Abstract
Global climate governance still faces serious challenges despite the epochal Paris Agreement of 2015. Whether and how the world will reach the targeted 1.5-degree limit remains difficult to foresee, although undoubtedly one of the necessary conditions is greater cooperation among the major greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting nations. In this light, the decision by the USA, the second largest GHG emitter in the world, to withdraw from the Paris Agreement has significant global ramifications. Another source of uncertainty is the European Union’s climate policy, which has long been a role model for the world; it will likely have to undergo major changes as a result of the UK’s exit from the EU, which is projected to take place in 2019. Against this backdrop of profound geopolitical changes, this article argues that strengthened cooperation between the EU and China—the world’s largest GHG emitter, but also its largest investor in renewable energy and an increasingly vocal voice for climate action—is indispensable for meaningful climate change mitigation and adaptation in the decades ahead, even if the end results still fall short of the ambitions outlined in the Paris Agreement. Diverging economic and political interests still exist, but there is also much common interest and ample room for collaboration. We review the progress and challenges in EU-China cooperation on climate change and put forward practical suggestions for plausible future directions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Progress made in cutting emissions. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/progress_en (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
Renewables: Energy and Equipment Trade Developments in the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee1_3_en.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
China-EU Clean Energy Center launched in Beijing. http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9650/2011/20110225232444937650243/20110225232444937650243_.html (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
7th China-EU Energy Cooperation Conference held in Brussels (in Chinese). http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-11/07/content_1142101.htm (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU-China CDM Facilitation Project. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/china/documents/projects/1_eu-china_cdm_facilitation_project_fiche.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
China-EU Near Zero Emission Coal. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/dossiers/nzec_en (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
12th EU-China Summit. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/events/articles/0022_en. (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU-China Clean Energy Centre (EC2). http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/china/documents/eu_china/science_tech_environment/ec2.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
Renewables: Energy and Equipment Trade Developments in the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee1_3_en.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU scales back tariffs on Chinese solar panels. https://www.ft.com/content/ac91fa36-1835-331d-8b63-3cde54c65790 (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
“Provincial Programmes for Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation in China”. http://www.ccchina.org.cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/2008/200872105017350.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU and China settle trade fight over solar panels. https://www.ft.com/content/4e468c26-f6ab-11e2-8620-00144feabdc0 (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
Renewables: Energy and Equipment Trade Developments in the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee1_3_en.pdf. (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU and China settle trade fight over solar panels. https://www.ft.com/content/4e468c26-f6ab-11e2-8620-00144feabdc0 (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU and China fail to issue statement on climate at summit. http://climateobserver.org/eu-china-fail-issue-statement-climate-summit/ (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU-China CDM Facilitation Project- Technology Transfer in CDM projects in China. http://neec.no/uploads/EU-China%20CDM-TT%20report.pdf (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
EU and China can outflank Trump on climate change. http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/02/16/eu-and-china-should-join-forces-on-climate-change/ (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
Why Climate Change Could be Brexit’s Biggest Loser. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/j-jason-mitchell/why-climate-change-could-_b_11021204.html (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
Study Claims Solar Panel Tariffs Could Trigger 242,000 Job Losses. https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/study-claims-solar-panel-tariffs-could-trigger-242-000-job-losses/ (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
China-EU photovoltaic products trade dispute (in Chinese). http://finance.sina.com.cn/focus/umdhfq/ (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
