Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water productivity, nutrients uptake and quality of aerobic rice as influenced by varieties and iron nutrition

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI), New Delhi, India, during Kharif (June–October) seasons of 2011 and 2012 to study the effect of rice varieties and iron fertilization on water productivity, nutrient uptake and quality of aerobic rice. Treatments comprised of two rice varieties (PRH-10 and PS-5) and eight sources and modes of iron fertilization—control (no iron), iron sulphate @ 50 kg/ha + one foliar spray of 2.0% iron sulphate, iron sulphate @ 50 kg/ha + one foliar spray of 0.5% iron chelate, iron sulphate @ 100 kg/ha, two foliar sprays of 2.0% iron sulphate, three foliar sprays of 2.0% iron sulphate, two foliar sprays of 0.5% iron chelate and three foliar sprays of 0.5% iron chelate. Study results indicated that variety PRH-10 had higher concentration and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and iron than PS-5 variety in grain, straw and grain + straw. Three foliar sprays of 2.0% iron sulphate or 0.5% iron chelate favoured higher NPK and iron concentration and uptake in grain and straw of aerobic rice. Grain quality in respect of hulling, milling and head rice recovery was, however, superior in PS-5 than PRH-10. But the protein content was significantly higher in PRH-10 than in PS-5. Application of three foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate and three foliar sprays of 0.5% iron chelate recorded significantly higher hulling, milling and head rice recovery as compared to control and remained statistically similar with each other. Irrigation and total water productivity was substantially higher in PRH-10 over PS-5. Growing of rice with PRH-10 recorded ~7.7% higher total water productivity as compared to PS-5, across iron fertilizations. Three or two foliar sprays of 2.0% iron sulphate or 0.5% iron chelate favoured higher irrigation and total water productivity of aerobic rice over control (no iron).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2013) 4th Advance estimate 2012–13, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India

  • Bouma BAM (2001) Water efficient management strategies in rice production. Int Rice Res Inst Notes 16(20):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dass A, Chandra S (2013) Irrigation, spacing and cultivar effects on net photosynthetic rate, dry matter partitioning and productivity of rice under system of rice intensification in Mollisols of Northern India. Exp Agric. doi:10.1017/S0014479713000252

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Yates F (1963) Statistical tables. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Frossard E, Bucher M, Mächler F, Mozafar A, Hurrell R (2000) Potential for increasing the content and bioavailability of Fe, Zn and Ca in plants for human nutrition. J Sci Food Agric 80:861–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghafari H, Razmjoo J (2015) Response of durum wheat to foliar application of varied sources and rates of iron fertilizers. J Agric Sci Technol 17(2):321–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. In: An international rice research institute book, 2nd edn. A Wiley-Inter science Publication, Wiley, New York

  • Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Asian publication house, New Delhi, pp 173–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Ladha JK (2011) Direct seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Adv Agron 111:297–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena C, Romera FJ, Rojas CL, Garcia MJ, Alcantara E, Perez VR (2007) Bicarbonate blocks the expression of several genes involved in the physiological responses to Fe deficiency of Strategy I plants. Funct Plant Biol 34:1002–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean L (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium carbonate. U.S.D.A, Washington, p 933

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R (2011) Aerobic rice systems. Adv Agron 111:207–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Sharma SN (2006) Learning by doing exercises in soil fertility (A practical manual for soil fertility). Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z, Batten GD, Crowley DE (1999) Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crops Res 60:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahai VN, Choudhary RC (1986) Root system in hybrid rice. Int Rice Res Newsl 11:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgotra RK, Katoch PC, Sood M (2002) Performance of rice hybrids for yield and quality traits under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. J Res SKUAST J 1:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Souframanein J, Rangasamy P, Vaidyanathan P, Thangaraj M (1998) Heterosis under drought condition in hybrid rice. Oryza 35(2):120–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for assessment of available nitrogen in rice soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuong TP, Bouman BAM (2002) Rice production in water-scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement, vol 1., The comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture seriesCABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 13–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuong TP, Bouman BAM (2003) Rice production in water-scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvements. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 53–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vosenek LACJ and Van DVR (1994) The role of phytohormones in plant stress: too much or too little water. Acta Bot Neerlandica 43:91–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav S, Gill G, Humphreys E, Kukal SS, Walia US (2012) Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Field Crops Res 120:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav GS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Babu S (2013) Enhancing iron density and uptake in grain and straw of aerobic rice through mulching and rhizo-foliar fertilization of iron. Afr J Agric Res 8:5447–5454

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi XP, Chen FY (1992) Genetical effect of different cytoplasms on rice cooking, milling and nutrient quality of indica type hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci 6(4):187–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler RS (2007) Rice and the millennium development goals: the International Rice Research Institute’s strategic plan 2007–2015. Paddy Water Environ 5:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikash Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Kumar, D., Singh, Y.V. et al. Water productivity, nutrients uptake and quality of aerobic rice as influenced by varieties and iron nutrition. Paddy Water Environ 15, 821–830 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-017-0595-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-017-0595-x

Keywords

Navigation