Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic appendectomy using only two 5 mm trocars

  • case report
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy is now the standard and most surgeons use two 5 mm and one 10–12 mm port; the latter placed into the umbilicus. Various attempts have been made to reduce the number and sizes of ports for this procedure.

Case report

A 22-year-old male with acute right lower quadrant pain came to our emergency room. His white blood count (WBC) was 15000 l/ml and on CT scan signs of acute appendicitis were found. He was taken to the operating room. His abdomen was accessed with a Verres in the left upper quadrant (LUQ) and once pneumoperitoneum was established a 5 mm trocar was placed under visual control into the left lower quadrant (LLQ). A phlegmonous appendix was found attached to the right abdominal wall. The Verres needle was exchanged for another 5 mm trocar. A Maryland grasper was used to bluntly create a window between appendix base and mesoappendix. The appendiceal artery was dissected out and secured with a 5 mm clip and the mesoappendix was cut off the appendix. Two endoloops were lassoed around the appendix and tied at the appendix base and the specimen was amputated between the ties. The appendix was pulled with the distal tie towards the LUQ port, which was removed. The appendix base was grabbed with a Kelly clamp and the specimen was pulled through the port site. Pneumoperitoneum was released and the LLQ port removed and the skin closed. The patient was discharged after 2 h and had a completely uneventful recovery.

Conclusion

In selected cases with favorable anatomy, laparoscopic appendectomy with two 5 mm ports may be possible. Miniaturizing this procedure while carefully weighing patient safety and costs should be a goal for laparoscopic appendectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Liu Y. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2305–18. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3561-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Kercher KW, Reardon PR, Heniford BT. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(6):351–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Panait L, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Minimizing the minimally invasive approach. J Surg Res. 2009;153(1):167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts KE. True single-port appendectomy: First experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):613–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayaalp C, Tolan K, Yagci MA. Corrigendum to “Transvaginal appendectomy: A systematic review”. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;2015:527140.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yagci MA, Kayaalp C. Transvaginal appendectomy: A systematic review. Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:384706.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Konstantinidis K. Robotic appendectomy 2011. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzjs9tzS5Jk..

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donmez T, Hut A, Avaroglu H, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Ferahman S, et al. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;91(2):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

There is no funding to be reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Bonatti MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Bonatti declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

The paper is not in review at another journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonatti, H. Laparoscopic appendectomy using only two 5 mm trocars. Eur Surg 49, 145–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0465-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0465-1

Keywords

Navigation