Skip to main content
Log in

The Indeterminacy Bottleneck: Implications for Habitable Worlds

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is often assumed that the transition between chemical evolution and biological evolution undergoes a smooth process; that once life has arisen, it will automatically ‘flood’ a solar system body. However, there is no a priori reason to assume that a link between them is a given. The fact that both chemical evolution and biological evolution meet in a single point can be critical. Thus, one may ask: can a world’s environment be favourable for chemical evolution but not for biological evolution, or vice versa? This is an important question worth exploration because certain worlds in the solar system in the past seemed to possess the possibility of chemical evolution, while several worlds in the present seem to exhibit such a possibility. Have such solar system bodies thus been, or are, ‘flooded’ by life? Did they possess the opportunity for biological evolution? The answer depends on the very nature of certain conditions under which evolution occurs, which may indicate that a link between chemical evolution and biological evolution is not automatically realised on a habitable solar system body. Thus, these conditions imply that in the emergence and distribution of cellular life, there exists an indeterminacy bottleneck at which chemical evolution and biological evolution meet through a single cell, whose descendants goes ‘information explosive’, ‘entropy implosive’ and ‘habitat expansive’, which determine whether life moves on to new environments. The consequence is that a world's environment can indeed be favourable for biological evolution, but not for chemical evolution. Thus, even if chemical evolution leads to the emergence of a microbial organism in a world, then it is not a given that such a first life form will be subjected to distribution to other environments; and not a given that its existence will continue in the environment it originated in. Thus, the bottleneck may be one of the decisive factors in the differences between habitable and inhabited worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An inverse proportionality is not necessarily observed in the flask of biological evolution. Although it is widely believed that single-celled organisms necessarily evolve into multi-cellular organisms, this trend is not observed in the history of life on the Earth; in Darwinian evolution, there are no lower or higher organisms, there is only reproductive success. Thus, microbial life represents the majority of life established in the past and present and will probably continue to represent the majority of life present until the continually increasing luminosity of the sun will make the Earth lose all its water or ultimately when the phases that will transform the sun into a red giant star end all life forms on this planet.

  2. It is possible that life did indeed originate in the Noachian eon and continues to exist in certain locations on the planet; however, this is not relevant to the principal discussion here.

  3. These situations do posses realism. If life e.g. emerged and was established at a hydrothermal vent, then this could have exemplified a habitat with a virtually endless energy source but with limitations in space; the organisms adapt to the parameters applicable close to the source and not to the environmental conditions further away. Thus, the organisms can continue to gain thermal energy but compel each other to move outward as they divide. Those pushed outward to a certain distance will not survive, and the hydrothermal vent where this unique population of life on an entire world exists may eventually cease to exist, as environments are dynamic and continue to change. Thus, organisms must be able to leave this environment to initiate biological evolution, because it is risky to merely stay near such a crack in the ocean floor. Of course, a considerable number of life forms exist today both at hydrothermal vents as well as in their surroundings. However, this holds true for biological evolution that has been secured; life today has secured itself with several habitats to support each other. However, in the past scenario discussed, there existed only one habitat where the organisms could live, and there existed only one population of life.

References

  • Beech M, Coulson IM, Comte M (2018) Lithopanspermia – the terrestrial input during the past 550 million years. American J Astronomy and Astrophys 6(3):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, John E. (1987)"The Paleo-Ocean of Mars". MECA Symposium on Mars: Evolution of its Climate and Atmosphere. Lunar and Planetary Institute

  • Darwin, Charles, Letter to Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1871, in Darwin, Francis (ed) (1887), The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter, 3 vols. John Murray London

  • Davies PCW, Lineweaver CH (2011) Cancer tumors as Metazoa 1.0: Tapping genes of ancient ancestors. Phys Biol 8(1):015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaye, Luis, Becerra, Arturo: Cenancestor, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, 2012, Evolution: Education and Outreach 5(3): 382-388

  • Eagon RG (1962) Psedomonas natrigens, a marine bacterium with a generation time of less than 10 minutes. J Bacteriol 83(4):736–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastook JL, Head JW (2015) Glaciation in the late Noachian icy highlands: ice accumulation, distribution, flow rates, basal melting and top-down melting rates and patterns. Planet Space Sci 106:82–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Upper K (1987) The Phylogeny of tRNA sequences provides evidence for ambiguity reduction in the origin of the genetic code, cold spring harbor symp. Quant Biol 52:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucher EAJT, Kratzer JT, Randall RN (2010) Deep phylogeny—how a tree can help characterize early life on Earth. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a002238–a002238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb BC (2015) The organic solar system. Nature Chem 7:364–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson B, Wilson DJ, Feil E, Eyre-Walker A (2018) The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc Biol Sci 285(1880):20180789

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert W (1986) The RNA World. Nature 319(6055):618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogarten JP, Taiz L (1992) Evolution of proton pumping ATPases: Rooting the tree of life. Photosynth Res 33:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs PG (2017) Chemical evolution and the evolutionary definition of life. J Mol Evol 84:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KM, Caetano-Anollés G (2011) The proteomic complexity and rise of the primordial ancestor of diversified life. BMC Evol Biol 11:140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehninger, Albert (1982) Principles of Biochemistry, Worth Publishers

  • Levin PA, Angert ER (2015) Small but mighty: cell size and bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(7):a019216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20(5):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelian K (2011) Thermodynamic dissipation theory for the origin of life Earth Syst. Dynam 2:37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson WL (2009) Ancient micronauts: interplanetary transport of microbes by cosmic impacts. Trends Microbiol 17(6):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippe H, Forterre P (1999) The rooting of the universal tree is not reliable. J Mol Evol 49:509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid IN, Sparks WB, Lubow S, McGrath M, Lifeio M, Valenti J, Sowers KR, Shukla HD, MacAuley S, Miller T, Suvanasuthi R, Belas R, Colman A, Robb FT, DasSarma P, Müller JA, Coker JA, Cavicchioli R, Chen F, DasSarma S (2006) Terrestrial models for extraterrestrial life: methanogens and halophiles at martian temperatures. Int J Astrobiol 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich A (1962) On the problems of evolution and biochemical information transfer. In: Kasha M, Pullman B (eds) Horizons in Biochemistry. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA, pp 103–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan C, Salpeter EE (1976) Particles, environments, and possible ecologies in the Jovian atmosphere. Astrophys J Suppl Series 32:737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:182–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese CR, Fox GE (1977) The concept of cellular evolution. J Mol Evol 10:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hegner I (2020a) Extremophiles: a special or general case in the search for extra-terrestrial life. Extremophiles 24:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hegner I (2020b) Interplanetary transmissions of life in an evolutionary context. Int J Astrobiol 19(4):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hegner, Ian (2020c) First principles of terrestrial life: exemplars for potential extra-terrestrial biology, HAL archives-ouvertes.fr CCSD

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian von Hegner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Hegner, I. The Indeterminacy Bottleneck: Implications for Habitable Worlds. Acta Biotheor 70, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-021-09432-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-021-09432-0

Keywords

Navigation