking on a farmer-driven regenerative agriculture strategy. Food Dive. https://www.fooddive.com/news/general-mills-regenerative-agriculture-sustainability-earth-day-farming-farmers-strategy-approach/648304/.

  • Casey, C., and S. Lucas. 2023, April 27. Regenerative ag is driving food sustainability promises, but is it greenwashing? Food Dive. https://www.fooddive.com/news/regenerative-ag-is-driving-food-sustainability-promises-but-is-it-greenwas/648583/.

  • Castellanos-Navarrete, A., and K. Jansen. 2018. Is oil palm expansion a challenge to agroecology? Smallholders practising industrial farming in Mexico. Journal of Agrarian Change 18(1): 132–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, C. 2023, February 2. High input costs might turn more farmers to regenerative practices. Investigate Midwest. https://investigatemidwest.org/2023/02/02/high-input-costs-might-turn-more-farmers-to-regenerative-practices/.

  • Cofré-Bravo, G., L. Klerkx, and A. Engler. 2019. Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: how farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies 69: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comi, M. 2019. The right hybrid for every acre: assembling the social worlds of corn and soy seed-selling in conventional agricultural techniques. Sociologia Ruralis 59(1): 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comi, M. 2023. Farmers who tinker: grounded alternatives to incrementalism and the growth imperative. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comito, J., J. Wolseth, and L. Morton. 2013. Stewards, businessmen, and heroes? Role conflict and contradiction among row-crop farmers in an age of environmental uncertainty. Human Organization 72(4): 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. 2022, July 9. Companies’ Climate Promises Face a Wild Card: Farmers. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/09/business/farmers-climate-change.html.

  • Creswell, J. 2023, September 22. For many Big Food companies, emissions head in the wrong direction. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/22/business/food-companies-emissions-climate-pledges.html.

  • Cunfer, G., and B. Waiser. 2016. Bison and people on the North American Great Plains: a deep environmental history. Texas A&M University.

  • Cusworth, G., J. Lorimer, and A. Welden. 2023. Farming for the patchy anthropocene: the spatial imaginaries of regenerative agriculture. The Geographical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., S. D’Amico, and E. Fouilleux. 2019. A relational perspective on the dynamics of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France. Journal of Rural Studies 68: 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Bellacasa, M. P. 2015. Making time for soil: technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 691–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., and G. R. Soares. 2020. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1–12.

  • Downs, G. 2023, August 9. Biden sold farmers on climate change. Now his sights are set on Wall Street. Politico. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-nightly/2023/08/09/biden-sold-farmers-on-climate-change-now-his-sights-are-set-on-wall-street-00110548.

  • Dudley, K. M. 2002. Debt and dispossession: farm loss in America’s heartland. University of Chicago Press.

  • Duncan, J., M. Carolan, and J. S. C. Wiskerke. eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of sustainable and regenerative food systems. Routledge.

  • Emery, S. B. 2015. Independence and individualism: conflated values in farmer cooperation? Agriculture and Human Values 32(1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett-Atkinson, M. 2021, June 18. Food giants are turning to regenerative farming. Is it just fancy greenwashing? National Observer. https://www.nationalobserver.com/2021/06/18/news/food-giants-regenerative-farming-eco-friendly-fancy-greenwashing.

  • Fox, A. 2023, March 1. Report: Big Ag plans to use carbon markets, farmer data to tighten stranglehold on food system. Friends of the Earth. https://foe.org/news/report-carbon-markets/.

  • Friedmann, H. 1978. World market, state, and family farm: social bases of household production in the era of wage labor. Comparative Studies in Society and History 20(4): 545–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: the rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29(2): 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulwider, W., D. Mayerfeld, and K. Shelley. 2022. Agricultural carbon credits: A deeper dive into key concepts for farmers and landowners. University of Wisconsin Extension: Crops and Soils. https://cropsandsoils.extension.wisc.edu/articles/agricultural-carbon-credits-a-deeper-dive-into-key-concepts-for-farmers-and-landowners/#:~:text=Additionality%20is%20the%20idea%20that,that%20would%20otherwise%20be%20released.

  • Gahman, L. 2020. Land, God, and guns: Settler colonialism and masculinity in the American heartland. Zed.

  • Gates, P. W. 1942. The role of the land speculator in western development. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 66(3): 314–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, B. 2023, December 6. Good farming practices updated by USDA. AgNetWest. https://agnetwest.com/good-farming-practices-updated-by-usda/.

