Skip to main content
Log in

Age-related etiologies of aortic regurgitation with moderate or greater severity and coronary cusp bending: evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography

  • Original Article–Cardiology
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The prevalence of valvular heart disease has been rising, especially among those ≥ 65 years of age, because of age-related valvular degeneration resulting in an increase in the number of patients diagnosed with aortic regurgitation (AR). We analyzed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images in AR patients to identify the etiologies and investigate any differences in them according to age.

Methods

We studied 146 consecutive patients with chronic moderate or severe AR who underwent TEE. AR etiology was evaluated based on the TEE images in all the patients, as well as in each group separated by age.

Results

The total number of patients eligible was 126 (mean age 67 ± 12 years), consisting of an older group (n = 85, mean age 74 ± 5 years) and younger group (n = 41, mean age 52 ± 11 years). In total, the most common etiology of AR was cusp bending (33.0%). In the older group, it was the most frequent as well (48.2%), with the right coronary cusp being the most commonly affected site (90.2%). In the younger group, bicuspid aortic valve was the most common (36.5%). Subsequently, all the study subjects were re-classified into two groups according to the presence/absence of cusp bending. Multivariate analysis revealed that age was the only factor associated with cusp bending.

Conclusion

Cusp bending was the most frequent etiology of AR in the elderly. Preoperative detection of cusp bending by TEE would expand the therapeutic strategy for AR, including aortic valvuloplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of acquired valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:962–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollenberg SM. Valvular heart disease in adults: etiologies, classification, and diagnosis. FP Essent. 2017;457:11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts WC, Ko JM, Moore TR, et al. Causes of pure aortic regurgitation in patients having isolated aortic valve replacement at a single US tertiary hospital (1993 to 2005). Circulation. 2006;114:422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;21:2739–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun J, Krüger K, Manger B, et al. Cardiovascular comorbidity in inflammatory rheumatological conditions. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;24:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rimmer L, Ahmad MU, Chaplin G, et al. Aortic valve repair: where are we now? Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28:988–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunihara T. Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment. J Med Ultrason. 2019;46:51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Watremez C, et al. Assessment and repair of aortic valve cusp prolapse: implications for valve-sparing procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:917–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shibayama K, Watanabe H, Murai T, et al. Aortic regurgitation caused by cusp bending of aortic valve leaflet. J Echocardiogr. 2012;10:21–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soga F, Takaya T, Mori S, et al. Bending of the aortic valvar leaflet causing severe aortic regurgitation in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khoury G, Glineur D, Rubay J, et al. Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005;20:115–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de le Waroux JBP, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, et al. Functional anatomy of aortic regurgitation: accuracy, prediction of surgical repairability, and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 2007;116:I264–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Costantino S, Paneni F, Cosentino F. Ageing, metabolism and cardiovascular disease. J Physiol. 2016;15:2061–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen WM, Matloff JM, Fishbein MC. Myxoid degeneration of the aortic valve and isolated severe aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:439–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silver MA, Roberts WC. Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic valve in hearts of normal and increased weight. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:454–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tonnemacher D, Reid C, Kawanishi D, et al. Frequency of myxomatous degeneration of the aortic valve as a cause of isolated aortic regurgitation severe enough to warrant aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:1194–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akiyama K, Hirota J, Taniyasu N, et al. Pathogenetic significance of myxomatous degeneration in fenestration-related massive aortic regurgitation. Circ J. 2004;68:439–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Irisawa Y, Itatani K, Kitamura T, et al. Aortic regurgitation due to fibrous strand rupture in the fenestrated left coronary cusp of the tricuspid aortic valve. Int Heart J. 2014;55:550–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, et al. Aortic root numeric model: correlation between intraoperative effective height and diastolic coaptation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:303–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, et al. Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1227–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Yamada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the current retrospective evaluation of clinically acquired data and waived the need for patient written informed consent. The study conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoshino, N., Yamada, A., Kawada, Y. et al. Age-related etiologies of aortic regurgitation with moderate or greater severity and coronary cusp bending: evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography. J Med Ultrasonics 49, 231–239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01177-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01177-0

Keywords

Navigation