Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When justifications are mistaken for motivations: COVID-related dietary changes at the food-health decision-making nexus

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws from data collected from 500+ surveys, distributed twice from the same respondents (2020 and 2021), and forty-five face-to-face interviews (2022). The location studied is a metropolitan county in Colorado (USA). The research examined the discourses and practices having to do with organic and natural food consumption—note, too, the data were collected at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings upend conventional understandings of, and frameworks used to explain, consumer behavior. What are often presented as motivations in prior studies are shown, instead, to be justifications; rationalizations after-the-fact. The paper troubles decision-making frameworks that cast motivations, attitudes, and intentions as “antecedents” to consumer behavior. Rather, the findings point to the significance of social networks, and in particular network diversity, for understanding and explaining the sayings (discourses) and doings (practices) of “individual” consumers. Discourses linked to health are also shown to be salient variables, though when situated within social networks those discourses are shown to have politics. Particular attention is devoted to explaining dietary shifts among those who reported the largest increases in the consumption of organic and natural foods between 2020 and 2021/22. The paper concludes discussing what the data mean from the standpoint of envisioning just and inclusive food system futures and agrifood policy that delivers on those ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TPB:

Theory of planned behavior

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

References

  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics nd. Food as Medicine. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Chicago, IL, https://www.eatrightfoundation.org/resources/food-as-medicine.

  • Adelman, J., and L. Haushofer. 2018. Introduction: food as Medicine, Medicine as Food. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 73 (2): 127–134. Ad Fontes nd. Interactive Media Bias Chart, https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman, N. 2023. The impact of the Ukraine war on food supplies: ‘It could have been so much worse’. NPR Feb 27, https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/27/1159630215/the-russia-ukraine-wars-impact-on-food-security-1-year-later.

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Swidi, A., S. Mohammed Rafiul Huque, M. Haroon Hafeez, and M. Noor Mohd Shariff. 2014. The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. British Food Journal 116 (10): 1561–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annunziata, A., M. Agovino, and A. Mariani. 2019. Sustainability of italian families’ food practices: Mediterranean diet adherence combined with organic and local food consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production 206: 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettig, R., and J. Hall. 2012. Big media, big money: Cultural texts and political economics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomey, N. 2022. Price gap between organic and conventional food is shrinking. Axios May 4, https://www.axios.com/2022/03/04/price-gap-organic-conventional-food-shrinking.

  • Borman, G. D., W. S. de Boef, F. Dirks, Y. S. Gonzalez, A. Subedi, M. H. Thijssen, J. Jacobs, T. Schrader, S. Boyd, J. Hermine, and E. van der Maden. 2022. Putting food systems thinking into practice: integrating agricultural sectors into a multi-level analytical framework. Global Food Security, 32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100591.

  • Bosnjak, M., I. Ajzen, and P. Schmidt. 2020. The theory of planned behavior: selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.v16i3.3107.

  • Boutyline, A., and R. Willer. 2017. The social structure of political echo chambers: variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political psychology 38 (3): 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges Watson, D. L., A. Draper, and W. Wills. 2021. The chimera of choice in UK food policy 1976–2018. British Food Journal 123 (4): 1596–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. 2021. Practicing social change during COVID-19: ethical food consumption and activism pre-and post-outbreak. Appetite 163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105206.

  • Carolan, M. 2022. COVID-19’s impact on Gendered Household Food Practices: eating and feeding as expressions of competencies, moralities, and mobilities. The Sociological Quarterly 63 (3): 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2020.1870415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, A., M. Berry, and A. Fixsen. 2020. What are the key features of orthorexia nervosa and influences on its development? A qualitative investigation. Appetite 155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104798.

  • Clapp, J., and G. Scrinis. 2017. Big food, nutritionism, and corporate power. Globalizations 14 (4): 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comi, M. 2020. The distributed farmer: rethinking US midwestern precision agriculture techniques. Environmental Sociology 6 (4): 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E. 2022. Growth of organic, natural products slows in face of recession—can functional ingredients reinvigorate this space? Food Navigator October 4, https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2022/10/03/Growth-of-natural-organic-products-slows-but-bright-spots-include-functional-ingredients#.

