Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is one of the major complications that can occur after an esophagectomy. We report on the advantages of a computer-controlled portable vacuum pump system, Thopaz®, for intraluminal continuous decompression and drainage in the non-surgical management of cervical anastomotic leakage. Continuous decompression with negative pressure of 20 cm H2O was set at the anastomotic leakage point by a naso-gastric tube or a trans-gastric decompression tube. The drainage effect was confirmed by swallowing contrast media under fluoroscopy. Three successive cases with postoperative anastomotic leakage received this treatment. The treatments were successful without complication and the leakages were healed 7, 15, and 17 days after the treatments, respectively. The management of anastomotic leakage using the portable pump system was beneficial in bringing about a prompt healing with minimum intervention. To further demonstrate the advantage of this procedure over conventional treatments, a larger data set and clinical trials are required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, et al. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1919–26.
Yin G, Xu Q, Chen S, et al. Fluoroscopically guided three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13:182–8.
Liu YN, Yan Y, Li SJ, et al. Reliable management of post-esophagectomy anastomotic fistula with endoscopic trans-fistula negative pressure drainage. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:240–6.
Brangewitz M, Voigtländer T, Helfritz FA, et al. Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:433–8.
Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A. Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;20:413–20.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.
Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. Pattern of postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer resection according to center volume: Results from a large European multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4310-5 (published online).
Okada T, Kawada K, Nakajima Y, et al. Internal pressure of the conduit during endoscopy on the day after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2013;30:183–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shichinohe, T., Ebihara, Y., Murakami, S. et al. Intraluminal continuous decompression and drainage using a vacuum pump for controlling cervical anastomotic leakage after a three-field esophagectomy with a gastric pull-up. Esophagus 13, 229–233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-015-0505-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-015-0505-5