Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of MRI on the post-therapeutic diagnosis of T4 esophageal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Opportunities for T4b esophageal cancer patients to receive curative surgery are increasing with the development of multidisciplinary treatments. However, the best modality to accurately diagnose infiltration to the organs surrounding T4b esophageal cancer is still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of CT and MRI in diagnosing T stage in T4b esophageal cancer, with reference to the pathological diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective medical records review of patients with T4b esophageal cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2021 was conducted. Among 125 patients who were treated for cT4b esophageal cancer in Osaka University Hospital, 30 patients were diagnosed with cT4b esophageal cancer by CT, ycT staging with CT (contrast-enhanced images) and MRI (T2-FSE images), and curative R0 resection was performed. Preoperative MRI staging was independently performed by two experienced radiologists. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI were examined using McNemar’s test.

Results

Nineteen and 12 patients were diagnosed with ycT4b by CT and MRI, respectively. Combined T4b organ resection was performed in 15 patients. A pathological diagnosis of ypT4b was made in 11 cases. In comparison to CT, MRI showed a higher diagnostic performance, specificity (47% vs. 89%, p = 0.013), and accuracy (60% vs. 90%, p = 0.015) for CT vs. MRI.

Conclusions

Our results—with reference to the pathological diagnosis—revealed that MRI had a superior diagnostic performance to CT for diagnosing T4b esophageal cancer invading the surrounding organs. An accurate diagnosis of T4b esophageal cancer may facilitate the implementation of appropriate treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available from the authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. Society JE. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-016-0551-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohtsu A, Boku N, Muro K, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2915–2915. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17(7):855–83. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugimura K, Miyata H, Tanaka K, et al. Multicenter randomized phase 2 trial comparing chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy as initial induction therapy for subsequent conversion surgery in patients with clinical T4b esophageal cancer: short-term results. Ann Surg. 2021;274(6):e465–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyata H, Sugimura K, Motoori M, et al. Clinical implications of conversion surgery after induction therapy for T4b thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(13):4737–43. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07727-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong SJ, Kim TJ, Nam KB, et al. New TNM staging system for esophageal cancer: what chest radiologists need to know. Radiographics. 2014;34(6):1722–40. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.346130079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim TJ, Kim HY, Lee KW, et al. Multimodality assessment of esophageal cancer: preoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):403–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo L-N, He L-J, Gao X-Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pech O, Günter E, Dusemund F, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: results from a referral center for early esophageal cancer. Endoscopy. 2010;42(06):456–61. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel Picus DMB, Koehler RE, Roper CL, Owen JW. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology. 1983;146:433–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, et al. Clinical TNM staging for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5(4):404–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Z, Xie DH, Guo L, et al. The utility of MRI for pre-operative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1050):20140552. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Moritani K, Kanemitsu Y, Shida D, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing primary tumour resection plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: JCOG1007 (iPACS study). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyz173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Rossum PSN, van Hillegersberg R, Lever FM, et al. Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what’s the role of MRI? Eur Radiol. 2013;23(7):1753–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2773-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu LF, Wang BZ, Feng JL, et al. Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(2):219–24. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i2.219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Z, Guo J, Qin J, et al. Accuracy of 3-T MRI for preoperative T staging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):788–95. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo J, Wang Z, Qin J, et al. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00343-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Riddell AM, Allum WH, Thompson JN, et al. The appearances of oesophageal carcinoma demonstrated on high-resolution, T2-weighted MRI, with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(2):391–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0363-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamasaki M, Yamashita K, Saito T, et al. Tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. Dis Esophagus. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doz101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Kurokawa Y, et al. Clinical relevance of induction triplet chemotherapy for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(4):441–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Tanaka K, et al. Multicenter phase I/II study of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Oncology. 2011;80(5–6):307–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamasaki M, Yasuda T, Yano M, et al. Multicenter randomized phase II study of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus adriamycin (ACF) as preoperative chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OGSG1003). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(1):116–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khashper A, Addley HC, Abourokbah N, et al. T2-hypointense adnexal lesions: an imaging algorithm. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1047–64. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.324115180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegelman ES, Outwater EK. Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;212(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakurada A, Takahara T, Kwee TC, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in esophageal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(6):1461–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1291-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garrido T, Maluf-Filho F, Sallum RA, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound application for diagnosis of tracheobronchial tree invasion by esophageal cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(6):499–504. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322009000600003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishino T, Toba H, Yoshida T, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound improves the diagnosis of the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6398–406. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09912-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kimiaki Kida, radiology technician, Saito Yukokai Hospital, for their support in establishing the MRI imaging system used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Yamasaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harino, T., Yamasaki, M., Murai, S. et al. Impact of MRI on the post-therapeutic diagnosis of T4 esophageal cancer. Esophagus 20, 740–748 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01010-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01010-2

Keywords

Navigation