246 mayors adopt Paris climate accord after U.S. pulls out (updated). https://www.curbed.com/2017/6/1/15726376/paris-accord-climate-change-mayors-trump (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
US mayors, governors vow to stick with Paris accord. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/01/us/trump-climate-deal-cities-states-defying/index.html (Accessed on October 27, 2018)
References
Belis D, Kerremans B (2016) The socialization potential of the CDM in EU–China climate relations. Int Environ Agreem-P 16:543–559
Chatham House (2007) Changing climates: interdependencies on energy and climate security for China and Europe. Chatham House, London
Christiansen T, Maher R (2017) The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union. Asia Europe Journal 15:121–131
Davis G, Hall J (2006) Circular economy legislation: the international experience. In: Paper for the environment and natural resources protection Committee of the National People’s congress
De Jong M, Stout H, Sun L (2017) Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the eyes of Montesquieu: why Sino-European collaboration on Eco City development suffers from European misinterpretations of “good governance”. Sustainability 9:151
De Matteis P (2010) EU-China cooperation in the field of energy, environment and climate change. J Contemp Eur Res 6:449–477
De Matteis P (2012) The EU’s and China’s institutional diplomacy in the field of climate change. European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/eus-and-chinasinstitutional-diplomacy-field-climate-change. Accessed 16 Dec 2018
Dröge S (2016) International climate diplomacy after the Trump election victory: Germany and the EU should intensify their outreach to climate allies. SWP Comments 50. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/international-climate-diplomacy-after-thetrump-election-victory/. Accessed 16 Dec 2018
Froggatt A, Raines T, Tomlinson S (2016) UK unplugged? In: The impacts of Brexit on energy and climate policy. Chatham House, London
Gippner O, Torney D (2017) Shifting policy priorities in EU-China energy relations: implications for Chinese energy investments in Europe. Energy Policy 101:649–658
Hilton I, Kerr O (2017) The Paris agreement: China’s ‘new Normal’ role in international climate negotiations. Clim Pol 17:48–58
Holzer C, Zhang H (2008) The potentials and limits of China–EU cooperation on climate change and energy security. Asia Europe Journal 6:217–227
Jin L (2015) Ten-year Sino-EU Partnership on climate change: leads to comprehensive and pragmatic cooperation. China Int Stud 54:38–55
Lee H, Wang P (2017) Filling the (green) vacuum. http://www.themarknews.com/2017/03/06/filling-the-vacuum/. Accessed 16 Dec 2018
Lee B, Mabey N, Preston F, Froggatt A, Bradley S (2015) Enhancing engagement between China and the EU on resource governance and low-carbon development. Chatham House, London
Liu L, de Jong M (2017) The institutional causes of environmental protests in China: a perspective from common pool resource management. J Chin Gov 2:460–477
Liu L, Wu T, Huang Y (2017) An equity-based framework for defining national responsibilities in global climate change mitigation. Clim Dev 9:152–163
Lock T (2014) Review of the Balance of Competences between the United Kingdom and the European Union: Fundamental Rights. Edinburgh Law School Working Papers no. 2014/02. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2378220
Men J (2014) Climate change and EU–China partnership: realist disguise or institutionalist blessing? Asia Europe Journal 12:49–62
Parker CF, Karlsson C, Hjerpe M (2017) Assessing the European Union’s global climate change leadership: from Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement. J Eur Integr 39:239–252
Qi Y, Stern N, Wu T, Lu J, Green F (2016) China’s post-coal growth. Nat Geosci 9:564–566
Romano GC (2010) The EU-China partnership on climate change: Bilateralism begetting multilateralism in promoting a climate change regime. MERCURY E-paper No. 8. http://mercury.unikoeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/E-paper_no8_r2010.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2018
Snyder F (2009) The European Union and China, 1949–2008: basic documents and commentary. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
UN Habitat (2011) Cities and climate change: global report on human settlements 2011. Earthscan, London
Walsh B, Ciais P, Janssens IA, Peñuelas J, Riahi K, Rydzak F, van Vuuren DP, Obersteiner M (2017) Pathways for balancing CO2 emissions and sinks. Nat Commun 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14856
Acknowledgments
The first version of the paper was presented at “The Jean Monnet Fellowship Programme@25” Alumni Conference hosted by the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies of European University Institute in 2017. We appreciate the comments from the participants and anonymous reviewers.
Funding
The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 71704126) and Sichuan University (Grant No: skqx201605).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Wu, T. & Wan, Z. The EU-China relationship in a new era of global climate governance. Asia Eur J 17, 243–254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018-00530-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018-00530-2