Abstract
This research was conducted to determine the changes in the seasonal carbohydrates of annual shoots and growth characteristics of 10 years old ‘Trakya İlkeren’ grape variety. Grapevines are grafted on 5BB and 5C rootstocks and they were grown in heavy clay soil conditions. In the study, changes of sugar, starch and total carbohydrates were determined from bud burst to dormancy. While sugar, starch and total carbohydrates showed significant differences (P < 0.01) there were no differences between rootstocks. Although sugar, starch and total carbohydrates of shoots decreased from bud burst to blooming, they increased thereafter until vegetative growth stopped. Total carbohydrates of annual shoots have been found to accumulate in period from blooming to harvest. Total and mean leaf area, shoot length and diameter, total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a/b ratio showed significantly variation among rootstocks and phenological stages (P < 0.01). Whereas the highest chlorophyll contents were found in the blooming, it was found at the lowest through to harvest. Overall mean and total leaf area, shoot length and shoot diameter, total chlorophyll content and chlorophyll a/b ratio were significantly higher on 5BB grafted vines. In the study, 5BB rootstocks are found suitable in terms of shoot carbohydrate accumulation and growth characteristics for ‘Trakya İlkeren’ grape variety.
Zusammenfassung
Diese Forschungsarbeit wurde durchgeführt, um die saisonalen Veränderungen von Kohlenhydratgehalten bei Jahrestrieben und die Wachstumseigenschaften von 10 Jahre alten Reben der Sorte ‘Trakya İlkeren’ zu untersuchen. Die Rebsorte war auf den Unterlagen 5BB und 5C veredelt und auf schwerem Lehmboden gepflanzt. Vom Knospenaufbruch bis zur Vegetationsruhe wurden in dieser Studie Veränderungen im Zucker-, Stärke-, und Gesamtkohlenhydratgehalt bestimmt. Zucker-, Stärke-, und Gesamtkohlenhydratgehalte zeigten im Verlauf der Vegetationsperiode signifikante Unterschiede (P < 0,01), wobei es keine Unterschiede zwischen den Unterlagen gab. Auch wenn in den Sprossen Zucker-, Stärke-, und Kohlenhydratgehalte vom Knospenaufbruch bis zum Blühbeginn abnahmen, stiegen sie danach bis zum Ende des vegetativen Wachstums wieder an. Kohlenhydrate wurden in der Zeit vom Blühbeginn bis zur Ernte in der Pflanze akkumuliert. Die gesamte und mittlere Blattfläche, die Trieblänge und der -durchmesser, der Chlorophyllgehalt und das Verhältnis von Chlorophyll a zu b zeigten signifikante Unterschiede zwischen den Unterlagen und den phänologischen Entwicklungsstadien (P < 0,01). Während die höchsten Chlorophyllgehalte zu Blühbeginn gefunden wurden, wurden die niedrigsten bei der Ernte festgestellt. Insgesamt lässt sich sagen, dass mittlere und gesamte Blattfläche, Trieblänge und -durchmesser, Gesamtchlorophyllgehalt und das Verhältnis von Chlorophyll a zu b bei Reben, die auf der Unterlage 5BB veredelt waren, signifikant höher ausfielen als auf der Unterlage 5C. Die Unterlage 5BB ist daher hinsichtlich Akkumulation von Kohlenhydraten im Spross und der Wuchsbeeinflussung für die Rebsorte ‘Trakya İlkeren’ geeignet.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balasubrahmanyam VR, Eifert J, Diofasi L (1978) Nutrient reserves in grapevine canes as influenced by cropping levels. Vitis 17:23–29
Bates TR, Dunst RM, Joy P (2002) Seasonal dry matter, starch, and nutrient distribution in ‘Concord’ grapevine roots. HortScience 37:313–316
Boselli M, Fregoni M, Vercesi A, Volpe B (1992) Variation in mineral composition and effects on the growth and yield of Chardonnay grapes on various rootstocks. Agric Ricerca 14:138–139
Candolfi-Vasconcelos MC, Koblet W (1990) Yield, fruit quality, bud fertility and starch reserves of the wood as a function of leaf removal in Vitis vinifera-Evidence of compensation and stress recovering. Vitis 29(4):199–221
Caspari HW, Lang A, Alspach P (1998) Effects of girdling and leaf removal on fruit set and vegetative growth in grape. Am J Enol Viticult 49:359–366
Coombe BG (1995) Growth stages of the grapevine: adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Aust J Grape Wine Res 1:104–110
Dokoozlian NK (2000) Grape berry growth and development. In: Christenson LP (ed) Raisin production manual. Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication, vol 3393. University of California, Oakland, pp 30–37
El-Gendy RSS (2013) Evaluation of flame seedless grapevines grafted on some rootstocks. J Hort Sci Ornam Plants 5:1–11
Elsner EA, Jubb GL (1988) Leaf area estimation of Concord grape leaves from simple linear measurements. Am J Enol Viticult 39:95–97
Ferroni G, Scalabrelli G (1995) Effect of rootstock on vegetative activity and yield in grapevine. Acta Hortic 388:37–42
Göktürk BN, Hallac F, Çetin S, Babalık Z (2005) Investigation of seasonal carbohydrate changes in grapevine cuttings. Turkey VI. Viticultural Symposium, Tekirdağ 2:383–389
Hale CR, Weaver RV (1962) The effect of developmental stage on direction of translocation of photosynthate in Vitis vinifera. Hilgardia 33:89–13
Hamman RA, Dami IE, Walsh TM, Stushnoff C (1996) Seasonal carbohydrate changes and cold hardiness of Chardonnay and Riesling grapevines. Am J Enol Viticult 47:31–36
Holzapfel BP, Smith JP (2012) Developmental stage and climatic factors impact more on carbohydrate reserve dynamics of Shiraz than cultural practice. Am J Enol Vitic 63:333–342
Hunter JJ, Visser JH (1988) Distribution of 14C-photosynthetate in the shoot of vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. II. the effect of partial defoliation. S Afr J Enol Vitic 9:10–15
Jogaiah S, Oulkar DP, Banerjee K, Sharma J, Patil AG, Maske SR, Somkuwar RG (2013) Biochemically induced variations during some phenological stages in thompson seedless grapevines grafted on different rootstocks. S Afr J Enol Vitic 34:36–45
Kliewer WM, Nassar AR (1966) Changes in concentration of organic acids, sugars, and amino acids in grape leaves. Am J Enol Vitic 17:48–57
Koblet W (1969) Wanderung von Assimilaten in Rebtrieben und Einfluss der Blattfläche auf Ertrag und Qualität der Trauben. Wein Wiss 24:277–319
Koblet W (1977) Translocation of photosynthate in grapevines. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Quality of the Vintage, Cape Town, South Africa, 14-21 Feb, pp 45–51
Köse B, Karabulut B, Ceylan K (2014) Effect of rootstock on grafted grapevine quality. Eur J Hort Sci 79:197–202
Kozlowski TT (1992) Carbohydrate sources and sinks in woody plants. Bot Rev 58:107–222
Lakso AN, Intrigliolo D, Eissenstat DM (2008) Modelling concord grapes with “VitiSim”, a simplified carbon balance model: understanding pruning effects. Acta Hortic 83:243–250
Lebon G, Wojnarowiez G, Holzapfel B, Fontaine F, Vaillant-Gaveau N, Clement C (2008) Sugars and flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J Exper Bot 59:2565–2578
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 603:591–592
Loescher WH, Mc Camant T, Keller JD (1990) Carbohydrate reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots. HortScience 25:274–281
Mc Artney SJ (1998) Remobilisation of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen and their importance for initial development of grapevine shoots. The Ohio State University, U.S.A, p. 340
Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) Biology of horticultural crops: biology of the grapevine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 239
Nikolaou N, Angelopoulos K, Karagiannidis N (2003) Effects of drought stress on mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine, grafted onto various rootstocks. Exp Agric 39:241–252
Scholefield PB, Neales TP, May P (1978) Carbon balance of the sultana vine (Vitis vinifera L.) and the effects of autumn defoliation by harvest pruning. Austral J Plant Phys 5:561–570
Scott TA, Melvin EH (1953) Determination of dextran with anthrone. Anal Chem 25:1656–1661
Smith JP (2004) Investigations into the mechanisms underlying grapevine rootstock effects on scion growth and yield. PhD Thesis, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga-Australia, p. 196
Smith J, Rogiers S, Quirk L, Holzapfel B (2009) Management of carbohydrate reserve accumulation as a tool for regulating vine productivity and fruit quality. Australian Government Grape and Wine Research Development Corparation. Final Report, 30 September 2009, p. 83 (http://www.gwrdc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/CSU-05-01.pdf)
Verma SK, Singh SK, Krishna H (2010) The effect of certain rootstocks on the grape cultivar ‘Pusa Urvashi’ (Vitis vinifera L.). Int J Fruit Sci 10(1):16–28
Weaver RJ (1976) Grape Growing. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 371
Weyand KM, Schultz HR (2006) Long-term dynamics of nitrogen and carbohydrate reserves in woody parts of minimally and severely pruned Riesling vines in a cool climate. Am J Enol Vitic 57(2):172–182
Winkler AJ, Williams WO (1945) Starch and sugars of Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol 20:412–432
Winkler AJ, Cook JA, Kliewer WM, Lider LA (1974) General viticulture. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA p. 710
Wolstenholme BN, Whiley AW (1997) What do carbohydrate reserves tell us about avocado orchard management? S Afr Avocado Grow Assoc Yearb 20:63–67
Yang YS, Hori Y (1980) Studies on translocation of accumulated assimilates in Delaware grapevines III. Early growth of new shoots as dependent on accumulated and current year assimilates. Tohoku J Agric Res 31:120–129
Van der Zijpp S, Creagh T (2011) Grape physiology. Course notes. Eastern Institute of Technology National Certificate in Horticulture, Faculty of Science and Technology, Hawke’s Bay, p 92
Zufferey V, Murisier F, Vivin P, Belcher S, Lorenzini F, Spring JL, Viret O (2012) Carbohydrate reserves in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ‘Chasselas’) influence of leaf to fruit ratio. Vitis 51(3):103–110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Köse, B., Ateş, S. Seasonal Changes of Shoot Carbohydrates and Growth Characteristics of ‘Trakya İlkeren’ Grape Variety (Vitis vinifera L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau 59, 61–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0298-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0298-2