Skip to main content
Log in

Patient-Specific Quantification of Normal and Bicuspid Aortic Valve Leaflet Deformations from Clinically Derived Images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical benefit of patient-specific modeling of heart valve disease remains an unrealized goal, often a result of our limited understanding of the in vivo milieu. This is particularly true in assessing bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease, the most common cardiac congenital defect in humans, which leads to premature and severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency (AS/AI). However, assessment of BAV risk for AS/AI on a patient-specific basis is hampered by the substantial degree of anatomic and functional variations that remain largely unknown. The present study was undertaken to utilize a noninvasive computational pipeline (https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3142) that directly yields local heart valve leaflet deformation information using patient-specific real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic imaging (rt-3DE) data. Imaging data was collected for patients with normal tricuspid aortic valve (TAV, \(n = 8\)) and those with BAV (\(n = 5\) with fused left and right coronary leaflets and \(n = 5\) with fused right and non-coronary leaflets), from which the medial surface of each leaflet was extracted. The resulting deformation analysis resulted in, for the first time, quantified differences between the in vivo functional deformations of the TAV and BAV leaflets. Our approach was able to capture the complex, heterogeneous surface deformation fields in both TAV and BAV leaflets. We were able to identify and quantify differences in stretch patterns between leaflet types, and found in particular that stretches experienced by BAV leaflets during closure differ from those of TAV leaflets in terms of both heterogeneity as well as overall magnitude. Deformation is a key parameter in the clinical assessment of valvular function, and serves as a direct means to determine regional variations in structure and function. This study is an essential step toward patient-specific assessment of BAV based on correlating leaflet deformation and AS/AI progression, as it provides a means for assessing patient-specific stretch patterns

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal, A., G. Ferrari, E. Joyce, M. J. Daniels, R. Sainger, J. H. Gorman, R. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. Architectural trends in the human normal and bicuspid aortic valve leaflet and its relevance to valve disease. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42(5):986–998, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, A., A. M. Pouch, E. Lai, J. Lesicko, P. A. Yushkevich, J. H. Gorman, R. C. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. In-vivo heterogeneous functional and residual strains in human aortic valve leaflets. J. Biomech. 49(12):2481–2490, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayoub, S., G. Ferrari, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman, F. J. Schoen, and M. S. Sacks. Heart valve biomechanics and underlying mechanobiology. Compr. Physiol. 6(4):1743–1780, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayoub, S., C.-H. Lee, K. H. Driesbaugh, W. Anselmo, C. T. Hughes, G. Ferrari, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. Regulation of valve interstitial cell homeostasis by mechanical deformation: implications for heart valve disease and surgical repair. J. R. Soc. Interface. 14(135):20170580, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balachandran, K., P. Sucosky, H. Jo, and A. P. Yoganathan. Elevated cyclic stretch alters matrix remodeling in aortic valve cusps: implications for degenerative aortic valve disease. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 296(3):H756–H764, 2009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben Zekry, S., J. Freeman, A. Jajoo, J. He, S. H. Little, G. M. Lawrie, R. Azencott, and W. A. Zoghbi. Patient-specific quantitation of mitral valve strain by computer analysis of three-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 9(1):e003254, 2016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben Zekry, S., G. Lawrie, S. Little, W. Zoghbi, J. Freeman, A. Jajoo, S. Jain, J. He, A. Martynenko, and R. Azencott. Comparative evaluation of mitral valve strain by deformation tracking in 3D-echocardiography. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 3(4):402–412, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandra, S., N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11(7):1085–1096, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, M., T. Treasure, and D. Parker. Demographic characteristics of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for stenosis: relation to valve morphology. Heart. 75(2):174–178, 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emanuel, R., R. Withers, K. O’Brien, P. Ross, and O. Feizi. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves clinicogenetic study of 41 families. Heart. 40(12):1402–1407, 1978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evangelista, A. Bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 13(3):234–241, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huntington, K., A. G. Hunter, and K.-L. Chan. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 30(7):1809–1812, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khang, A., R. M. Buchanan, S. Ayoub, B. V. Rego, C.-H. Lee, G. Ferrari, K. S. Anseth, and M. S. Sacks. Mechanobiology of the heart valve interstitial cell: Simulation, experiment, and discovery. In: Mechanobiology in Health and Disease, edited by S. Verbruggen. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khang, A., R. M. Buchanan, S. Ayoub, B. V. Rego, C.-H. Lee, and M. S. Sacks. Biological mechanics of the heart valve interstitial cell. In: Advances in Heart Valve Biomechanics, edited by M. S. Sacks, and J. Liao. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 3–36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Loop, C. Smooth subdivision surfaces based on triangles. Master’s thesis, University of Utah, 1987.