  • Dangi, N., S. K. Gupta, and S. A. Narula. 2020. Consumer buying behaviour and purchase intention of organic food: a conceptual framework. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 31 (6): 1515–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., K. Kasala, and S. Kumar. 2023. Gender inclusive food systems for sustainable healthy diets in low and middle-income countries. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 47 (7): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2215192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1954 (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Swallow Press.

  • Foucault, M. 2003. Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège of France, 1975–76, trans. David Macey, New York: Picador.

  • Franck, C., S. Grandi, and M. Eisenberg. 2013. Agricultural subsidies and the american obesity epidemic. American journal of preventive medicine 45 (3): 327–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridman, A., R. Gershon, and A. Gneezy. 2021. COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: a longitudinal study. PloS one, 16(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250123.

  • Frohlich, X. 2021. The Rise (and Fall) of the Food-Drug Line, In Risk on the Table: Food Production, Health, and the Environment, edited by A. Creager, J. Gaudillière, pp. 297–329, New York: Berghahn Books.

  • Gaupp, F., C. Ruggeri Laderchi, H. Lotze-Campen, F. DeClerck, B. L. Bodirsky, S. Lowder, A. Popp, R. Kanbur, O. Edenhofer, R. Nugent, and J. Fanzo. 2021. Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems. Nature Food 2 (12): 928–934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilcore, D. 2015. Food and health in early modern Europe: diet, medicine and society, 1450–1800. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghodoosi, B., T. West, Q. Li, G. Torrisi-Steele, and S. Dey. 2023. A systematic literature review of data literacy education. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 28 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2023.2171552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2014. Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology 55 (S9): S147–S153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L. A. 2007. Food, drugs, and Droods: a historical consideration of definitions and categories in american Food and Drug Law. Cornell Law Review, 93, http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol93/iss5/16.

  • Guest, G., E. Namey, and M. Chen. 2020. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One, 15(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.

  • Guthman, J. 2011. Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. Berkely, CA: Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, M. S. 2015. Retired or not, the theory of planned behaviour will always be with us. Health Psychology Review 9 (2): 125–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han, T. I., and L. Stoel. 2017. Explaining socially responsible consumer behavior: a Meta- analytic review of theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 29 (2): 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, T. 2011. Practice-ing Behaviour Change: applying Social Practice Theory to Pro- environmental Behaviour Change. Journal of Consumer Culture 11 (1): 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E., and J. Van Bavel. 2021. Preregistered replication of “Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority”. Psychological Science 32 (3): 451–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HLPE. 2017. Nutrition and food systems. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome, https://www.fao.org/3/i7846e/i7846e.pdf.

  • Hvitsand, C., and G. K. A. Leikvoll. 2023. Alternative food networks: motivations for engaging in and the contribution to more organic production and consumption of food in REKO networks in Norway. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 47 (3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2164823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. H., and J. N. Cappella. 2008. Echo chamber: rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. 1978. Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American journal of Sociology 84 (2): 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushwah, S., A. Dhir, M. Sagar, and B. Gupta. 2019. Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers. Appetite, 143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104402.

  • Laurence, J., and L. Bentley. 2016. Does ethnic diversity have a negative effect on attitudes towards the community? A longitudinal analysis of the causal claims within the ethnic diversity and social cohesion debate. European Sociological Review 32 (1): 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letki, N. 2008. Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in british neighbourhoods. Political Studies 56 (1): 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, B. 2017. Digital Humanities Pedagogy as essential Liberal Education: a Framework for Curriculum Development. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 11 (3): 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., and C. Taber. 2013. The rationalizing voter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, R. 2021. Milk’s flows: making and transmitting kinship, health, and personhood. Medical Humanities 47 (3): 375–379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGreevy, S. R., C. D. Rupprecht, D. Niles, A. Wiek, M. Carolan, G. Kallis, K. Kantamaturapoj, A. Mangnus, P. Jehlička, O. Taherzadeh, and M. Sahakian. 2022. Sustainable agrifood systems for a post-growth world. Nature sustainability 5 (12): 1011–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J., and L. Smith-Lovin. 1987. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review 52 (3): 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. 1986. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin.

