Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of volume-based fluid balance monitoring in operative hysteroscopy. The actual volume of twenty 3-litre Glycine 1.5 % bags was measured by weighing the contents of each bag and by converting the weight into volume knowing the specific gravity of Glycine 1.5 %. The volume of the SerresOY suction canisters that represents the output volume was measured using a calibrated 1000-ml beaker. The volume in the 3-litre Glycine 1.5 % bags ranged from a minimum 3105 ml to a maximum of 3124 ml with a mean volume of 3115.3 ml. The actual volume of fluid in the SerresOY suction canisters containing the plastic liner when the reading is 500 ml was 425 ml, at 1000 ml, it was 900 ml, and at 2000 ml, it was 1850 ml. Therefore, a measured 3-litre outflow would have an actual volume of 2750 ml. It is concluded that volume-based fluid monitoring is not a reliable method in operative hysteroscopy. Therefore, weight-based fluid management systems should be used to ensure patient safety and prevent fluid overload.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, Kurek R, Meyer A, Wallwiener D (2002) A multicentre survey of complications associated with 21,676 operative hysteroscopies, European journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Biol 104:160–164
Garry R, Hasham F, Kokri MS, Mooney P (1992) The effect of pressure on fluid absorption during endometrial ablation. J Gynecol Surg 8:1–10
Hahn RG (2006) Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth 96:8–20
Emanuel MH, Hart A, Wamsteker K, Lammes F (1997) An analysis of fluid loss during transcervical resection of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 68:881–886
Baxter Healthcare Limited, Certificate of analysis: 1.5 % Glycine for irrigation 3000mls, 2014
Hahn RG, Sandfeltd L (1999) Blood ammonia levels after intravenous infusion of glycine with and without ethanol. Scand J Urol Nephrol 333:222–227
Ayus JC, Arieff AI (1997) Glycine-induced hypo-osmolar hyponatremia. Arch Intern Med 157:223–226
Nezhat CH, Fisher DT, Datta S (2007) Investigation of often-reported ten percent hysteroscopy fluid overfill: is this accurate? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:489–493
Tomazevic T, Savnik L, Dintinjana M, et al. (1998) Safe and effective fluid management by automated gravitation during hysteroscopy. JSLS 2(1):51–55
Hawe JA, Chien PFW, Martin D, Phillips AG, Garry R (1998) The validity of continuous fluid monitoring during endometrial surgery: luxury or necessity? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(7):797–801
AAGL, AAGL Practice Report: Practical Guidelines for the Management of Hysteroscopic Distending Media, 2013, 20; 2:137–148
Indman PD, Brooks PG, Cooper JM, Loffer FD, Valle RF, Vancaillie TG (1998) Complications of fluid overload from resectoscopic surgery. AAGL 5:63–67
Istre O, Skajaa K, Schjoensby A, et al. (1992) Changes in serum electrolytes after transcervical resection of endometrium and submucous fibroids with use of glycine 1.5 % for uterine irrigation. Obstet Gynaecol 80(2):218–222
Mangos A, Baumann R, Turnbull A (1990) Safety of transcervical endometrial resection. Lancet 6:44
Baumann R, Magos A, Kay JDS, Turnbull A (1990) Absorption of glycine irrigating solution during transcervical resection of endometrium. Br Med J 300:305–305
Istre O, Bjoennes J, Naess R, et al. (1994) Postoperative cerebral oedema after transcervical endometrial resection and uterine irrigation with 1.5 % glycine. Lancet 344:1187–1189
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the gynaecology theatre staff for their help and support during the conduction of the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
No funding was required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nikolopoulos, I., Phillips, G. Reliability of fluid monitoring during operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 13, 23–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0922-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0922-4