Abstract
This paper uses distinctions between differing senses of “private,” “public” and “political” in the United States to argue for the value of framing food issues as a collective problem that calls for broadscale demands for justice. We argue that food choices do not simply belong to the realm of private preferences and market transactions. Rather, they are a set of decisions that have systemic causes and public consequences. They are shaped and constrained by public policies that underwrite the transportation of food over long distances as well as particular crops and foodstuffs, and by the vendors and advertisers who try to convince us to eat more of the foods they produce. Because the consequences of eating an abundance of empty calories are not easily remedied at the personal level, citizens need to demand public, systemic solutions, including better food information, youth food education, and a healthier food supply.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Slow Food Manifesto:https://slowfood.com/filemanager/Convivium%20Leader%20Area/Manifesto_Quality_ENG.pdf
For a similar study of how whiteness pervades farmers’ markets see Alkon and McCullen 2011. Similarly, Anguelovski (2015) describes how a dominant white institution, Whole Foods, took over a Latino supermarket in Jamaica Plain, Boston.
The notion that consuming prepared foods with lots of empty calories puts people’s health at risk is not universally accepted. We acknowledge Guthman’s arguments that call into question the slide from correlation into causation and suggest that being overweight or obese is not definitively connected to being at greater risk of ill health (Guthman 2011a).
The material here is drawn from an on-going dissertation project that compares food literacy initiatives in the US and Italy.
The Denver Food Vision document was published in 2017 and is available at the following link: https://www.denvergov.org/content/dam/denvergov/Portals/771/documents/CH/Final_FoodVision_120717.pdf.
HFDK has developed a map application identifying priority neighborhoods currently served, available at the following link: https://cohealthinst.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=37184a4d300142fda9f65c7205c62b74&extent=-11728734.2175%2C4799588.8794%2C-11612549.9345%2C4863490.2351%2C102100).
The HFDK Commission’s working definition of at-risk is defined as: “Individuals who demonstrate status including but not limited to: racial/ethnic minority, low socioeconomic status, low income, refugee/immigrant, transgender or gender non-confirming, LGBTQ + , differently abled, experiencing homelessness.” Additionally, an At-Risk Rank index is used later in the report (see page 9); when referring to this specific index, capital letters will be used (e.g. At-Risk Rank).
HFDK grantees include non-profits, public schools, and city agencies.
Neighborhoods not identified as priority may still be included in HFDK funding activities, if they include residents who are considered socially disadvantaged or underserved.
References
Agarwal, B. 2014. Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: critical contradictions, difficult conciliations. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1247–1268.
Agyeman, J., D. Schlosberg, L. Craven, and C. Matthews. 2016. Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41 (1): 321–340.
Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. Introduction: The food movement as polyculture. In Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability, ed. Alison Hope Alkon and Julian Agyeman. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Alkon, A.H., and J. Guthman. 2017. The New Food Activism: Opposition, Cooperation, and Collective Action. Oakland: University of California Press.
Alkon, A.H., and K.M. Norgaard. 2009. Breaking the food chains: An investigation of food justice activism. Sociological Inquiry 79 (3): 289–305.
Anguelovski, I. 2015. Alternative food provision conflicts in cities: Contesting food privilege, injustice, and whiteness in Jamaica Plain, Boston. Geoforum 58: 184–194.
Bagdonis, J.M., C.C. Hinrichs, and K.A. Schafft. 2009. The Emergence and framing of farm-to-school initiatives: Civic engagement, health and local agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. 26 (1–2): 107–119.
Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.
Boero, N. 2013. Obesity in the media: Social science weighs in. Critical Public Health 23 (3): 371–380.
Boling, P. 1991. The democratic potential of mothering. Political Theory 19 (4): 606–625.
Boling, P. 1996. Privacy and the Politics of Intimate Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bornemann, B., and S. Weiland. 2019. Empowering people—democratising the food system? exploring the democratic potential of food-related empowerment forms. Politics and Governance 7 (4): 105–118.
Brownell, K., and K.B. Horgen. 2004. Food Fight: The Inside Story of the Food Industry, America’s Obesity Crisis, and What We Can Do About It. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Brownell, K.D., and K.E. Warner. 2009. The perils of ignoring history: big tobacco played dirty and millions died: how similar is big food? The Milbank Quarterly 87 (1): 259–294.
Cadieux, K.V., and R. Slocum. 2015. What does it mean to do food justice? Journal of Political Ecology 22: 1.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 2010. 558 U.S. 310
Clendenning, J., W.H. Dressler, and C. Richards. 2016. Food justice or food sovereignty? understanding the rise of urban food movements in the USA. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (1): 165–177.
Cooksey-Stowers, K., M. Schwartz, and K. Brownell. 2017. Food swamps predict obesity rates better than food deserts in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (11): 1366.
Shelby County v. Holder. 2013. 570 U.S. 529
DuPuis, E. M., J. L. Harrison, and D. Goodman, Just Food? 2011. Chapter 13 of Alkon, A. H., & Agyeman, J. (Eds). Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability. Cambridge, MIT Press
DuPuis, E.M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go ‘“home”’ to eat?: Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21 (3): 359–371.
Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.