  • Giller, K. E., R. Hijbeek, J. A. Andersson, and J. Sumberg. 2021. Regenerative agriculture: an agronomic perspective. Outlook on Agriculture 50(1): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E., F. Davila, and C. Riedy. 2022. Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 39(2): 809–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H. 2021. Regenerating soil, regenerating soul: an integral approach to understanding agricultural transformation. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00993-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., N. Gill, and M. Voyer. 2019. Transformational adaptation on the farm: processes of change and persistence in transitions to climate-smart regenerative agriculture. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 59: 101965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., K. Grimm, and B. E. Goldstein. 2020. A half century of holistic management: what does the evidence reveal? Agriculture and Human Values 37(3): 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, T. 2018, February 13. No-Till Farmers’ Push for Healthy Soils Ignites a Movement in the Plains. https://civileats.com/2018/02/13/no-till-farmers-push-for-healthy-soils-ignites-a-movement-in-the-plains/.

  • Han, G., and M. T. Niles. 2023. Interested but uncertain: carbon markets and data sharing among U.S. crop farmers. Land, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081526.

  • Haney, R. L., E. B. Haney, D. R. Smith, R. D. Harmel, and M. J. White. 2018. The soil health tool—theory and initial broad-scale application. Applied Soil Ecology: A Section of Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 125: 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N., and J. R. Jr.Kloppenburg. 1995. Where the grass grows again: knowledge exchange in the sustainable agriculture movement. Rural Sociology 60(4): 721–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbers, D. 2023. (October 6). Three Nebraska tribes buying back farmland attempting to reverse history. Nebraska Public Radio. https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/en/news/news-articles/three-nebraska-tribes-buying-back-farmland-attempting-to-reverse-history/#:~:text=In%20the%20past%20five%20years,farmland%20that%20was%20once%20theirs.

  • Higgins, V., D. van der Velden, N. Bechtet, M. Bryant, J. Battersby, M. Belle, and L. Klerkx. 2023. Deliberative assembling: tinkering and farmer agency in precision agriculture implementation. Journal of Rural Studies 100: 103023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffschneider, K. 2023, March 13. Circle of friends for soil health. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/circle-friends-soil-health-kerry-hoffschneider/.

  • Horst, M., and A. Marion. 2019. Racial, ethnic and gender inequities in farmland ownership and farming in the U.S. Agriculture and Human Values 36(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, E. 2023. The soil sponge workshop. Dr. Elaine’s Soil Food Web School. https://www.soilfoodweb.com/soil-sponge-regeneration-workshop/.

  • James, H. S., M. K. Hendrickson, and P. H. Howard. 2013. Networks, power and dependency in the agrifood Industry. In The Ethics and Economics of Agrifood Competition, ed. Jr. James,H. S. 99–126. Springer Netherlands.

  • Jansen, K., M. Vicol, and L. Nikol. 2022. Autonomy and repeasantization: conceptual, analytical, and methodological problems. Journal of Agrarian Change 22(3): 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, G., and W. LaFleur. 2023. Ways of (un)knowing landscapes: tracing more-than-human relations in regenerative agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 101: 103059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroma, M. M. 2006. Organic Farmer networks: facilitating learning and innovation for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28(4): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A. 2019. Caring for soil life in the Anthropocene: the role of attentiveness in more-than‐human ethics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44(4): 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A. 2020. Nonhuman labor and the making of resources: making soils a resource through microbial labor. Environmental Humanities 12(1): 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A., and G. Marchesi. 2020. Toward a relational materiality of soils. Environmental Humanities 12(1): 190–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A., S. Banwart, and D. Blacker. 2020. To know, to dwell, to care: Towards an actionable, place-based knowledge of soils. Thinking with soil. Material politics and social theory, ed. Juan F. Salazar et al, 89–106. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350109568.ch-006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laforge, J. M. L., and S. M. McLachlan. 2018a. Environmentality on the Canadian prairies: settler-farmer subjectivities and agri-environmental objects. Antipode 50(2): 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforge, J. M. L., and S. M. McLachlan. 2018b. Learning communities and new farmer knowledge in Canada. Geoforum; Journal of Physical Human and Regional Geosciences 96: 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, N. 2023, September 19. Revealed: Top carbon offset projects may not cut planet-heating emissions. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/19/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases.

