Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography

  • Special Feature: Review Article
  • Role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging and should be achieved through the comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological evidence, as there is currently no single reliable diagnostic modality. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can reveal pancreatic parenchymal and ductal features in much more detail than any other existing imaging modality. In this article, we focused on three applications of EUS, i.e., conventional EUS imaging, EUS elastography (EUS-EG), and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS), for the diagnosis of AIP. Diffuse hypoechoic areas, diffuse enlargement, bile duct wall thickening, and peripancreatic hypoechoic margins on conventional EUS are characteristic features of AIP, and the frequencies of these findings are significantly higher in AIP than in pancreatic cancer (PC). EUS-EG of the pancreatic parenchyma in AIP showed homogenous stiffness and that the elasticity of the pancreas may change after steroid therapy. CEH-EUS revealed focal or diffuse iso-enhancement in most AIP cases and hypo-enhancement in most PC cases. However, some AIP cases show a contrast enhancement pattern similar to that of PC. It should be noted that EUS findings of AIP may differ depending on its stage or disease activity. Differentiation from PC has become an increasingly important issue in the process of diagnosing AIP, and EUS, including elastography and contrast enhancement, could be a promising imaging modality for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshida K, Toki F, Takeuchi T, Watanabe S, Shiratori K, Hayashi N. Chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune abnormality. Proposal of the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1561–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham SC, Wilentz RE, Yeo CJ, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resections) in patients without malignancy: are they all “chronic pancreatitis”? Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:110–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Castro SM, de Nes LC, Nio CY, et al. Incidence and characteristics of chronic and lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis in patients scheduled to undergo a pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de la Fuente SG, Ceppa EP, Reddy SK, Clary BM, Tyler DS, Pappas TN. Incidence of benign disease in patients that underwent resection for presumed pancreatic cancer diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1139–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith CD, Behrns KE, van Heerden JA, Sarr MG. Radical pancreatoduodenectomy for misdiagnosed pancreatic mass. Br J Surg. 1994;81:585–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Heerde MJ, Biermann K, Zondervan PE, et al. Prevalence of autoimmune pancreatitis and other benign disorders in pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy of the pancreatic head. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2458–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawa S, Kamisawa T, Notohara K, et al. Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2018: revision of Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2011. Pancreas. 2020;49:e13–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sivak MV, Kaufman A. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease. A preliminary report. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1986;123:130–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yasuda K, Mukai H, Fujimoto S, Nakajima M, Kawai K. The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima F, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:797-804 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morishima T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Prospective multicenter study on the usefulness of EUS-guided FNA biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adler DG, Muthusamy VR, Ehrlich DS, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: experience in 200 patients. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019;8:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: initial assessment. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:338–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mukai S, Itoi T, Yamaguchi H, et al. A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel franseen needle and a conventional end-cut type needle. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019;8:50–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Clinical impact of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy using a novel Franseen needle for histological assessment of pancreatic diseases. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:8581743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurita A, Yasukawa S, Zen Y, et al. Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a prospective randomized, controlled multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using a 22-gauge Franseen needle: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2020;52:978–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yarandi SS, Runge T, Wang L, et al. Increased incidence of benign pancreatic pathology following pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy over 10 years despite increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2014;2014:701535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A, Pross M, Schulz HU, Malfertheiner P. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:507–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L, et al. Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:18–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace MB, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2001;23:26–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito T, Nakano I, Koyanagi S, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis as a new clinical entity Three cases of autoimmune pancreatitis with effective steroid therapy. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42(1458):68.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hyodo N, Hyodo T. Ultrasonographic evaluation in patients with autoimmune-related pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrell JJ, Garber J, Sahani D, Brugge WR. EUS findings in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:927–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoki N, Mizuno N, Sawaki A, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:154–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Kaji R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic study of autoimmune pancreatitis and the effect of steroid therapy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kubota K, Kato S, Akiyama T, et al. A proposal for differentiation between early- and advanced-stage autoimmune pancreatitis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarner M, Cotton PB. Classification of pancreatitis. Gut. 1984;25:756–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Peripancreatic vascular involvements of autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1790–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamano H, Kawa S, Horiuchi A, et al. High serum IgG4 concentrations in patients with sclerosing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:732–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamisawa T, Takuma K, Tabata T, et al. Serum IgG4-negative autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:108–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paik WH, Ryu JK, Park JM, et al. Clinical and pathological differences between serum immunoglobulin G4-positive and -negative type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4031–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hirooka Y, Kuwahara T, Irisawa A, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: pancreas. J Med Ultrason. 2015;42:151–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiina T. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:309–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shiina T, Nitta N, Ueno E, Bamber JC. Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method. J Med Ultrason. 2002;29:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yada N, Sakurai T, Minami T, et al. A newly developed shear wave elastography modality: with a unique reliability index. Oncology. 2015;89:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:344–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chantarojanasiri T, Kongkam P. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for solid pancreatic lesions. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:506–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ohno E, Kawashima H, Hashimoto S, Goto H, Hirooka Y. Current status of tissue harmonic imaging in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-elastography in pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:68–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Feasibility and usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided shear-wave measurement for assessment of autoimmune pancreatitis activity: a prospective exploratory study. J Med Ultrason. 2019;46:425–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott M, Ignee A. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2009;41:718–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound elastography combined with the strain ratio in the estimation of treatment effect in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2020;49:e21–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni A, et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:843–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Iglesias-Garcia J, Lindkvist B, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader-Nallib I, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: contrast-enhanced harmonic (CEH-EUS), quantitative-elastography (QE-EUS), or both? United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:236–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Usefulness of shear wave elastography as a quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:756–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic tumor fibrosis using shear wave elastography. Pancreatology. 2016;16:1063–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ohno E, Kawashima H, Ishikawa T, et al. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided elastography for solid pancreatic lesions: shear-wave measurements versus strain elastography with histogram analysis. Dig Endosc. 2021;33:629–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kitano M, Kamata K, Imai H, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(Suppl 1):60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Ito A, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases: a preliminary study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:632–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic disorders using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:S63–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in digestive diseases. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1063–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:951–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Matsubara H, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Dynamic quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Pancreas. 2011;40:1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors by endoscopic ultrasound findings of mural nodules. Ann Surg. 2009;249:628–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ohno E, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Malignant transformation of branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas based on contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography morphological changes: focus on malignant transformation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm itself. Pancreas. 2012;41:855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011;43:163–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of autoimmune pancreatitis: comparison with pathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Dong Y, D’Onofrio M, Hocke M, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis: imaging features. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cho MK, Moon SH, Song TJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for differentially diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gut Liver. 2018;12:591–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Imazu H, Kanazawa K, Mori N, et al. Novel quantitative perfusion analysis with contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:853–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ishikawa T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Multiphase evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. Pancreatology. 2018;18:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Ishikawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent for inclusion in the study was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishikawa, T., Kawashima, H., Ohno, E. et al. Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Med Ultrasonics 48, 543–553 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01143-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01143-w

Keywords

Navigation