Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to determine the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Methods

CEUS images of 93 patients were evaluated to observe new vessels within CAPs. Microembolic signals (MES) were detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD). Thirty-four patients with hyperechoic plaques were evaluated as the control group.

Results

Eighty percent (75/93) of plaques showed contrast enhancement on CEUS, including 50.7 % (38/75) of hypoechoic plaques and 49.3 % (37/75) of mixed echoic plaques. No plaques in the control group showed enhancement on CEUS. With TCD, 35.5 % (33/93) of patients were positive for MES. Plaques with grade 2 or 3 enhancement on CEUS had a higher positive rate for MES. Forty-one patients with grade 2 or 3 enhancement on CEUS presented with fresh infarctions confirmed by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Conclusions

In conclusion, grade 2 or 3 contrast enhancement observed on CEUS indicated vulnerable plaques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fayad ZA, Fuster V. Clinical imaging of the high-risk or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Circ Res. 2001;89:305–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramer CM. Magnetic resonance imaging to identify the high-risk plaque. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:L15–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadat U, Weerakkody RA, Bowden DJ, et al. Utility of high resolution MR imaging to assess carotid plaque morphology: a comparison of acute symptomatic, recently symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:434–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perrone-Filardi P, Dellegrottaglie S, Rudd JH, et al. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis in translational medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:969–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aldemir E, Apaydin M, Varer M, et al. Echolucency of carotid plaques and cerebrovascular events. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:399–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeziorska M, Woolley DE. Local neovascularization and cellular composition within vulnerable regions of atherosclerotic plaques of human carotid arteries. J Pathol. 1999;188:189–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feinstein SB. Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med. 2007;12:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Granada JF, Feinstein SB. Imaging of the vasa vasorum. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:S18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Staub D, Partovi S, Imfeld S, et al. Novel applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. Vasa. 2013;42:17–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zwiebel WJ, Pellerito JS. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2004. (Translated by Chao-Yang Wen. Beijing: People’s Military Medical Press, 2008).

  13. Coli S, Magnoni M, Sangiorgi G, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:223–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. Basic identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke. 1995;26:1123.

  15. Faggioli GL, Pini R, Mauro R, et al. Identification of carotid ‘vulnerable plaque’ by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: correlation with plaque histology, symptoms and cerebral computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:238–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giannoni MF, Vicenzini E, Citone M, et al. Contrast carotid ultrasound for the detection of unstable plaques with neoangiogenesis: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:722–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Staub D, Patel MB, Tibrewala A, et al. Vasa vasorum and plaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound imaging correlates with cardiovascular disease and past cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2010;41:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Owen DR, Lindsay AC, Choudhury RP, et al. Imaging of atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:25–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajaram V, Pandhya S, Patel S, et al. Role of surrogate markers in assessing patients with diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome and in evaluating lipid-lowering therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:32–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clevert DA, Sommer WH, Helck A, et al. Improved carotid atherosclerotic plaques imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48:141–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Zuilen EV, Van Gijn J, Ackerstaff RG. The clinical relevance of cerebral microemboli detection by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Neuroimaging. 1998;8:32–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheung RT. Early ischemic recurrence and microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 1999;30:1290–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feinstein SB. Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Contract grant sponsor: Science and Technology Development Projects of Jilin Province (major project) (contract grant number: 20110485) and Health Department Projects of Jilin Province (contract grant number: 2011Z065).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Feng Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.

Ethical considerations

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. The study protocol was approved by our hospital ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to the ultrasound examination.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, XF., Wang, J., Wu, XL. et al. Evaluation of the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Med Ultrasonics 43, 71–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0647-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0647-z

Keywords

Navigation