Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-enchanting meat: how sacred meaning-making strengthens the ethical meat movement

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropologists have long documented rituals that reinforce the social and spiritual aspects of killing and eating animals. The historical processes of modernization, industrialization, and the spread of market capitalism have driven many such references to sacredness out of meat production in North America, leading dominant social relations around meat into what Max Weber famously termed “disenchantment.” In this article, I argue that re-enchanting discourses are one technique being used to develop the alternative production models of ethically raised meat—animals raised for human consumption with priority on sustainability and well-being. As people redesign a food system that resists the meat industry’s churn of pigs, cows, and chickens from feed lot to factory, they are not just rearranging the material structures of production. They also foster discourses and practices of sacredness, mutuality, and wonder. Ethical meat advocates use these discourses particularly to make sense of conflicts regarding the non-commodifiable nature of mortality and harmony. This article draws on ethnographic research among Southern Wisconsin butchers, farmers, and customers as well as public discourse analysis to trace meaning-making strategies that powerfully counter the commercial meat industry by re-enchanting meat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In accordance with the IRB, participants were given the option to use a pseudonym or their own first name. Published sources are referenced by name.

  2. Note that the term ethical meat is sometimes used to describe vegan meat alternatives and lab-based cultured meat products, which are not covered here.

Abbreviations

MOSES:

Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service

References

  • ---. 2014. Cooked: a natural history of transformation. New York: Penguin.

  • American Meat Institute, and Sealed Air. 2016. How interested are you in locally sourced meat and poultry? [Graph]. In Statistica. https://www.statista.com/statistics/300058/meat-market-us-consumers--interest-in-locally-sourced-meat-and-poultry/?locale=en. Accessed 27 March 2023.

  • Bali, Niti. n.d. Expansion lifestyle. Farm to fork meat riot. https://www.farmtoforkmeatriot.org/food-church. Accessed 12 November 2021.

  • Barlett, Peggy F. 2008. Reason and reenchantment in cultural change. Current Anthropology 49 (6): 1077–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Wendell. 1996. The unsettling of America: culture & agriculture. Revised edition. San Francisco: Counterpoint.

  • Bjorkdahl, Kristian, and Syse Karen Lykke. 2021. From ritual loss of life to loss of living rituals: On judicialization of slaughter and denial of animal death. In Changing meat cultures: Food practices, global capitalism, and the consumption of animals, eds. Arve Hansen and Karen Lykke Syse, 17–34. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Block, Fred. 1990. Postindustrial possibilities: a critique of economic discourse. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, B., M. Van Huik, F. K. Eveillardc, and A. Dockes. 2007. Farmers’ relationship with different animals: the importance of getting close to the animals. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 15 (3): 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Katherine. 2009. Economics and Morality: Introduction. In Economics and morality: Anthropological approaches, eds. Katherine Browne and Lynne Milgram, 1–40. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

  • Cairns, K., and J. Johnston. 2018. On (not) knowing where your food comes from: meat, mothering, and ethical eating. Agriculture and Human Values 35: 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certifiedhumane.org. n.d. Our mission. Certified humane. https://certifiedhumane.org/. Accessed 13 February 2023.

  • Clark, Melissa. 2019. The vegetarians who turned into butchers. The New York Times, 6 August. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/dining/butchers-meat-vegetarian-vegan.html.

  • Curry, Janel. 2008. Globalization and the problem of the nature/culture boundary. In After modernity?: secularity, globalization, and the re-enchantment of the world, ed. James K. A. Smith, 183–202. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Kenneth. 1993. Regenerative food systems: broadening the scope and agenda of sustainability. In Food for the future, ed. Patricia Allen, 75–102. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Camas. 2018. Killing it: an education. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, Laura B. 2011. Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2): 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9263-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri, Carolyn. 2010. Marketing us organic foods: recent trends from farms to consumers. In Emerging issues in the u.s. organic food industry, ed. Trevor J. Cochran, 32–62. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, Klaus. 1996. The social construction of nature: a sociology of ecological enlightenment. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efstathiou, Sophia. 2021. Meat we don’t greet: How ‘sausages’ can free pigs or how effacing livestock makes room for emancipation. In Changing meat cultures: Food practices, global capitalism, and the consumption of animals, eds. Arve Hansen and Karen Lykke Syse, 165–84. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Eiss, P. K. 2002. Hunting for the virgin: meat, money, and memory in tetiz, yucatán. Cultural Anthropology 17: 291–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, D. 2011. Slaughterhouse shortage stunting area’s eat-local movement. The New York Times Online, 7 April. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/us/08bcslaughterhouse.html?pagewanted=a.

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Convention. 2012. Journal of the General Convention of the Episcopal Church, Indianapolis. New York: General Convention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindrajan, R. 2015. ‘The goat that died for family’: animal sacrifice and interspecies kinship in India’s central Himalayas. American Ethnologist 42: 504–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Hal. 2011. Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: why it’s so hard to think straight about animals. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C., and Clare. 2003. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00040-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobgood-Oster, Laura. 2010. The Friends we keep: unleashing Christianity’s Compassion for Animals. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Brandi. 2017. Making local food work: the challenges and opportunities of today’s small farmers. Iowa City: University Of Iowa Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Richard. 2000. Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies 1 (1): 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Josée, Anelyse Weiler, and Shyon Baumann. 2022. The cultural imaginary of ethical meat: a study of producer perceptions. Journal of Rural Studies 89: 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, Barbara. 2003. Foreword. In The essential agrarian reader: the future of culture, community, and the land, ed. Norman Wirzba, ix–xvii. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D., and M. Biesele. 1978. Eland hunting rituals among northern and southern San groups: striking similarities. Africa 48 (2): 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan, Steve, Nick Haslam, and Brock Bastian. 2010. The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite 55 (1): 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundström, M. 2019. ‘We do this because the market demands it’: alternative meat production and the speciesist logic. Agriculture and Human Values 36: 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarraher, Eugene. 2019. The enchantments of mammon: capitalism as the religion of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn. 1990. The death of nature: women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele, Mara, and Bettina Bock. 2007. Competing discourses of farm animal welfare and agri-food restructuring. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15 (3): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, Ann V., and Jorge Chapa. 2013. Apple pie and enchiladas: latino newcomers in the rural midwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Restaurant Association. 2018. Leading trends in culinary themes on restaurant menus in the United States in 2018 [Graph]. In Statistica. https://www.statista.com/statistics/293972/leading-trends-in-culinary-themes-on-restaurant-menus-us/?locale=en. Accessed 27 March 2023.

  • National Agriculture Statistics Service. 2016. Overview of the united states slaughter industry. USDA. https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/b5644r52v.

  • Pilgrim, Karyn. 2013. ‘Happy cows,’ ‘happy beef’: a critique of the rationales for ethical meat. Environmental Humanities 3 (1): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, Michael. 2002. An animal’s place. New York Times Magazine 10 November: 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothgerber, Hank. 2015. Can you have your meat and eat it too? Conscientious omnivores, vegetarians, and adherence to diet. Appetite 84 (January): 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, Paul. 1997. Why we eat what we eat, and why we worry about it. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 50 (5): 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, Kajsa Resare, and Joanna Trewern. 2022. A systematic review of the definitions and interpretations in scientific literature of ‘less but better’ meat in high-income settings. Nature Food 3 (6): 454–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1990. Food as symbolic code. In Culture and society: contemporary debates, eds. Jeffrey C. Alexander, and Steven Seidman, 94–104. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 2017. Against the grain: a deep history of the earliest states. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, Roger. 2004. The conscientious carnivore. In Food for thought: the debate over eating meat, ed. Steve F. Sapontzis, 81–91. Amherst, NY: Promethius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severson, Kim. 2009. Young idols with cleavers rule the stage. New York Times. 7 July. Retreived from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/dining/08butch.html.

  • Sheard, Brandon. n.d. Philosophy. Farmstead meatsmith (blog). https://farmsteadmeatsmith.com/philosophy/. Accessed 1 July 2020.

  • Singer, Peter, and Jim Mason. 2007. The ethics of what we eat: why our food choices matter. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, James K. A., ed. 2008. After modernity?: secularity, globalization, and the re-enchantment of the world. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steven D. 2010. The disenchantment of secular discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stinnett, A Ashley. 2013. ‘Blood-talk’: A language network analysis of english speaking heritage butchers in the southwestern united states. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from University of Arizona repository.

  • Stull, Donald D., and Michael J. Broadway. 2012. Slaughterhouse blues: The meat and poultry industry in North America. 2nd Edition. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

  • Thompson, E. P. 1971. The Moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present 50: 76–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Jennifer Jo, and Ashley Stinnett. 2018. Confronting the Goldilocks problem: encountering ‘the middle’ in anthropological studies of food and agriculture. Culture Agriculture Food and the Environment 40 (2): 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Translated by H. H. Gerth. Oxford University Press.

  • Weis, Tony. 2016. Industrial livestock and the ecological hoofprint. In Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies, eds. M. Shucksmith, and D. L. Brown., New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, Philip T., trans. 1964. The roman ritual. Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirzba, Norman. 2008. Agrarianism after modernity: an opening for grace. In After modernity?: secularity, globalization, and the re-enchantment of the world, ed. James K. A. Smith, 241–258. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zezima, K. 2010. Push to eat local is hampered by shortage. The New York Times, 27 March. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/28slaughter.html?ref=us.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank all those who participated in this research, including Robert and Shayba Pierce who first encouraged my interests in researching farming. The critical feedback of anonymous reviewers greatly improved this article, as well as the many contributions of research assistant Anna Cole. I am grateful for funding support from Wheaton College Global Curriculum Grant, and for the many students whose curiosity fueled my learning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Jeske.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeske, C. Re-enchanting meat: how sacred meaning-making strengthens the ethical meat movement. Agric Hum Values 41, 135–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10477-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10477-9

Keywords

Navigation