Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agroecological farm analysis based on the 3D sustainability model approach

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sustainability analysis of an agroecosystem is complex, given the multiple dimensions proposed by both the sustainable development and agroecology thematics. In this context, the 3D sustainability model proposed by Mauerhofer (2008) was chosen as the basis for this research, mainly because it includes the three dimensions—environmental, social and economic—but also because they are presented at another discussion level, in a cone. This cone represents a hierarchy, where its walls correspond to the carrying capacity and its base corresponds to capitals. Likewise, this model, besides organizing the dimensions in a hierarchical way, makes an in-depth analysis by presenting the relationships among capacities and capitals. Given agriculture’s importance to the survival of humankind and all social and environmental impacts related to this segment, the present research was developed towards an operational proposal of a specific 3D model for the analysis of agroecological farms located near or inside conservation units, since the original model has a global scale. In addition, this model could be applied in any agroecological farm of the world near or inside protected areas taking into consideration each particular context and making the necessary adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from Mauerhofer (2008, p. 498)

Fig. 2

Reproduced with permission from Mauerhofer (2008, p. 498)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri MA (1987) Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (2010) Agroecologia, agricultura camponesa e soberania alimentar. Revista Nera 13(16):22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M, Nicholls C (2006) Sistema agroecologico rápido de evaluación de calidad de suelo y salud de cultivos em el agroecosistema de café. In: Moura EG, Aguiar ACF (eds) O desenvolvimento rural como forma de ampliação dos direitos no campo: princípios e tecnologias. UEMA – Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, São Luiz, pp 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Backmann M, Pies I (2008) Sustainability by corporate citizenship—the moral dimension of sustainability. J Corp Citizsh 31:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CM, Sandstrom WA, Gómez MEF, Méndez VE, Santos R, Goldoftas B, Dougherty I (2014) Explaining the ‘hungry farmer paradox’: smallholders and fair trade cooperatives navigate seasonality and change in Nicaragua’s corn and coffee markets. Glob Environ Change 125:33–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. Lei nº 12.651 de 25 de maio de (2012) Dispõe sobre a vegetação nativa e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília

  • Cáceres DM (2006) Agrobiodiversity and technology in resource-poor farms. Interciencia 31(6):403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarano AM, Abramovay R (1999) Êxodo Rural, Envelhecimento e Masculinização no Brasil: Panorama dos Últimos 50 Anos. IPEA, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Capobiango RP, Braga MJ, Silveira SFR, Costa CCM (2013) Análise do Impacto Econômico do Crédito Rural na Microrregião de Pirapora. Rev Econ Sociol Rural 50(4):631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporal FR, Paulus G, Costabeber JA (2009) Agroecologia: uma ciência do campo da complexidade. MDS, Embrapa, Brasília-DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalinho HD, Martins SR, Silva JB, Lopes AS (2007) Qualidade do solo como indicador de sustentabilidade de agroecossistemas. Revista Brasileira de Agrociência 13(2):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlam A, Cohen P, Holmes B, Kleiner K, Mackenzie D, Nowak R, Pearce F (2002) Beyond organics. New Sci 2343:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa IV (2007) Indicadores de Sustentabilidade para Agroecossistemas em Transição Agroecológica na Região Sul do Rio Grande do Sul. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

  • Didier T, Lucie S (2008) Measuring consumer’s willingness to pay for organic and Fair Trade products. Int J Consum Stud 32:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (2001) Canibals with forks. Capstone Publishing Ltda, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov AM (2000) Ecosystem functioning and intrinsic value of biodiversity. Oikos 90(2):408–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman SR (2006) Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems. CRC Press, Santa Cruz

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matos-Filho AM (2004) Agricultura orgânica sob a perspectiva da sustentabilidade: uma análise da região de Florianópolis—SC, Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

  • Mauerhofer V (2008) 3-D Sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 64:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2012) A ‘Legislation-Check’ based on ‘3-D Sustainability’—addressing global precautionary land governance. Land Use Policy 29:652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2013) Social capital, social capacity and social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures 53:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Luna P, Brook BW, Zetina-Rejón MJ, Cruz-Escalona VH (2004) The carrying capacity of ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell P (2005) Race, class and the global politics of environmental inequality. Glob Environ Polit 5(3):70–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali PL (2012) Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. PNAS 109(32):12302–12308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz G (2006) Relações com o mercado e (re) construção das identidades sócio profissionais na agricultura orgânica. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

  • Severo LS, Pedrozo EA (2008) Agricultura orgânica na região do Vale do Caí (RS): racionalidade substantiva ou instrumental? Revista de Administração Mackenzie 9(2):58–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76(2):265–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Soldat V (2009) A quantitative and qualitative historical analysis of the scientific discipline of Agroecology. Int J Agr Sustain 7(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship granted for Gabriele Volkmer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Volkmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volkmer, G., Pedrozo, E.Á. Agroecological farm analysis based on the 3D sustainability model approach. Agroforest Syst 93, 1001–1013 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0195-9

Keywords

Navigation