Gottlieb, R., and A. Joshi. 2010. Food justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Greene, M., B. Houghtaling, C. Sadeghzadeh, M. De Marco, D. Bryant, R. Morgan and D. Holston. 2022. African Americans' perceptions of nutrition interventions: a scoping review. Nutrition Research Reviews. May 2022.
Guthman, J. 2011a. Weighing In: Obesity, Food Justice, and the Limits of Capitalism. Berkeley: UC Press.
Guthman, J. 2011b. ’If they only knew’: The Unbearable Whiteness of Alternative Food. In: Alkon, A. H., & Agyeman, J. (Eds). (2011b). Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hassanein, N. 2003. Practicing food democracy: A pragmatic politics of transformation. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 77–86.
Hassanein, N. 2008. Locating Food Democracy: Theoretical and Practical Ingredients. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 3 (2–3): 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320240802244215.
HFDK. 2018. General Ballot Language: Healthy Food For Denver’s Kids Initiated Ordinance 302. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.denvergov.org/files/assets/public/public-health-and-environment/documents/cbh/2018general_ballot_language.pdf
HFDK. 2020a. Healthy Food for Denver’s Kids Baseline Assessment. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.denvergov.org/files/assets/public/public-health-and-environment/documents/cbh/hfdk_baseline_2020a-final.pdf
HFDK. 2020b. Healthy Food for Denver’s Kids Theory of Change. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.denvergov.org/Government/Agencies-Departments-Offices/Agencies-Departments-Offices-Directory/Public-Health-Environment/Community-Behavioral-Health/Food-System-Policies/Healthy-Food-for-Denvers-Kids/Healthy-Food-Denvers-Kids-Impact-Reports
HFDK. 2022. Healthy Food for Denver’s Kids Year Two Final Report. Retrieved July 25, 2023 from https://www.denvergov.org/files/assets/public/public-health-and-environment/documents/cbh/healthy-food-for-denvers-kids/2022-reports/hfdk-report_year2-final-508_1.pdf
Holt-Giménez, E., R. Patel, and A. Shattuck. 2009. Food rebellions! Crisis and the hunger for justice. Oakland: Food First Books.
Horst, M. 2017. Food justice and municipal government in the USA. Planning Theory & Practice 18 (1): 51–70.
Lawrence, R. 2004. Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics 9 (3): 56–75.
Lusk, J. 2013. The Food Police: A well-fed manifesto about the politics of your plate. New York: Crown Forum.
McGlynn, J., and M.S. McGlone. 2018. Desire or Disease? Framing obesity to influence attributions of responsibility and policy support. Health Communication 34 (7): 689–701.
Mitchell, R.B., and C. Carpenter. 2019. Norms for the Earth: Changing the climate on ‘climate change.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (4): 413–429.
Moss, M. 2014. Salt Sugar Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us. NY: Random House.
Nguyen, H. 2018. Sustainable Food Systems: Concept and Framework. FAO: 1–8. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf.
Patchett, A.D., H.R. Yeatman, and K.M. Johnson. 2016. Obesity framing for health policy development in Australia. France and Switzerland. Health Promotion International 31 (1): 83–92.
Pitkin, H. 1981. Justice: On relating public and private. Political Theory 9 (3): 327–352.
Powell, L.J., and H. Wittman. 2018. Farm to School in British Columbia: Mobilizing Food Literacy for Food Sovereignty. Agriculture and Human Values 35 (1): 193–206.
Powell, L.M., J.L. Harris, and T. Fox. 2013. Food marketing expenditures aimed at youth: Putting the numbers in context. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 45 (4): 453–461.
Raymond, L., S.L. Weldon, D. Kelly, X.B. Arriaga, and A.M. Clark. 2014. Making change: Norm-based strategies for institutional change to address intractable problems. Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 197–211.
Richard, L., L. Gauvin, and K. Raine. 2011. Ecological models revisited: Their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annual Review of Public Health 32: 307–326.
Saguy, A.C., K. Gruys, and S. Gong. 2010. Social problem construction and national context: News reporting on “Overweight” and “Obesity” in the United States and France. Social Problems 57 (4): 586–610.
Sallis, J.F., and K. Glanz. 2009. Physical activity and food environments: Solutions to the obesity epidemic. The Milbank Quarterly 87 (1): 123–154.
Schanbacher, W.D. 2010. The Politics of Food: The Global Conflict Between Food Security and Food Sovereignty. ABC-CLIO.
Smaal, S.A. L., J. Dessein, B. J. Wind, and E. Rogge. 2020. Social Justice-Oriented Narratives in European Urban Food Strategies: Bringing Forward Redistribution, Recognition and Representation. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10179-6 (Accessed July 27, 2021).
Stone, D. 1989. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300.
Stone, D.A. 1997. Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. New York: WW Norton.
Story, M., K.M. Kaphingst, R. Robinson-O’Brien, and K. Glanz. 2008. Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health 29: 253–272.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. 2006. Policy Brief: Food Security. Available at: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/faoitaly/documents/pdf/pdf_Food_Security_Cocept_Note.pdf (Accessed July 25, 2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Boling, P., Cervini, C. Food justice: turning private choices into public issues. Agric Hum Values (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10503-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10503-w