Abstract
Cell adhesion to and detachment from the endothelium plays an essential role in numerous biological processes such as cancer cell metastasis, cell migration, and cell–cell communication. However, little is known about the effect of cell shape and orientation on the drag force leading to cell detachment. To further investigate these factors, we cultured cancer cells in a microfluidic channel, and recorded the shape and orientation of the cells under constant fluid flow rate. Results showed that cell morphology varied dynamically with respect to time. In particular, we discovered two distinct shapes of cells at the moment of detachment: the circular shape, and the elongated shape whose long axis is perpendicular to the flow. Based on the experimental observations, we designed and reconstructed two cellular solid models (a hemispherical model and an elongated model) to calculate the drag force using a finite-element method. The hemispherical model yielded much higher pressure drag force than that of the elongated models irrespective of orientation, though the total drag force of the hemispherical model was slightly lower. We also examined the effect of the orientation on the drag force using five different orientations to the flow. The cells of which the long axes were perpendicular to the flow exhibited larger pressure drag force than cells oriented in other directions, though the friction drag force was comparable. In summary, when cells detach from the surface, the fraction of the pressure force becomes larger, demonstrating the determinative role of cell adhesion and/or detachment. Significantly, our observation that two cancer cell subpopulations exist exhibiting different morphological dynamics and required drag forces for detachment implies redundant mechanisms for cancer cells to achieve the transition from the adherent type to the circulating type during metastasis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bengtsson K, Christoffersson J, Mandenius CF, Robinson ND (2018) A clip-on electroosmotic pump for oscillating flow in microfluidic cell culture devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2046-4
Chear CK, Dol SS (2015) Vehicle aerodynamics: drag reduction by surface dimples. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 9:202–205
Cheng X, Irimia D, Dixon M et al (2007) A microfluidic device for practical label-free CD4(+) T cell counting of HIV-infected subjects. Lab Chip 7:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1039/b612966h
Christ KV, Williamson KB, Masters KS, Turner KT (2010) Measurement of single-cell adhesion strength using a microfluidic assay. Biomed Microdevices 12:443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-010-9401-x
Christophis C, Grunze M, Rosenhahn A (2010) Quantification of the adhesion strength of fibroblast cells on ethylene glycol terminated self-assembled monolayers by a microfluidic shear force assay. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:4498. https://doi.org/10.1039/b924304f
Cross SE, Jin Y-S, Tondre J et al (2008) AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells. Nanotechnology 19:384003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/38/384003
Dutta S, Muralidhar K, Panigrahi PK (2003) Influence of the orientation of a square cylinder on the wake properties. Exp Fluids 34:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-002-0484-X
Ernst O, Lieske A, Jäger M et al (2007) Control of cell detachment in a microfluidic device using a thermo-responsive copolymer on a gold substrate. Lab Chip 7:1322. https://doi.org/10.1039/b708619a
Fletcher DA, Mullins RD (2010) Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08908
Green JV, Kniazeva T, Abedi M et al (2009) Effect of channel geometry on cell adhesion in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9:677–685. https://doi.org/10.1039/b813516a
Hang L, Koo LY, Wang WM et al (2004) Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion. Anal Chem 76:5257–5264. https://doi.org/10.1021/AC049837T
Hirohashi S, Kanai Y (2003) Cell adhesion system and human cancer morphogenesis. Cancer Sci 94:575–581
Khalili AA, Ahmad MR (2015) A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int J Mol Sci 16:18149–18184
Koutsiaris AG, Tachmitzi SV, Batis N et al (2007) Volume flow and wall shear stress quantification in the human conjunctival capillaries and post-capillary venules in vivo. Biorheology 44:375–386
Kwon KW, Choi SS, Lee SH et al (2007) Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference. Lab Chip 7:1461. https://doi.org/10.1039/b710054j
Li L, Yang Y, Shi X et al (2014) A microfluidic system for the study of the response of endothelial cells under pressure. Microfluid Nanofluid 16:1089–1096
Maishi N, Hida K (2017) Tumor endothelial cells accelerate tumor metastasis. Cancer Sci 108:1921–1926
McHenry MJ (2003) The hydrodynamics of locomotion at intermediate Reynolds numbers: undulatory swimming in ascidian larvae (Botrylloides sp.). J Exp Biol 206:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00069
Mierke CT (2011) Cancer cells regulate biomechanical properties of human microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 286:40025–40037. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.256172
Plouffe BD, Njoka DN, Harris J et al (2007) Peptide-mediated selective adhesion of smooth muscle and endothelial cells in microfluidic shear flow. Langmuir 23:5050–5055. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0700220
Shao J, Wu L, Wu J et al (2009) Integrated microfluidic chip for endothelial cells culture and analysis exposed to a pulsatile and oscillatory shear stress. Lab Chip 9:3118. https://doi.org/10.1039/b909312e
Siddique A, Meckel T, Stark RW, Narayan S (2017) Improved cell adhesion under shear stress in PDMS microfluidic devices. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 150:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.11.011
Song JW, Cavnar SP, Walker AC et al (2009) Microfluidic endothelium for studying the intravascular adhesion of metastatic breast cancer cells. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005756
Taherzadeh D, Picioreanu C, Küttler U et al (2010) Computational study of the drag and oscillatory movement of biofilm streamers in fast flows. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22551
Vaughan TJ, Haugh MG, McNamara LM (2013) A fluid–structure interaction model to characterize bone cell stimulation in parallel-plate flow chamber systems. J R Soc Interface 10:20120900–20120900. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0900
Wang Y, Dimitrakopoulos P (2006) Nature of the hemodynamic forces exerted on vascular endothelial cells or leukocytes adhering to the surface of blood vessels. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2336116
Young EWK, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA (2007) Matrix-dependent adhesion of vascular and valvular endothelial cells in microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 7:1759. https://doi.org/10.1039/b712486d
Zhang X, Jones P, Haswell SJ (2007) Attachment and detachment of living cells on modified microchannel surfaces in a microfluidic-based lab-on-a-chip system. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.054
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S., Joo, Y.K. & Chen, Y. Dynamic adhesion characterization of cancer cells under blood flow-mimetic conditions: effects of cell shape and orientation on drag force. Microfluid Nanofluid 22, 108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2132-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2132-7