Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An equivalence study of interview platform: Does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups?

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Web-based interviewing may be an effective element of a medical school’s larger approach to promotion of holistic review, as recommended by the Association of American Medical Colleges, by facilitating the feasibility of including rural and community physicians in the interview process. Only 10% of medical schools offer videoconference interviews to applicants and little is known about the impact of this interview modality on the admissions process. This study investigated the impact of overall acceptance rates using videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews in the medical school selection process using an equivalence trial design. The University of New Mexico School of Medicine integrated a videoconferencing interview option for community and rural physician interviewers in a pseudo-random fashion during the 2014–2016 admissions cycles. Logistic regression was conducted to examine whether videoconference interviews impacted acceptance rates or the characteristics of accepted students. Demographic, admissions and diversity factors were analyzed that included applicant age, MCAT score, cumulative GPA, gender, underrepresented in medicine, socioeconomic status and geographic residency. Data from 752 interviews were analyzed. Adjusted rates of acceptance for face-to-face (37.0%; 95% CI 28.2, 46.7%) and videoconference (36.1%; 95% CI 17.8, 59.5%) interviews were within an a priori ± 5% margin of equivalence. Both interview conditions yielded highly diverse groups of admitted students. Having a higher medical college admission test score, grade point average, and self-identifying as disadvantaged increased odds of admission in both interview modalities. Integration of the videoconference interview did not impact the overall acceptance of a highly diverse and qualified group of applicants, and allowed rural and community physicians to participate in the medical school interview process as well as allowed campus faculty and medical student committee members to interview remotely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addams, A. N., Bletzinger, R. B., Sondheimer, H. M., White, S. E., & Johnson, L. M. (2010). Roadmap to diversity: Integrating holistic review practices into medical school admission processes. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2012). National healthcare quality and disparities reports, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqrdr11/qrdr11.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2016.

  • American College of Physicians. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparities in health care, Updated 2010, Philadelphia, PA. http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/current_policy_papers/assets/racial_disparities.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2013.

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. (2006). America needs a more diverse physician workforce, Washington, DC. https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/pressrel/2006/physician_diversity_facts.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2010.

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. (2012). Using MCAT data in medical student selection, Washington, DC. https://www.aamc.org/students/download/267622/data/mcatstudentselectionguide.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.

  • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Medical School Admissions Requirements (MSAR) for U.S. and Canadian Medical Schools report. https://services.aamc.org/msar/schoolDetails/4947/selectionFactors. Accessed 8 Mar 2016.

  • Ballejos, M. P., Olsen, P., Price-Johnson, T., et al. (2018). Recruiting American Indian/Alaska Native Students to Medical School: A Multi-Institutional Alliance in the U.S. Southwest. Academic Medicine, 93(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballejos, M., Rhyne, R., & Parkes, J. (2015). Increasing the relative weight of noncognitive admission criteria improves underrepresented minority admission rates to medical school. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 27(2), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibler Zaidi, N., Santen, S., Purkiss, J., Teener, C., & Gay, S. (2016). A hybrid interview model for medical school interviews. Academic Medicine, 91(11), 1526–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, A. L., Palmer, S. R., & Winnick, S. Y. (2008). Roadmap to diversity: Key legal and educational policy foundations for medical schools. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daram, S., Wu, R., & Tang, S. (2014). Interview from anywhere: Feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 109(2), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, D., Sondheimer, H., Castillo-Page, L., & Bletzinger, R. B. (2011). Medical school admissions: More than grades and test scores analysis in brief. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edje, L., Miller, C., Kiefer, J., & Oram, D. (2013). Using Skype as an alternative for residency selection interviews. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(3), 503–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Johnson, E., & Molidor, J. (1990). The interview in the admission process. Academic Medicine, 65(3), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddouk, L. (2014). Intersubjectivity in video interview. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199, 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddouk, L. (2015). Presence at a distance. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 219, 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E., Bortoletto, P., & Ayogu, N. (2016). Residency interviews in the 21st century. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(3), 322–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E., Bortoletto, P., & Ayogu, N. (2017). Using video-conference interviews in the residency application process. Academic Medicine, 92(6), 728–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, D., & Prescott, J. (2013). From rankings to mission. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1064–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter, C. (2013). A proposal for evaluating the validity of holistic-based admission processes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(1), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, K., Henderson, M., & Kirch, D. (2013). Selecting tomorrow’s physicians. Academic Medicine, 88(12), 1806–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melendez, M., Dobryansky, M., & Alizadeh, K. (2012). Live online video interviews dramatically improve the plastic surgery residency application process. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 130(1), 240e–241e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, F. (2010). The social mission of medical education: Ranking the schools. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(12), 804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasadhika, S., Altenbernd, T., Ober, R., Harvey, E., & Miller, J. (2012). Residency interview video conferencing. Ophthalmology, 119(2), 426–426.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D., Altman, D., Pocock, S., Evans, S., & CONSORT Group. (2006). Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA, 295(10), 1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, S., & Shipman, S. (2006). The rationale for diversity in the health professions: A review of the evidence. United States: Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources Administration, Bureau of Health Professions.

  • Shah, S., Arora, S., Skipper, B., Kalishman, S., Timm, T., & Smith, A. (2012). Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. The Journal of Urology, 187(4), 1380–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, A. Y., Nelson, A. R., & Smedle, B. D. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, M., & Lagzdins, M. (2014). Streamlining the residency interview process using Web-based teleconferencing. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 71(9), 697–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiller, D., O’Mara, D., Rothnie, I., Dunn, S., Lee, L., & Roberts, C. (2013). Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes. Medical Education, 47(8), 801–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadi, M., Malkin, M., Lenart, J., Stier, G., Gatling, J., & Applegate, R., II. (2016). Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: A pilot study. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the University of New Mexico School of Medicine Admissions Committee and Office of Admissions staff, which were instrumental in the successful implementation of the videoconference interview and remote web-based participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlene P. Ballejos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballejos, M.P., Oglesbee, S., Hettema, J. et al. An equivalence study of interview platform: Does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 23, 601–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9817-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9817-2

Keywords

Navigation