Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The current status of surgical pilonidal sinus disease therapy in Germany

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose

Treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) requires a tailored approach. A national guideline was published in 2014. The current status of surgical PSD therapy in Germany is unknown. The present study aims at evaluating treatment strategies currently used for PSD in Germany. Additionally, changes in surgical practice over the past 20 years were reviewed.

Methods

A total of 1191 German hospitals treating patients with PSD were surveyed between September 2015 and September 2016 to identify treatment strategies used for asymptomatic, acute, and chronic PSD. Answers could be provided electronically or by mail. Analysis was performed following irreversible anonymization of the dataset.

Results

The return rate of the survey was 38%, with 454 of 1191 hospitals responding. Asymptomatic PSD was treated conservatively by a majority (52%) of participating institutions. Acute PSD was incised, and secondary definitive treatment followed in 42%. Chronic PSD was approached by primary excision and open wound healing in 60% of hospitals, with 33% using a flap technique and 15% an off-midline procedure to close the defect. Over the past 20 years, use of flap procedures and off-midline techniques has increased by 37% and 35%, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study reveals that primary excision and open wound healing is still preferred in Germany, in spite of the availability of better options. While the use of flap procedures and off-midline techniques has increased over the past decades, these minimally invasive approaches remained underused, and compliance with the 2014 national guidelines for treatment of PSD remains poor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayo H. Observations on injuries and diseases of the rectum. London: Burgess & Hill; 1833.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, et al. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10:39–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bundesregierung. 2014. http://www.gbe-bund.de/oowa921-install/servlet/oowa/aw92/dboowasys921.xwdevkit/xwd_init?gbe.isgbetol/xs_start_neu/&p_aid=i&p_aid=90682233&nummer=550&p_sprache=D&p_indsp=-&p_aid=9880488.

  4. Doll D, Orlik A, Maier K, et al. Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Evers T, Doll D, Matevossian E, et al. Trends in incidence and long-term recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus disease and analysis of associated influencing factors. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011;49:799–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017;40:434–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1146–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chijiwa T, Suganuma T, Takigawa T, et al. Pilonidal sinus in Japan maritime self-defense force at Yokosuka. Mil Med. 2006;171:650–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HC, Ho YH, Seow CF, et al. Pilonidal disease in Singapore: clinical features and management. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70:196–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ardelt M, Dennler U, Fahrner R, et al. Puberty is a major factor in pilonidal sinus disease: gender-specific investigations of case number development in Germany from 2007 until 2015. Chirurg. 2017;88:961–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doll D, Friederichs J, Dettmann H, et al. Time and rate of sinus formation in pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:359–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery. 1980;87:567–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doll D, Matevossian E, Wietelmann K, et al. Family history of pilonidal sinus predisposes to earlier onset of disease and a 50 % long-term recurrence rate. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1610–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patey DH. A reappraisal of the acquired theory of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus and an assessment of its influence on surgical practice. Br J Surg. 1969;56:463–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stelzner F. Die Ursache des Pilonidalsinus und der Pyodermia fistulans sinifica. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1984;362:105–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Doll D, Bosche FD, Stauffer VK, et al. Strength of occipital hair as an explanation for pilonidal sinus disease caused by intruding hair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:979–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Doll D, Bosche FD, Hauser A, et al. The presence of occipital hair in the pilonidal sinus cavity‑a triple approach to proof. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:567–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bosche F, Luedi MM, van der Zypen D, et al. The hair in the sinus: sharp-ended rootless head hair fragments can be found in large amounts in pilonidal sinus nests. World J Surg. 2018;42:567–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahl HD, Henrich MH. Light and scanning electron microscopy study of the pathogenesis of pilonidal sinus and anal fistula. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1992;377:118–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, et al. Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:339–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akinci OF, Kurt M, Terzi A, et al. Natal cleft deeper in patients with pilonidal sinus: implications for choice of surgical procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1000–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doll D, Luedi MM, Wieferich K, et al. Stop insulting the patient: neither incidence nor recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease is linked to personal hygiene. Pilonidal Sinus J. 2015;1:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sievert H, Evers T, Matevossian E, et al. The influence of lifestyle (smoking and body mass index) on wound healing and long-term recurrence rate in 534 primary pilonidal sinus patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1555–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balik O, Balik AA, Polat KY, et al. The importance of local subcutaneous fat thickness in pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1755–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ommer A, et al. S3-Leitlinie Sinus pilonidalis. 2020. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/081-009l_S3_Sinus_pilonidalis_2020-07.PSDf.

  26. Doll D, Friederichs J, Dusel W, et al. Surgery for asymptomatic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:839–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen SL, Harling H. Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg. 1988;75:60–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3058.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Doll D, Matevossian E, Hoenemann C, et al. Incision and drainage preceding definite surgery achieves lower 20-year long-term recurrence rate in 583 primary pilonidal sinus surgery patients. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013;11:60–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hussain ZI, Aghahoseini A, Alexander D. Converting emergency pilonidal abscess into an elective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:640–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus disease. J Visc Surg. 2013;150:237–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fahrni GT, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Leu S, et al. Five-year follow-up and recurrence rates following surgery for acute and chronic pilonidal disease: a survey of 421 cases. Wounds. 2016;28:20–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ommer A, Berg E, Breitkopf C, et al. S3-Leitlinie: Sinus pilonidalis. coloproctology. 2014;36:272–322.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Deutsches Krankenhausverzeichnis. 2015. www.deutsches-krankenhaus-verzeichnis.de.