  • Mol, A. 2013. Mind your plate! The ontonorms of dutch dieting. Social studies of science 43 (3): 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montefrio, M., J. De Chavez, A. Contreras, and D. Erasga. 2020. Hybridities and awkward constructions in philippine locavorism: reframing global-local dynamics through assemblage thinking. Food Culture & Society 23 (2): 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, T., E. Nisbet, and M. Nisbet. 2018. Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 27 (8): 985–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. T., Q. Zhang, S. U. Rehman, M. Usman, and D. N. Palmucci. 2022. Organic food and obesity: factors influencing actual purchase of organic food in COVID-19 pandemic with moderating role of organic food availability. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2022-0120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oraman, Y. 2014. An analytic study of organic food industry as part of healthy eating habit in Turkey: market growth, challenges and prospects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 150: 1030–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, S. M., B. C. Tan, and T. C. Lau. 2021. Antecedents of consumers’ purchase intention towards organic food: integration of theory of planned behavior and protection motivation theory. Sustainability, 13(9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095218.

  • Paxson, H. 2008. Post-pasteurian cultures: the microbiopolitics of raw‐milk cheese in the United States. Cultural anthropology 23 (1): 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, G., A. M. Peluso, and G. Guido. 2012. Determinants of regular and occasional consumers’ intentions to buy organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs 46 (1): 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radojević, V., M. Tomaš Simin, D. Glavaš Trbić, and D. Milić. 2021. A profile of organic food consumers—Serbia case-study. Sustainability, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010131.

  • Rapley, T. 2008. Distributed decision making: the anatomy of decisions-in‐action. Sociology of health & illness 30 (3): 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. 2016. Practice theory as flat ontology. In Practice theory and research, edited by T. Schatzki, pp. 44–58, New York: Routledge.

  • Southerton, D., A. Warde, and M. Hand. 2004. The Limited Autonomy of the Consumer: Implications for Sustainable Consumption. Pp. 32–48 in Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision, edited by D Southerton, H Chappells, and B Van Vliet. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Strathern, M. 1996. Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (3): 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, S. F., B. Barbosa, H. Cunha, and Z. Oliveira. 2022. Exploring the antecedents of organic food purchase intention: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010242.

  • Thomas, W., and D. Thomas. 2018 (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Forgotten Books.

  • Tracy, S., and R. Vaughn. 2019. Guest editors’ introduction: on the creative destruction of food as science. Food Culture & Society 22 (5): 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltower, S. 2023. Organic Food sales growth outpaces Rest of Grocery Industry. Business News Daily Feb 21, https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/2404-organic-industry-healthy-growth.html.

  • Wang, H., B. Ma, D. Cudjoe, R. Bai, and M. Farrukh. 2022. How does perceived severity of COVID-19 influence purchase intention of organic food? British Food Journal 124 (11): 3353–3367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. 2005. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5: 131–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watsky, D. 2022. How much more expensive is it to buy Organic? We do the Math. CNET Nov 1st, https://www.cnet.com/home/kitchen-and-household/how-much-more-expensive-is-organic/.

  • Winner, L. 1985. Do artifacts have polities? In The social shaping of technology, edited by D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, pp. 26–38 Milton Keynes, England. Open University Press.

  • Worosz, M. R., B. Farrell, and C. A. Jenda. 2020. Teaching critical thinking via the” wicked problem” of food insecurity. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 20 (4): 621–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuriev, A., M. Dahmen, P. Paillé, O. Boiral, and L. Guillaumie. 2020. Pro-environmental behaviors through the Lens of the theory of Planned Behavior: a scoping review. Resources Conservation and Recycling 155, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the reviewers for their invaluable comments and to those who participated in this research. The project was supported with Hatch Act funds. Any errors and omissions are my responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, B241 Clark, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    Michael Carolan

Authors
  1. Michael Carolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Carolan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carolan, M. When justifications are mistaken for motivations: COVID-related dietary changes at the food-health decision-making nexus. Agric Hum Values 41, 313–330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10491-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10491-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation