Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current status of radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in Japan, based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan from 2009 to 2011 by the Japan Esophageal Society

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although esophagectomy is the standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone is also selected for some cases. However, there have been very few detailed studies conducted on a large scale on the efficacy of these treatments in Japan.

Methods

Of the patients enrolled in the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan by the Japan Esophageal Society for the 2015–2017 surveys (patients treated between 2009 and 2011), the data of 388 patients treated by definitive radiotherapy alone (RTx) and 1964 patients treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) were analyzed.

Results

The median age of the patients was 78 years in the RTx group and 69 years in the CRTx group; thus, the proportion of elderly patients was significantly higher in the RTx group than in the CRTx group (p < 0.0001). With regard to the rates of treatment by the two modalities according to the depth of invasion, extent of lymph node metastasis, and disease stage, the treatment rate by CRTx increased more significantly than that by RTx as the disease progressed (p < 0.0001). With regard to the distribution of the total irradiation dose, 11.4% and 2.3% of patients in the RTx and CRTx groups, respectively, received a dose of 67 Gy or more; thus, the RTx group received significantly higher total irradiation doses (p < 0.0001). In the RTx group, the 5-year overall survival rate was 23.2%, and the rates in patients with cStage 0–I, II, III, and IV disease were 41.8%,18.5%, 9.3%, and 13.9%, respectively. In the patients of the RTx group showing complete response (CR), the 5-year overall survival rate was 46.6% and the rates in patients with cStage 0–I, II, III, and IV disease were 54.8%, 39.6%, 32.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. In the CRTx group, the 5-year overall survival rate was 30.6% and the rates in patients with cStage 0–I, II, III, and IV disease were 57.8%, 47.8%, 23.4%, and 13.0%, respectively. In the patients of the CRTx group showing CR, the 5-year overall survival rate was 59.2% and the rates in patients with cStage 0–I, II, III, and IV disease were 67.9%, 59.5%, 56.5%, and 39.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

This study revealed the current status of treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan, and we think that we have been able to establish the grounds for explaining to patients with esophageal cancer and their families the treatment decisions made for them in daily clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16:25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H, et al. A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:638–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:684–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasaki Y, Kato K. Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:805–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawashima M, Kagami Y, Toita T, et al. Prospective trial of radiotherapy for patients 80 years of age or older with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1112–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishimura Y, Jingu K, Itasaka S, et al. Clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2008: the second survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG). Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2009. Esophagus. 2016;13:110–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2010. Esophagus. 2017;14:189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2011. Esophagus. 2018;15:127–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jingu K, Matsushita H, Takeda K, et al. Results of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal cancer in medically inoperable patients compared with results in operable patients. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:522–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nemoto K, Matsumoto Y, Yamakawa M, et al. Treatment of superficial esophageal cancer by external radiation therapy alone: results of a multi-institutional experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46:921–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishimura Y, Ono K, Tsutsui K, et al. Esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: impact of total treatment time and fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30:1099–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao KL, Shi XH, Jiang GL, Wang Y. Late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for localized esophageal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verma V, Lin SH, Simone CB 2nd, Mehta MP. Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7:644–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Okada T, Kamada T, Tsuji H, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy: clinical experiences at National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS). J Radiat Res. 2010;51:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Warren S, Hurt CN, Crosby T, et al. Potential of proton therapy to reduce acute hematologic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99:729–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the institutions which cooperated to the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan by the Japan Esophageal Society for the 2015–2017 surveys for their contributions.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Planning of the study and writing: Y.To, T.U., K.J., K.N. Data analysis: Y.To, H.N. Discussion and advices: Y.Ta, H.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasushi Toh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toh, Y., Numasaki, H., Tachimori, Y. et al. Current status of radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in Japan, based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan from 2009 to 2011 by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 17, 25–32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-019-00690-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-019-00690-z

Keywords

Navigation