  35. Lamdark T, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN, Bielicki IN, et al. Treatment strategies for Pilonidal sinus disease in Switzerland and Austria. Medicina. 2020;56:341.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Iesalnieks I, Fuerst A, Rentsch M, et al. Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate. Chirurg. 2003;74:461–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Doll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, et al. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pilonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1928–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Doll D, Matevossian E, Luedi MM, et al. Does full wound rupture following median Pilonidal closure Alter long-term recurrence rate? Med Princ Pract. 2015;24:571–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, et al. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1458–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Evers T, Doll D. Pilonidalsinus: Hohe chirurgische Rezidivrate. AmbChir. 2009;6:25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, et al. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Allen-Mersh TG. Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg. 1990;77:123–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kronborg O, Christensen K, Zimmermann-Nielsen C. Chronic pilonidal disease: a randomized trial with a complete 3‑year follow-up. Br J Surg. 1985;72:p303–p4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Hassan HKF, Francis IM, Neglén P. Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus. Acta Chir Scand. 1990;156:695–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:863–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Petersen S. Exzision und Marsupialisation im Vergleich zu Rhomboidexzision mit Limberg-Plastik beim Sinus pilonidalis. coloproctology. 2010;32:189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cihan A, Mentes BB, Tatlicioglu E, et al. Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:238–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Urhan MK, Kücükel F, Topgul K, et al. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:656–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Topgül K, Ozdemir E, Kilic K, et al. Long-term results of limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus: a report of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1545–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, et al. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol. 2002;6:27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaya B, Eris C, Atalay S, et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:55–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:491–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Petersen S, Aumann G, Kramer A. Short-term results of Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11:235–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Guner A, Cekic AB. Pilonidal sinus—challenges and solutions. Open Access Surg. 2015;8:67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ersoy OF, Karaca S, Kayaoglu HA, et al. Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007;23:67–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Muzi MG, Milito G, Cadeddu F, et al. Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200:9–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Doll D, Luedi MM, Evers T, et al. Recurrence-free survival, but not surgical therapy per se, determines 583 patients’ long-term satisfaction following primary pilonidal sinus surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:605–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Karakayali F, Karagulle E, Karabulut Z, et al. Unroofing and marsupialization vs. rhomboid excision and Limberg flap in pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:496–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:415–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kepenekci I, Demirkan A, Celasin H, et al. Unroofing and curettage for the treatment of acute and chronic pilonidal disease. World J Surg. 2010;34:153–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V‑Y flap for pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1436–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Luedi MM, Kauf P, Mulks L, et al. Implications of patient Age and ASA physical status for operating room management decisions. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1169–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Luedi MM, Kauf P, Evers T, et al. Impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and long term recurrence after surgery for pilonidal disease. J Clin Anesth. 2016;33:236–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fabricius R, Petersen LW, Bertelsen CA. Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal. Dan Med Bull. 2010;57:A4200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Doll D, Friederichs J, Boulexteix AL, et al. Surgery for asymptomatic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:839–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Karip AB, Celik K, Aydin T, et al. Effect of triclosan-coated suture and antibiotic prophylaxis on infection and recurrence after Karydakis flap repair for pilonidal disease: a randomized parallel-arm double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Infect. 2016;17:583–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Popeskou S, Christoforidis D, Ruffieux C, et al. Wound infection after excision and primary midline closure for pilonidal disease: risk factor analysis to improve patient selection. World J Surg. 2011;35:206–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kundes MF, Cetin K, Kement M, et al. Does prophylactic antibiotic reduce surgical site infections after rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for pilonidal disease: a prospective randomized double blind study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1089–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Petersen S, Wietelmann K, Evers T, et al. Long-term effects of postoperative razor epilation in pilonidal sinus disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:131–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Doll D, Novtny A, Wietelmann K, et al. Factors influencing surgical decisions in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Eur Surg. 2009;41:60–5.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cubukcu A, Gönüllü NN, Paksoy M, et al. The role of obesity on the recurrence of pilonidal sinus disease in patients, who were treated by excision and Limberg flap transposition. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:173–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jeannie Wurz, Medical Editor at the Bern University Hospital, for careful reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgie und Enddarmpraxis Duesseldorf, Rheinbabenstraße 5, 40476, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Ralph Schneider MD

  2. Vechtaer Institut für Forschungsförderung VIFF, 49377, Vechta, Germany

    Marius Dettmer, Nora Peters & Dietrich Doll

  3. Department of Surgery, Clinic of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Tenzin Lamdark & Michel Adamina

  4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital Bern, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Markus M. Luedi

  5. Department of Procto-Surgery, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Vechta, Teaching Hospital of the Hannover University, 49377, Vechta, Germany

    Dietrich Doll

Authors
  1. Ralph Schneider MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marius Dettmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nora Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tenzin Lamdark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus M. Luedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michel Adamina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dietrich Doll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Schneider MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

R. Schneider, M. Dettmer, N. Peters, T. Lamdark, M. M. Luedi, M. Adamina, and D. Doll declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, R., Dettmer, M., Peters, N. et al. The current status of surgical pilonidal sinus disease therapy in Germany. Eur Surg 54, 117–125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00715-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00715-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation