Skip to main content
Log in

Crafting the wild: growing ginseng in the simulated wild in Appalachia

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is a slow-growing medicinal root native to eastern North America. Though it is possible to farm, wild ginseng can sell for twenty (or more) times as much as cultivated ginseng. Declining wild ginseng populations due to habitat loss and overharvesting has led to harvest restrictions, but strong demand for wild ginseng remains. One potential solution is “wild-simulated” ginseng, where ginseng is grown under conditions crafted to mimic a wild forest with the goal of producing roots that look wild. I contend, however, that despite the fact that wild-simulated ginseng grows in a habitat actively tended and monitored by humans, is nevertheless wild. I explore wildness as “productive unruliness” and show how wild-simulated ginseng actively crafts wildness through management to maintain if not add complexity, to foster unpredictability, or to facilitate stress. Furthermore, the habitat that wild-simulated ginseng growers are attempting to emulate—“wild” Appalachian woodlands dominated by an assemblage of “native” plants that pre-date the arrival of Europeans in the Americas—are themselves the product of human manipulation. In Appalachia, the boundaries between the wild and the cultivated are blurred. Wild-simulated ginseng is an example of how conservation goals can be achieved by crafting “wild” environments that are not untouched, pristine wildernesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wilderness Act of 1964, 16 U.S. C. 1131–1136 (1964).

  2. “wild, adj. and n.”. OED Online. March 2022. Oxford University Press. https://www-oed-com.libproxy.wustl.edu/view/Entry/228988 (accessed March 20, 2022).

  3. All interlocutors’ names in this paper, including Brian’s, are pseudonyms, and I am intentionally vague about precise locations.

References

  • Adams, Kip P., and R. Joseph Hamilton. 2011. Management History. In Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer, ed. David G. Hewitt. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. Kat. 2005. Tending the Wild: Native American Knowledge and the Management of California’s Natural Resources. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arik, Murat, Ying Gao, and Bronwyn Graves. 2020. Implications of Changing Supply Chain Dynamics of Global Ginseng Trade: A Pilot Study. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 15 (1): 73–92. https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v15i1.2729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jane. 2002. Thoreau’s Nature: Ethics, Politics, and the Wild. Revised. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, Eric P., Sarah E. Nilson, Cathryn V. Pugh, and Grady H. Zuiderveen. 2021. Neither Wild nor Cultivated: American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) Seller Surveys Provide Insights into In Situ Planting and Husbandry. Economic Botany 75 (2): 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-021-09521-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, Martha A., Kathryn M. Flinn, Jean Jancaitis, Ashley Alley, and Amy Paxton. 2007. Declining Abundance of American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) Documented by Herbarium Specimens. Biological Conservation 134 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lan, and Paul D. Mitchell. 2009. Status of the Wisconsin Ginseng Industry. Madison: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin‐Madison. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4f449f654bbebc0838ac73c08c23fb0bbc0b8a00.

  • Cronon, William. 1996. The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. In Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: Norton.

  • Denevan, William M. 1992. The Pristine Myth: The Landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82 (3): 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiler, Lyntha Scott. 1995. A Box of Cultivated Ginseng from Out-of-State at Randy’s Recycling in Peytona, West Virginia. Photograph. Library of Congress Coal River Folklife Collection. https://www.loc.gov/resource/afc1999008.afc1999008_crf_lec03012/.

  • Fairhead, James, and Melissa Leach. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, Jill. 2011. Missionaries to the Wilderness: A History of Land, Identity, and Moral Geography in Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies 17 (1/2): 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, Jack. 2020. Wild Things: The Disorder of Desire. Durham: Duke University Press Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hufford, Mary. 2002. Reclaiming the Commons: Narratives of Progress, Preservation, and Ginseng. In Culture, Environment, and Conservation in the Appalachian South, ed. Benita J. Howell. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Karl. 2014. Crimes Against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, Iriarte, Sarah Elliott, S. Yoshi Maezumi, Daiana Alves, Regina Gonda, Mark Robinson, Jonas Gregorio de Souza, Jennifer Watling, and Josephine Handley. 2020. The Origins of Amazonian Landscapes: Plant Cultivation, Domestication and the Spread of Food Production in Tropical South America. Quaternary Science Reviews 248 (November): 106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland, Kevin, Blake Matthews, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2016. An Introduction to Niche Construction Theory. Evolutionary Ecology 30 (2): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9821-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Law, Justine. 2022. The Knotty Politics of Ginseng Conservation and Management in Appalachia. Journal of Political Ecology 29: 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, Jamie. 2015. Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation After Nature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manget, Luke. 2022. Ginseng Diggers: A History of Root and Herb Gathering in Appalachia. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, Emma. 2013. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, James, and Mary Ann Furedi. 2005. Deer Browsing and Population Viability of a Forest Understory Plant. Science 307 (5711): 920–922.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, Bill. 2003. The End of Nature. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Roderick. 2014. Wilderness and the American Mind, 5th ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfont, Kathryn. 2012. Blue Ridge Commons: Environmental Activism and Forest History in Western North Carolina. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Seema, and Abdur Rauf. 2017. Adaptogenic Herb Ginseng (Panax) as Medical Food: Status Quo and Future Prospects. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 85 (January): 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plattner, Anna. 2020. The Future of Wild-Simulated Ginseng. The Association for Temperate Agroforestry. https://www.aftaweb.org/latest-newsletter/temporate-agroforester/145-2020-vol-26/volume-26-no-1-february-2020/265-the-future-of-wild-simulated-ginseng.html.

  • Pollard, Kelvin, and Linda A. Jacobsen. 2021. The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2015–2019 American Community Survey. Washington, D.C.: Appalachian Regional Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, Thomas P., and Donald M. Waller. 2003. Direct and Indirect Effects of White-Tailed Deer in Forest Ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 181 (1–2): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00130-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan, Tom. 1990. The Prairie as Perennial Symbol. In Proceedings of the Twelfth North American Prairie Conference: Recapturing a Vanishing Heritage. University of Northern Iowa.

  • Schlag, Erin M., and Marla S. McIntosh. 2006. Ginsenoside Content and Variation Among and Within American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) Populations. Phytochemistry 67 (14): 1510–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.05.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, John Paul, Jennifer Cruse-Sanders, James L. Chamberlain, Susana Ferreira, and John A. Young. 2019. Explaining Harvests of Wild-Harvested Herbaceous Plants: American Ginseng as a Case Study. Biological Conservation 231 (March): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, Louise. 2018. Becoming Wild: The Contradictory Aesthetics of Wild Land and Wind Farms. Environment, Space, Place 10 (1): 111. https://doi.org/10.5749/envispacplac.10.1.0111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bruce D. 2011. A Cultural Niche Construction Theory of Initial Domestication. Biological Theory 6 (3): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0028-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, Michael T. 1986. Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, James Morton. 2012. The Promise of Wilderness: American Environmental Politics Since 1964. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lear, David H., and Thomas A. Waldrop. 1989. History, Uses, and Effects of Fire in the Appalachians. General Technical Report SE-54. Asheville: USDA Forest Service.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jing-Rong, Chiu-Yin Leung, Hing-Man Ho, Stella Chai, Lee-Fong Yau, Zhong-Zhen Zhao, and Zhi-Hong Jiang. 2010. Quantitative Comparison of Ginsenosides and Polyacetylenes in Wild and Cultivated American Ginseng. Chemistry & Biodiversity 7 (4): 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200900264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West, Paige, and Dan Brockington. 2006. An Anthropological Perspective on Some Unexpected Consequences of Protected Areas. Conservation Biology 20 (3): 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00432.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 2016. Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life, 1st ed. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, a Division of W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, Graham E., J.L. Hamrick, and Dorset W. Trapnell. 2021. The Role of Anthropogenic Dispersal in Shaping the Distribution and Genetic Composition of a Widespread North American Tree Species. Ecology and Evolution 11 (16): 11515–11532. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7944.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeder, Melinda. 2016. Domestication as a Model System for Niche Construction Theory. Evolutionary Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-015-9801-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author has received no grants to fund this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Farley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Katherine Farley declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farley, K. Crafting the wild: growing ginseng in the simulated wild in Appalachia. Agric Hum Values 41, 121–133 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10475-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10475-x

Keywords

Navigation