  • Lavoie, A., and C. B. Wardropper. 2021. Engagement with conservation tillage shaped by good farmer identity. Agriculture and Human Values 38(4): 975–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessiter, M., and F. Lessiter. 2022, January 20. Timeline of the no till revolution. No Till Farmer. https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/articles/11095-timeline-of-the-no-till-revolution

  • Levins, R. A., and W. W. Cochrane. 1996. The treadmill revisited. Land Economics 72(4): 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lore, K. L. 2023, December 28. Want to Avoid Leaving Climate-Smart Money On the Table? There’s An App for That. AgWeb. https://www.agweb.com/news/business/conservation/want-avoid-leaving-climate-smart-money-table-theres-app.

  • Lotz, L. A. P., C. C. M. van de Wiel, and M. J. M. Smulders. 2020. Genetic engineering at the heart of agroecology. Outlook on Agriculture 49(1): 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., L. W. Morton, and A. D. Cast. 2013. Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values 30(1): 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Klugesherz, J. A., and M. R. Sanderson. 2023. Good for the soil, but good for the farmer? Addiction and recovery in transitions to regenerative agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 103: 103123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintert, J., and M. Langemeier. 2023. Ag Economy Barometer Index: improvement in farmer sentiment carries over into 2023, Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture. https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2023/Q1/improvement-in-farmer-sentiment-carries-over-into-2023.html.

  • Mol, A., I. Moser, and J. Pols. 2010. Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Columbia University.

  • Montenegro de Wit, M. 2022. Can agroecology and CRISPR mix? The politics of complementarity and moving toward technology sovereignty. Agriculture and Human Values 39(2): 733–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, G. 2023, September 20. How crop insurance prevents some farmers from adapting to climate change. Civil Eats. https://civileats.com/2023/09/20/how-crop-insurance-prevents-some-farmers-from-adapting-to-climate-change/.

  • Nelson, J., and P. Stock. 2018. Repeasantisation in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 58(1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P., N. Civita, L. Frankel-Goldwater, K. Bartel, and C. Johns. 2020. What is regenerative agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723.

  • Noy, C. 2008. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11(4): 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palen, B. 2022, December 14. Smoke & mirrors, not worth the extra cost: 50 US farmers speak out on carbon markets. Agfunder News. https://agfundernews.com/smoke-mirrors-not-worth-the-extra-cost-50-us-farmers-speak-out-on-carbon-markets

  • Pearse, A. 2015 (1980). Seeds of plenty, seeds of want: social and economic implications of the Green Revolution (Chap. 9). In P. Utting (Ed.), Volume III: Revisiting Sustainable Development (Vol. 139, pp. 139–157). United Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

  • PepsiCo & Walmart. 2023, July 26. PepsiCo and Walmart aim to support regenerative agriculture across more than 2 million acres of farmland. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pepsico-and-walmart-aim-to-support-regenerative-agriculture-across-more-than-2-million-acres-of-farmland-301886051.html.

  • Pham, X., and M. Stack. 2018. How data analytics is transforming agriculture. Business Horizons 61(1): 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipov, M., and M. K. Goodman. 2017. The celebrification of farmers: celebrity and the new politics of farming. Celebrity Studies 8(2): 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastina, A. 2022. The US Voluntary Agricultural Carbon Market: Where to From Here? Farm Foundation. https://www.farmfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Farm-Foundation-Issue-Report-on-Agricultural-Carbon-Market.pdf.

  • Popkin, G. 2023. Shaky ground. Science 381(6656): 369–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, E. A. 2010. Seeds of change: hybrid corn, monopoly, and the hunt for superprofits. The Review of Radical Political Economics 42(3): 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, P., C. B. Wardropper, F. R. Eanes, S. M. W. Reddy, S. C. Harden, Y. J. Masuda, and L. S. Prokopy. 2019. Understanding barriers and opportunities for adoption of conservation practices on rented farmland in the US. Land Use Policy 80: 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RegeNErate Nebraska. (n.d.). RegeNEration Proclamation: Growing Nebraska’s Communities from the Ground Up. Retrieved January 13. 2024. from http://www.regeneratenebraska.com/.

  • Riley, M., and B. Robertson. 2022. The virtual good farmer: Farmers’ use of social media and the (re)presentation of good farming. Sociologia Ruralis 62(3): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodale, R. 1983. Breaking new ground: the search for a sustainable agriculture. The Futurist 17(1): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch-McNally, G., J. G. Arbuckle, and J. C. Tyndall. 2018. Soil as social-ecological feedback: examining the ethic of soil stewardship among Corn Belt farmers. Rural Sociology 83(1): 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S. T., M. S. Carolan, and M. E. Schipanski. 2020. A dryland cropping revolution? Linking an emerging soil health paradigm with shifting social fields among wheat growers of the High Plains. Rural Sociology 85(2): 545–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P., and M. E. Martinez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05000-170317.