  16. Merritt, B. A., A. Turin, M. Markl, S. C. Malaisrie, P. M. McCarthy, and J. C. Carr. Association between leaflet fusion pattern and thoracic aorta morphology in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 40(2):294–300, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merryman, W. D., H. D. Lukoff, R. A. Long, G. C. Engelmayr Jr., R. A. Hopkins, and M. S. Sacks. Synergistic effects of cyclic tension and transforming growth factor-β1 on the aortic valve myofibroblast. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 16(5):268–276, 2007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Narang, H., B. V. Rego, A. H. Khalighi, A. Aly, A. M. Pouch, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. Pre-surgical prediction of ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence using in vivo mitral valve leaflet strains. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02772-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piegl, L., and W. Tiller. The NURBS Book. New York: Springer, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pouch, A. M., S. Tian, M. Takebe, J. Yuan, R. Gorman Jr., A. T. Cheung, H. Wang, B. M. Jackson, J. H. Gorman III., R. C. Gorman, et al. Medially constrained deformable modelling for segmentation of branching medial structures: application to aortic valve segmentation and morphometry. Med. Image Anal. 26(1):217–231, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rego, B. V., A. H. Khalighi, A. Drach, E. K. Lai, A. M. Pouch, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. A noninvasive method for the determination of in vivo mitral valve leaflet strains. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 34(12):e3142, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rego, B. V., and M. S. Sacks. A functionally graded material model for the transmural stress distribution of the aortic valve leaflet. J. Biomech. 54:88–95, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rego, B. V., S. M. Wells, C.-H. Lee, and M. S. Sacks. Mitral valve leaflet remodelling during pregnancy: insights into cell-mediated recovery of tissue homeostasis. J. R. Soc. Interface. 13(125):20160709, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rego, B. V., S. M. Wells, C.-H. Lee, and M. S. Sacks. Remodelling potential of the mitral heart valve leaflet. In: Advances in Heart Valve Biomechanics, edited by M. S. Sacks, and J. Liao. New York: Springer, 2018, pp. 181–206.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sidak, Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62(318):626–633, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weinberg, E. J., and M. R. K. Mofrad. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. J. Biomech. 41(16):3482–3487, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, F., S. Morganti, R. Zakerzadeh, D. Kamensky, F. Auricchio, A. Reali, T. J. Hughes, M. S. Sacks, and M.-C. Hsu. A framework for designing patient-specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 34(4):e2938, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yap, C.-H., L. P. Dasi, and A. P. Yoganathan. Dynamic hemodynamic energy loss in normal and stenosed aortic valves. J. Biomech. Eng. 132(2):021005, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yushkevich, P. A., J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett, R. G. Smith, S. Ho, J. C. Gee, and G. Gerig. Userguided 3d active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 31(3):1116–1128, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yushkevich, P. A., H. Zhang, and J. C. Gee. Continuous medial representation for anatomical structures. IEEE Rrans. Med. Imaging. 25(12):1547–1564, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, W., R. Zakerzadeh, W. Zhang, and M. S. Sacks. A material modeling approach for the effective response of planar soft tissues for efficient computational simulations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 89:168–198, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant Nos. R01-HL119297 and R01-HL073021 to M.S.S. and J.H.G.; Grant No. K01-HL141643 to A.M.P.), the National Science Foundation (Grant No. DGE-1610403 to B.V.R.), and the American Heart Association (Grant No. 18PRE34030258 to B.V.R.). The authors gratefully acknowledge Samuel T. Potter for his help with spline surface fitting

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Sacks.

Additional information

Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The image-based stretch estimation method employed in the present study has been previously validated for valvular tissues against both in vitro and in vivo fiducial marker-based deformation metrics.21 However, previous validation studies were performed only for the mitral valve, whose geometry is substantially distinct from that of the AV. To further validate our approach for the specific application to the AV, we applied the stretch estimation method to a computationally generated spline surface geometry of a bioprosthetic TAV implant.27,31 While the bioprosthetic AV has an idealized geometry by design, this validation approach had the advantage of allowing for the comparison of our estimated stretch fields to ground-truth local stretch maps for the modeled TAV, which were obtained via isogeometric analysis.31 Resulting stretches from this validation study showed that our technique was able to accurately capture the complex, heterogeneous leaflet deformation field of the AV (Fig. 9). Specifically, our noninvasive method was able to yield stretch estimates within 5% of their ground-truth value over the entire leaflet surface.

Figure 9
figure 9

In-plane stretch in the normal TAV, showing the capability of the method to capture substantial regional heterogeneity as well as directional differences in stretch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rego, B.V., Pouch, A.M., Gorman, J.H. et al. Patient-Specific Quantification of Normal and Bicuspid Aortic Valve Leaflet Deformations from Clinically Derived Images. Ann Biomed Eng 50, 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02882-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02882-0

Keywords

Navigation