  • Rust, N. A., P. Stankovics, R. M. Jarvis, Z. Morris-Trainor, J. R. de Vries, J. Ingram, J. Mills, J. A. Glikman, J. Parkinson, Z. Toth, R. Hansda, R. McMorran, J. Glass, and M. S. Reed. 2022. Have farmers had enough of experts? Environmental Management 69(1): 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. R., and V. Hughes. 2018. Race to the bottom (of the well): groundwater in an agricultural production treadmill. Social Problems 66(3): 392–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sands, B., M. R. Machado, A. White, E. Zent, and R. Gould. 2023. Moving towards an anti-colonial definition for regenerative agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10429-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, F. P. 2016. Complex shades of green: gradually changing notions of the good farmer in a Swedish context. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3): 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The environment: from surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press.

  • Seymour, M., and S. Connelly. 2023. Regenerative agriculture and a more-than-human ethic of care: a relational approach to understanding transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 40(1): 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. 1991. The violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics. Zed Books.

  • Skaalsveen, K., J. Ingram, and J. Urquhart. 2020. The role of farmers’ social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practices. Agricultural Systems 181: 102824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P., and N. Hopwood. 2009. A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(1): 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, J. 1982, May 11. Erosion-wary farmers are spurning the traditional plow. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/11/science/erosion-wary-farmers-are-spurning-the-traditional-plow.html.

  • Stock, P. V., and J. Forney. 2014. Farmer autonomy and the farming self. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P. V., J. Forney, S. B. Emery, and H. Wittman. 2014. Neoliberal natures on the farm: Farmer autonomy and cooperation in comparative perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strube, J. 2022. Pockets of peasantness: small-scale agricultural producers in the Central Finger Lakes Region of Upstate New York. In Rethinking Food System Transformation, eds. R. Bezner, T. L. Kerr, B. J. Pendergrast, I. I. Smith, and J. Liebert. 187–198. Springer Nature Switzerland.

  • Sundermeier, A. 2019, April 16. The PLFA Soil Health Test. No Till Farmer. https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/articles/8692-the-plfa-soil-health-test.

  • Sutherland, L.-A., and R. J. F. Burton. 2011. Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis 51(3): 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tironi, M., M. Kearnes, A. Krzywoszynska, C. Granjou, and J. F. Salazar. 2020. Soil theories: relational, decolonial, inhuman. In Thinking with soils, Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Tittonell, P., V. El Mujtar, G. Felix, Y. Kebede, L. Laborda, R. Luján Soto, and J. de Vente. 2022. Regenerative agriculture—agroecology without politics? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.844261.

  • Triplett, G. B. Jr, and W. A. Dick. 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agronomy Journal, 100(S3), S– 153– S– 165.

  • Urban, C., and A. S. Cole. 2022. READY OR NOT? Ag Carbon Markets and U.S. Farmers. Trust in Food. https://www.trustinfood.com/insights-reports/ag-carbon-markets-and-u-s-farmers/.

  • USDA. 2023a. A General Assessment of the role of Agriculture and Forestry in U.S. Carbon markets. United States Department of Agriculture.

  • USDA. 2023b. USDA Kicks-off Effort to Expand Market Opportunities for Climate-Smart Commodities and Learn from Pilot Projects. https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2023/04/27/usda-kicks-effort-expand-market-opportunities-climate-smart.

  • van der Ploeg, J. D. 2009. The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Routledge.

  • Wade, N. 1974. Green Revolution: a just technology, often unjust in use. Science 186(4169): 1093–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, M., C. Berndt, and B. Mansfield. 2021. The glyphosate assemblage: herbicides, uneven development, and chemical geographies of ubiquity. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(1): 19–35.

  • Wezel, A., S. Bellon, T. Doré, C. Francis, D. Vallod, and C. David. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29(4): 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. 2004. Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s. OUP USA.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Matthew Sanderson and three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments, and the many farmers we interviewed for the time, experiences and knowledge they generously shared with us. All mistakes are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Julie Snorek and Susanne Freidberg are both first authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Freidberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snorek, J., Freidberg, S. & Smith, G. Relationships of regeneration in Great Plains commodity agriculture. Agric Hum Values (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10558-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10558-3

Keywords

Navigation